I've been reading about the czech national revival and an interesting thing is that some revivalists were originally germans who decided that czech culture and language were super cool, learned the language and became czech nationalists. What's the cause of this?
>>18480097To give some examplesMiroslav Tyrš (born Friedrich Tirsch) and Jindřich Fügner (born Heinrich Fügner) who founded Sokol - a czech patriotic physical training organization. Božena Němcová (born Barbara Pankl) one of the most important revivalist writers, born to a czech mother and a german father, grew up at the court of a Silesian duchess which was of course german speaking. Bedřich Smetana (born Friedrich Smetana) one of the most important czech composers and revivalists. He grew up speaking german. Josef Mánes one of the most important artists of the revival. Also grew up speaking german. Vojtěch Náprstek (born Adalbert Fingerhut) another influential revivalist. Vilém Dušan Lambl (born Wilhelm Lambl) who became an important biologist and also dedicated a lot of time to studying slavic languages he was also a revivalist and later had trouble with the secret police because of his agitation. His brothers were also important revivalists and fierce czech nationalists
>>18480097What's supposed to be weird about it? You had the exact same thing with Germans and Jews in Hungary throwing their lot behind Magyar nationalism and Magyarising themselves much more willingly than most non-Magyar Hungarians.You also have random funky families where guy A becomes turbo-Magyar (so anti-everything else), a modern national hero and the other becomes turbo-anti-Magyar and becomes a big figure in, e.g. Slovak national revival. Same parents and background.Must have made for really awkward family gatherings.A real oddity would be complete foreigners signing up and becoming big, not Bohemians who just happen to not be Czech (or Hungarians who happen to not be Magyars). Think people from Senegal, Ireland or Netherlands.
>>18481441The line between Czechs and Germans was blurred due to centuries of deliberate Germanization. The lands of the Czech Crown were not an apartheid state, anyone whose family lived there for generations was bound to have both Czech and German ancestry. The fact that your family spoke German and not Czech could at times simply be a class thing rather than ethnicity thing.
>>18481452>A real oddity would be complete foreigners signing up and becoming bigI looked into it and there were some foreigners who kinda participated in the revivalErnest Denis who was a french historian and politician. He traveled to Bohemia many times in his life, learned czech, wrote extensively about czech history, gave lectures about czech history on french universities, and relentlessly agitated for czech independence. He actually worked with Masaryk and Beneš and helped them with achieving recognition abroad. This dude was a certified czechaboo. Louis Leger, another frenchman who traveled to bohemia, learned czech and agitated for czech independence and wrote about czech and slavic history.
>>18481461Yeah, it seems that many middle and upper class czechs simply adopted german due to social mobility and didn't bother to teach their kids czech. Once the revival started, speaking czech stopped being associated with being a poor peasant and middle and upper class czechs started speaking czech again.
>Muhammad is emulated not just as a religious leader, but also as a husband, father, neighbor, and community leader>Muslims strive to incorporate his Sunnah (his traditions, sayings, and actions) into their daily lives. This ranges from major ethical principles—like honesty, charity, and compassion—to personal habits, such as how he ate, greeted others, and treated his family.>Worship and Character: His life is considered the practical interpretation of the Quran. By acting like Muhammad, Muslims believe they are pleasing God and living a righteous life.>married a child..uhh they're all in support of ... by default ?
>>18482059>Capitalist Christians and Jews are starving usKek. No it's your souless demon cult that's starving them because it has no empathy for its islamists and has to sacrifice them to Allah. Nobody is shedding tears for them especially the Hindus these demons genocided.
>>18482137Right is that why your masters are basically the only nations that support starvation? Also imagine complaining about genocide when the only one here who has such hatred for a people (that never did anything to your nation) is you. btw they see you as savages to be exploited and they laugh at the idea, remember the recent jamboy meme? that's how they think of you so your attempt to appease them is fruitless and pathetic
>>18482155>The hand of the thief shall be cut off if he steals a quarter of a Dinar or more.Kek. Lying demon cult islamist your coping Dr Mustafa here >>18482010was inspired by the empathy of these "starving" Capitalists that's why you are ashamed to even tell the Truth about you souless greedy Theocratic pedofag demon cult. Even when you cleanse ALL the "EVIL" hadiths you don't like you still can't cleanse the Evilness from it because of its nature.
>>18482164Okay so you're running away now that you know your evil is exposed? Imagine mocking starving children and trying to dehumanize them then thinking of yourself as righteous in any way.
>>18482174>If you remove the hadiths entirely except for those that do not contradict the Quran and enforce Quranism with rationalism.Kek. Runs back to Hadiths and interpretations when exposed to his demonic Quran. Abdool only a retarded Islamoleftist buys your meme and may be your White supremacist allies against the "Zog" nobody else buys your demonic victimhood.
