What if you born in his body in after the July Crisis? What would you do?
>>18552341July was already too late, AH could only have avoided a Europe-wide war (which they would 100% lose, the AH army was shit and they had to watch 4 fucking fronts) if they attacked immediately in June before they wasted time with an ultimatum and Russia stepped up to help the Serbs.At that point, the best move would have been to shoot Franz Joseph and hope that Charles would be able to negotiate some relatively okay deal.
>>18553951>the AH army was shitIt wasn't that bad. The issue army split between three (Imperial Habsburgers force, Army of Hungary, and the common army)Secondly, the most fuck up thing is the man giving out information to Russia.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYT7qgLHJpk
>>18552341He have a sigma foreskin left on Earth before Europe lost it right to globalist bankers
is there literally any timeline where a retarded multi ethnic empire like austro-hungary could have survived beyond the invention of nationalism
>>18553600Considering as the empire mostly catholic.
What period and place in European history was the peak for cleavage?
>>18555289As they should. Those are her husband's and babies tits now. Also once a woman starts producing milk, arousal, shock, or baby sounds will make her spray milk if she is full.
>>18555400Seriously. Its getting there, most women don't care if they nip at this point. I see camel toe anytime the weather gets nice.
>>18554801Women with pancake tits need to induce lactation to help them fill in. Most women have not had proper sexual stimulation so they don't develop right. Any woman with flappy tits needs some milk.
>>18555410
>>18554620I don't even particularly care all that much for big massive tits but cleavage sure does grab the eye, thus confirming my hypothesis that it's a fake ass signal (source: I made it up)
What are the historical reasons for the invincible power of BOLSHEVISM to crush, rape and genocide nazi gangsters without mercy in one of the most one-sided conflict in history?
>>18551982>What are the historical reasons20million+ dead and a reminder that there will always be more of us who hate fascism than the minority who get swept up in it. we will always unite and kill the fascists till they commit suicide like little bitches they are outside the hole in the ground they're hiding in.
>>18551982Daily Slavic affirmation thread>slav are human>nazis were wrong>poland is a real country
>>18555112>the economy was unchanged from 1890 to 1939Well played. I took the bait.
>>18555118Ukraine said they would drone Warsaw if they complained about Ukrainian fascism again.Warsaw has since been silent.Fascism won.
Russia had absolutely nothing going for it except a large population under arms. They had decent tanks but those were essentially stolen from german designs. If Stalin had tried to attack Germany first, he would have lost just like in 1914. Anyways this is stupid trolling shit like all the commielarp posts
>you see nordic aryans managed to establish civilizations across the middle east, south asia and southern europe>except in their own lands which remained a frozen/forested shithole
>>18554243A cognate for "aryan" corresponding something akin to noble exists in many IE languages at least, so that bullshit about ummm sweaty Aryan only means Iranian is a load of shit, and a modern artificial classification (the lowland Scots and even German for Irish for example seems suspiciously cognate for "Arische"), yes Iranians called themselves "Aryan" in Iranian doesn't mean other groups didn't
>>18554508>Ummm sweaty window was only ever used by Modern English speakers, no other groups ever called it any sort of etymologically related word or cognate so only 1900s wall holes with glass in them are windows
>>18554521It's entirely cognate to IE (+Indo-Aryan so on so forth) and the modern linguistic usage is the "artificial" one as a handy catch all term for one branch coming from that root, many Indo-European(/Iranian etc) languages have a similar cognate ethonym
>>18554382Newgrange is not a good example though, built by the farmers who got genocided (EEF/ANF like admixture in "Celts"/BB/whatever the fuck is "pre-Insular" AFAIK)
>>18555432>It's just endless fractal layers of horseniggers conquering settled people to the southwestEven happened with "Asiatic" steppe nomads into Europe several times. Hell if you go deeper it even happens on a finer resolution, like Britain having about 600 years of various Dane(ish) ousting the previous roughly Dane(ish) ruling class
At first glance they despise feminism and and everything that seeks to even imply women should be equal to men. Either a sort of benevolent sexism or thinly veiled misoginy.But they also quite happy to drool to powerful female figures (Joan of Arc and Saint Olga of Kiev first come to mind) as long as they share their faith. Whenever they are brought up, any suggestion that women should be quiet and submissive is often ridiculed and treated as LARPing.What gives?It often reads like trad christians have a repressed femdom and/or mommy fetish.
More respectful / egalitarian than other trad ideologies, but at the end of the day Paul is quite clear women need to sit down and stop yapping.
>>18555314Paul was the Antichrist who has damned most Christians for following his "Pauline Christianity" which explicitly contradicts what Jesus told his followers about their obligations to the laws of the Tanach.Matthew 5:18>For I assure you: Until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or one stroke of a letter will pass from the law until all things are accomplished
>>18555295First of all you sound like a tranny for using terms like girlbossing. In fact 100% of all new age modern man ideas is like it came from black rap music industry and culture that was ran through planned parenthood and democrat political conventions on how to make black people’s sins more inclusive. So not just trannies but black trannies because that is more minority than just tranny.Christians say Amen when we pray. It means So Be It. But we all know it means we are men. Men going to heaven. Men who are all made men by God’s grace, filling us with the moral courage to be men, no matter who we are. Men should be men just as God is a trinity. He created woman too but He is still a Father. Joan of Arc, all those saints are Roman Catholic except in the case of someone like Saint Patrick, who the Roman Catholics sainted for theirselves but he was really just a believing christian who shared the gospel. Roman Catholics differ from Christianity in that they didn’t obey Jesus Christ’s commandment to share the gospel. They instead murdered their way around the globe and said their church is “Christ.” Then they created This: >>18555348You kill little boys like in Star Wars to make statements as insane as this. That verse you quoted from Matthew means this and this only. That Jesus Christ IS the fulfillment of the whole law. His sacrifice and believer’s acceptance of him and nonbeliever’s rejection of him is the dividing sword that separates those saved from being already condemned, from those already condemned to go to hell. Jesus Christ fulfilled it all. It doesn’t need your church’s help. It never needed jews, Roman Catholics, or Islam doing your rituals. It isn’t kept by you. It is actually just the Antichrist.Furthermore, throwing illegal immigrants out of America isn’t the same as crusades. The earth will swallow up your children of the dragon he floods us with. For the earth is vast.
We defeated the Antichrist , Satan, hell, death, sin, the devil and all his demons, by the Word of Our Testimony, the blood of the lamb, and never lived a perfect life.Because Satan wanted to stand over his enemy and believe he had won before God strikes his lights out like Cain stood over Abel.So basically Christians get to have this life still, it just isn’t perfect because Satan is gay. But we also get the next life.◄ Revelation 12:11 ►And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
Did Iberians, Italians, or Greeks ever historically see themselves as the same race or at least brotherhood as Northern Europeans like the Anglo-Germanics? Or did they associate themselves more with West Asians, North Africans, and even South Asian people?
>>18554126Originally italians and greeks were black Af with tremendous BBCs. And this is how they managed to build many civilizations. But then the whites began invading and raped the original black italians and greeks into a mulatto race. So they stopped being black astaghfirullah.
>>18554126bump
>>18554126Anglos and Germanics saw themselves as ''brothers'' so much that in both World Wars they were enemies
>>18554126One thing historically to keep in mind is the historically until sometime in the 1500s that europe were focused around the mediterranean and that also the mediterranean was what gave shape to empire until trade gradually shifted to holland and england and france had a few wars around that time but prior to that europe was pointed at the mediterranean as what largely situated the relations between states
>>18554126Our trve brothers are Somalia and Burundi.t.Spaniard
was there a particular moment in your history program when you realized that your classes were trying to teach politically approved narratives rather than make you a competent student?