Right so God is 3 beings but one God and that's somehow monotheism even though the trinity never mentioned in the Bible and Augustine himself couldn't explain it.He created the entire universe a few thousand years ago but faked evidence to make it look billions of years old just because.He condemned the entire human race to sinfulness and death because a woman who had been alive for hours or days with no knowledge of morality ate a fruit at the behest of a talking snake and gained self awareness as a result which is apparently evil.And despite being all good and all powerful God can't just forgive us himself but rather everyone has to go to Hell because of this incident.God then lives as the Judean storm deity for a few centuries, genociding people in a giant flood, torturing Job for a bet, losing fights to metal chariots, appearing as a talking bush here and there.He confuses the entire planets languages for building a ziggurat too tall but he has no problems with space travel or skyscrapers today.He then impregnates a 14 year old girl with himself to be born as his own son to die so he can forgive us for a sin he knew we'd commit under the conditions he placed us in.But even then you're only saved if you eat a bread wafer every Sunday believing it's literally human flesh and believe fully in his tales without requiring any evidence.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18479822>forgive us himself I want you to know that the Son of Man has authority on earth to forgive sins.” So he said to the paralyzed man, “Get up, take your mat and go home.”
>>18479995>then why do you believeYou are not addressing what he believes. You are arguing against a straw man.
>>18479995>faithFaith is about effective semantics and persuasion, not being gullible.The simple believe anything, but the prudent give thought to their stepsDo not rape your good judgment by ignoring the etymology of words.
>>18480323A man loving the asshole of another man is also very hated, well then I guess it's a valid form of love according to you christkeks
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6xcj-bZb-LgJohn 1:1-2: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God."John 1:14 “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”Philipp 2:5-8: Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross."Matthew 28:19“Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:”1 John 5:20“And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.”Matthew 4:7: “Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.”Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
What would be the global attitude of the time if Nazi Germany wasn’t expansionist but it became public knowledge they were killing their Jews? Obviously it’d be frowned upon but would they face any repercussions or would the world at large be afraid of pissing off a militarised Germany and escalating the situation. Would they just become pariahs and the world at large would forget in a few decades? They went through a great deal to cover it up so they knew it’d be a hard sell to the powers of the time what they were up to.
>>18480713USA didn't invade Germany because they wanted bases there lmao, Germany threated global maritime trade system by attacking France and UK
>>18479462>WIR SIND DIE GEYES SCHWARZE HAUFENhttps://music.youtube.com/watch?v=ekOlKeqCy5s&si=Sum-LHM0ZLm15WwIHEIL HITLER !DEUTSCHLAND ERWACHE !SIEG HEIL!
>>18479462>>18480890>>18481221The historical memory of the Holocaust has been telescoped a bit as well because it wasn't as much of a widespread thing in terms of knowledge / awareness / belief among non-Jews until years after the war, like the 1960s/1970s, because Jews themselves didn't like to talk about it because it was really upsetting. My sense is there was definitely a widespread belief that the Nazis were mass murderers but what was really pronounced in hostility to German things was Germany's association with aggression and war. It was seen as just a brutal, militaristic and threatening hostile nation that was very different from Germany now.
>>18480713>I think no nation ever in human history invaded another nation simply to save certain people inside it. The idea is completely retardedThe U.S. also didn't really let Jewish emigres from Europe in at the time, wasn't trying to "save" them. Some did make it, but it was difficult. The U.S. had restrictive immigration policies at the time which tightened up in the 1920s. There was talk in the U.S. about persecution of Jews in Germany with American Jews bringing attention to it through the newspapers where they had influence, but it wasn't a decisive thing from everything I've read about it. Didn't really figure at all in pro-war propaganda once the U.S. and Germany were at war. More this:https://youtu.be/LL1fVdyIlCw
Also the last thing is that GERMAN Jews comprised a small percentage of Holocaust victims, around 3% of the total, and a lot of German Jews were fleeing by the 1930s, roughly half got out before the Holocaust really started. The vast majority killed were in occupied territories to the east because that's where most of the Jews lived.
I did not care for the Romanovs.
>>18482033
>>18481272the fate of anyone who oposses the holy might of Bolshevism
>>18482047Lol Stalin purged many of the original bolsheviks including some of the Romanov murderers
He was too pure for this cruel world. Never forget his Cocker Spaniel was the only one to survive the ordeal.>>18482033The commies actually had to rotate the guards and replace them with foreign mercenaries because they were becoming too friendly with the family. And even among the assassins, some of them refused to shoot the women.
>>18481319Torture is never good. It's poison to the people who do it.