>>18555848imagine the absolute wreck of a human that decided to put together and teach this course
I was raised by a paranoid schizophrenic who always always told me that if someone is telling you something or doing something, its because they have an agenda, so I already went into university with the mindset of expecting that people are trying to manipulate me. It's a bad mindset to have, but a broken clock is also right twice a day. Not perfectly so, but sufficiently so.1. College kids are young, dumb and impressionable. They have also never seriously thought about anything.2. College profs teach the same stale biased perspectives evolutionarily selected via peer pressure and government/private grants.3. College students imbibe these perspective uncritically and mistake exploring the walled garden they are in for genuine intellectual exploration.4. These college kids eventually become the next generation of profs perpetuating the same set of stale old perspectives. My obsessive desire to form my own perspective and not succumb to the interpretations the materials I was being taught pointed to helped me retain my independence and develop genuine critical analytical thinking, and what is more, synthetic thinking. I still believe that my chuddy views are correct, too, in contrast to the stale old stuff I was being taught. But I don't think the university system is intentionally designed to propagandise people any more, I think it just works that way functionally because of its low adaptability, no access to new perspectives, selective pressures from funding sources and government, pressures from ideological lecturers, and even pressures from the student body itself.
>>18555925mark is a career leftist parasite whose sole, publicly funded, job is socializing young people into marxism while writing books glamorizing it. The problem isn't that marxist study groups exist, it's that they are being pipelined to ordinary people under the guise of being pseudo academichttps://www.sfu.ca/history/faculty-and-staff/faculty-by-name/mark-leier.html
This can come about in a couple different ways. 1. Oliver Cromwell does not contract malaria and fortunately continues living2. He is able to find an actual successor instead of picking his son at the eleventh hourand then if the Protectorate remains and ergo Parliament is wholly subdued, what happens next. I have a couple of theories1. With Cromwell dealing the death blow of British Feudalism and clearly caring more about Capital development, we get an earlier British Empire with Ireland nearly wholly cleansed and turned into a proper colony alongside even more focus on the America's, particularly New England becoming even more of a hot spot2. With Congregationalism surviving in such a powerful form, it becomes the dominant version of Protestantism (fun fact btw, you can count all Congregationalist leaders on one hand, both Oliver and Richard Cromwell, both John and John Quincy Adams and finally Calvin Coolidge) or at least an equal to Lutheranism or Presbyterianism. Possibly a more focused war against Catholicism with the Spanish Empire possibly dissolving quicker and a successful destruction of the Catholic Church/Massive Catholic setbacks if a campaign with the New Modal Army is successful. 3. With this increased amount of Capital development and destruction of Feudal institutions, Capitalism rises even faster and as such we could have Communist revolutions even earlier. Such as the Paris Commune being in 1787 even. Again I think theres a lot of redmeat on the bones of this alt hist, much more than Le WW1 or WW2"
>>18554657>not declaring for the king and attacking protestants might have been a good startBut they had already declared for the King by the time the English civil war started. Cromwell and his lot were going to attack them anyway, there was no action they could make to avoid that. The attacks on Protestants began following attacks on Catholics.>the irish were not loyal to any kings Charles I promised the Graces to the Irish Catholic nobility in the 1620s. The 1641 coup was in order to seize the government until they were finally granted. Following the collapse of the Gaelic order after the Flight of the Earls, the remaining nobility saw the Stuarts as the best path to ending Catholic persecution.again, Cromwell was going to attack them anyway.
>>18552317Not a single foreskin left on Earth.
>>18552317>hey /his/ write fiction for me in greentext formatNo. Write it yourself or find a novel to read.
>>18555130If you stopped attacking protestants and prostrated yourselves before us begging for forgiveness, MAYBE just maybe, we might have let you live. Scum.
>>18556003isn't england mostly catholic now?