Protestant = Spiritually WhiteCatholic = Spiritually BrownPagan = Spiritually BlackBuddhist = Spiritually YellowHindu = Spiritually ShitskinnedAtheist = Spiritually Queer
>>18479356Spot on.
>>18479356What does any of this mean?
>>18481630Which part don't you understand?
>>18479356op is shitskin pajeet spewing shit
>>18481993Hi Beaner!
> Be Hector> Champion of Troy, defender of the high walls> Spend all morning putting on polished bronze armor> Walk out to the battlefield to challenge the Greeks to honorable combat> Achilles steps out> He isn't holding a spear> He prints out a giant tablet depicting me as the virgin onions next to a Chad depiction of a wooden horse> The entire Greek army starts hitting their shields chanting "L + ratio + no maidens + touch bronze"> My morale is shattered> I forfeit the cityWhat did history mean by this?
The name (of God) can not be spoken, but if you know how, it can be used to rule all of creation. Jesus taught how, but few so called Christians today understand salvation.
>>18481615The yoke of your enslavement, the Law, the burden of Jews alone, and theoretically by following the Mosaic Commandments no righteous man will have just cause to destroy them. That is the protection of the covenant, but it is the Law of exiles and slaves who are divested of God's authority. You outcast who waits for your messiah, do not think you can enslave the world under the terms of your enslavement, and perhaps if you do follow the Law (you do not) then you will not be destroyed, but if you break the Law, then God will take pleasure in the righteousness of your destruction.
>>18479976>YahwehYou're a fucking idiot. Have fun burning. :)
>>18478331His name is anonymous, he is legion
>>18478331XNITY PRIMERhttp://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1a-9eWjZWH-6uUOcRFJ4hFsgB2vOhdZZfgoogle drive easy to use interface...read moar discern moar
>>18481427It is kind of retarded, but not completely innacurate.
>makes king Louis a cuckold>makes his own son a cuckold>spent his whole reign fighting his son'sWhy was he such an asshole?
Behold, greatness has arrivedTo my knowledge, the shared features between Italic and Celtic languages could be explained by either a later divergence between them, or by arial effects between the two groups, which would have diverged earlier but remained more similar due to geographic proximity and continued cultural exchange between the groups of speakers, or i m missing something?
Celtic languages and Semitic languages share the same VSO word order.They also share the same mutation of initial consonants.Funny however how this never gets addressed seriously and everyone copes by claiming "it's just a coincidence bro".
>>18481827What do you mean? That there's actually a magical connection uniting the "Semites" and the Celts? Oh wait, who knows, Indo-Uralic-Afro-Asiatic
>>18481837>>18481827The Semites have been educating, teaching, and influencing the Indo-Europeans since the Early Indo-European period; many words are Semitic loanwords, so this is nothing new. The Phoenicians influenced the Celts and taught them the art of metallurgy.
>>18481827>>18481837>>18481840Off topic, retard
>>18481715Italo-Celtic is taken seriously by geneticists and linguists and has seen some new interest in the recent book "The reconstruction of Indo-European stop systems" where the stops of Italic and Celtic are reconstructed to a unified system and the result is seen as significant for "glottalic theory".Kloekhorst, A., & Pronk, T. (Eds.). (2026). The reconstruction of Indo-European stop systems: From the traditional model to glottalic theories (Leiden Studies in Indo-European, Vol. 29). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004750449
1)there are upsides (stress relief, sedation) and downsides (lower lifespan, lung disease) to smoking2)doctors prioritise the patients' health over simple pleasure, only exceptions being things like terrible pain or something that would drive one to suicide ie things you can't live with.3)there are upsides (delivery) and downsides (depression, obesity) to pregnancy4)the upsides of both smoking and pregnancy are fleeting pleasures that people can and do comfortably live without, while the downsides are potentially serious health issues4.5)doctors already caution against smoking for these reasons Conclusion: doctors should caution AGAINST pregnancy.
>>18479952>Yeah sorry I was in a bus and had to change.all good brother>I don't know how common awareness for pregnancy caused depression is but that's not really relevant to it beingYea same, I only believed it was mood swings, but to keep it between me and you; you know how women are, they develop a slight mood swing outside of their period and make a huge fuss about >Trite example but construction workers didn't know asbestos was harmful for like a decade, doesn't mean it wasn't harming people during that time. Doctors all agree, it's not at all controversial that it's real.Yea but pregnancy isn't anything like asbestos, when you get pregnant its not like a ticking time bomb gets set off and activates after 30 year; 99% of women get pregnant, give birth and nothing happens, there isn't really any significant advance effects from getting pregnant.>As per your other objection, i was actually referring to the entire process of delivery nurturing the child and so on. None of that has positive effects on the mother's health.yea but as 100 mothers what was the best thing that happened to them, they will either say getting married or having their baby; there is great primordial fulfilment from nurturing a child and watching them grow up. I believe if they have the proper resources nurturing a child into an adult is a net positive.>Additionally, whatever happiness can be derived from the experience post-birth can be gained just as well via adoption, with no health risks whatsoever.You probably don't know, but there is a reason why people only really adopt when they cant physically give birth; there is something innate with all of us to pass down our genes, also I'm pretty sure there are study's showing how adopted children get treated worse then their genetic counterparts. Also I for one would much preferer having my child as my own other than adopting oneComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18480049>but clearly something (i'm guessing social factors and maternity leave but that is purely a guess) motivates women to give birth over adoption, so that's why I phrased it this wayNo I'm believe its a majority genetic factor; you probably live in the uk seeing how you provided a source from the NHS, i have lived in Britain (Manchester) for around a year for a bit of work and education, and if I had to say one thing about the women there, its that they are so miserable and unhealthy (I blame the weather and other stuff); and I believe this has resulted in women not wanting to have children because they are in such an unnatural environment. If you have high libido you would naturally want to cum inside a girl or vice versa for women who naturally want have children. >Oh and as for the number, idk what percentage or smokers develop lung cancer but even if it was 5%, that would be enough to warrant the unavoidable warnings they come with.yea fair pointI just think your justification is coming under a false impression of the female nature and ignores any instinctual desire to have kids
>>18479511>wypipo should stop having choldren>but not bipocs because that be'z razizthanks dr. Kirshenbaum, you are our greatest ally
>>18480066Who are you quoting?
>>18480066>white people do x>brown people do y>GUYS GUYS WE SHOULD DO Y LIKE THE BROWNS GUYS GUYS WE SHOULD BE MORE LIKE THE BROWNS
What if Hitler didn't invade Poland, but actually focused on normal development?
>>18481781>Not even Francos regime was able to stop democratization.The Franco Regime regime fell apart because Franco's only serious successor, Luis Carrero Blanco, became an unwilling member of the Basque space program. If it wasn't for the ETA there was a very high chance that the regime would have carried on at least into the eighties. Also, the King was a liberal-ish playboy who didn't want to actually rule and preferred liberalism because it allowed him to fuck around as a figurehead. That was the core reason for democratization.
>>18482066It's a shame, too. Because Franquist spain could have actually carried on, which Portugal couldn't. I think having a reactionary regime (besides South Africa) during the late cold war could have been very interesting.
>>18482066well I just used Franco as one example.You can take the other pseudo-fascist regimes under Metaxas and Salazar as another example.
>>18478825Silesia is German.Danzig is German.Pomerania is German.Poland is German.
>>18482156>Pic rel shows number of years each area has been controlled by a Polish state
Why didn't the Jews behead Jesus like they did John the Baptist and then throw away the head? It would've made it a lot harder for his groupies to fake his "resurrection"
They only beheaded John because Herods daughter asked for it specifically
>>18482135it would have made his actual resurection cooler though anon.
A reminder Japan owes China for giving them civilization, kind of like how Northern Europe owes Ancient Greece and RomeOtherwise they'd still be living in mudhuts
Japan further refined an already refined part of Chinese culture, that being the small pocket around Shanghai. Comparing Japanese culture to Chinese culture is comparing grapes to wine.
>>18482115>If we hadn't invented it slightly earlier, you would never have invented it
>>18482143>slightly earlierchinese invented their shit like 3,000 BCjaps imported it in the Asuka period, 600AD.
Which us why China got raped and humiliated by Whites while the Japanese always ruled over themselves?
>>18482159Whites pushed japs' shit in too, they just had the foresight to immediately realize how outmatched they were and learn from it. Americans literally just rolled up and blew their shit up. That's how they rapidly industrialized after being isolated for centuries and then were able to challenge the russians just a half century later. Chinks meanwhile were too far up their own asses with pride, so they kept getting humiliated.
We can conceive of an object that is physically identical to a chair but lacks the chairness of the chair, therefore the chairness of the chair is an immaterial Platonic object.
Everything is a chair if you are brave enough
>>18481848Glad it offended you enough to respond. My work is done here.
>>18481857me when i say something stupid but claim it was ragebait after the fact
>>18481774>So is consciousness the essence or definition of what it means to be human?Why would it need to be? I never said it was.
>>18481588>chair: a seat typically having four legs and a back for one person.In a world without people to sit on chairs, would chairs continue being chairs despite no longer being able to serve their function? Or, if a collection of atoms spontaneously arranged into the shape of a chair on a distant planet where no one would ever have the opportunity to sit on it, would that still count as a chair?