In the ancient world, Greek was the international language of educated people. Every single time somebody wrote about Jesus before 100 AD they wrote His Name as Iesous every single time with no exceptions, other than abbreviations like IU. 100% of the time His Name is only written as exactly Iesous across all contemporary sources. Iesous was changed to Iesus in Latin and then Jesus in English. It is likely a Greek version of Yeshu or Yeshua or Yahoshua, which is a reference to YHWH. The name YHWH appears more than any name in the Bible but it is stripped of its vowels so nobody knows the full name of God. The two biggest guesses are Yahweh and Yehowah (Jehovah). The name isa was made up over 600 years later lol.
>>18555863Arab Christians call him Yasu. It's not clear why the Quran calls him Isa, the most compelling theory I've seen is that Muhammad altered the name to make it a rhyming pair with Musa(Moses), there are quite a few of these in the Quran.
>>18555863You're just scratching the surface. The name Jesus is made up in an effort to historicize him. The oldest manuscripts only used nomina sacra. The truth is that an abbreviation such as ΙΣ can stand for something else.The Quran's Isa is bizarre, but it must go back to the nomina sacra ΙΣ.
>>18555891If you wanna get deeper then yes ΙΣ is how they first wrote His Name before Iesous but ΙΣ can be an abbreviated version of Iesous. If you want to go deeper then, originally His Name was only spoken orally for the first 20 years before ever being written by the pen as far as evience concerns. But, if His Name were really something other than Iesous, why is there no written document calling Him something other than Iesous or ΙΣ from the time and place? Lol.
>>18555999There's this theory that ΙΣ is just a transliteration of the Hebrew word for man. אִישׁ • (ish). Then these stories about "Jesus" were originally about an anonymous supernatural man, probably meant to be identified with Yahweh. Early readers would see these stories as belonging to the same literary tradition of Genesis 18 or the time Jacob wrestled an "angel".>The "angel" in question is referred to as "man" (אִישׁ: Ish) and "God" (אֵל: El) in Genesis,At some point editors of the manuscripts wanted to merge this character with the name of Joshua, so later revisions started to reflect that.
can he be trusted?
>>18549146He's a linguist and hobby larper. You can trust him in the sense that he's a well meaning amateur.I haven't watched his videos in ages though, at some point he started doing nothing but eat bait for content and that's boring
>>18555703well, I'm just glad /his/ isn't worshipping him even if he changed his politic point of you (or was he a ll along but didn't say shit about it?), /his/ calls his video bullshit whoch is good
>>18549146No, he is a crypto kike
>>18555906>even if he changed his politic point of you (or was he a ll along but didn't say shit about it?I think he was always like this but when he realized he could get more views with politics adjacent historical topics and responding to ragebait his politics naturally came to the forefront.
>>18555955I might agree with you
Why are Americans adopting the religion of their Latinx "invaders" to kick them out? LOL. Their ancestors are rolling in their graves, meanwhile us Hispanic Catholic Chads will continue to overtake their demographics until you won't find a parish that speaks English at all.
>>18555917So, if anything, you're adopting the religion of your white invaders and are a Tío Tomas for doing it
>>18555932You could have just said that evangelicalism, SSPX Roman Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity are brown.
>>18555950Not reallyI think most latinos are leaving catholicism and becoming agnostic/atheist and white conservatives are leaving protestantism for more conservative churches
for all the complaints about 'skin worship' from the latinx e-caths re: racist white catholics they really do just replace whiteness with latinxness don't they.you have to be deep into the corn/coca-cola-induced diabetic brain damage to think anglos converting to catholicism is exclusively a latinx win lol
>>18555850unpopular opinion but cathlarpers are no better than the paganlarpers they love to clown on
Why is liking preteen girls considered weird / unnatural?
>>18555648why would those cause 14 year olds to go back to joining the workforce?
>>18555661Basically the pension model will crash soon. Keeping young people out of the workforce for decades will no longer be viable. States needs more tax-payers and the university model is crashing.
it's just gay and dumb
>>18553366kek
>>18551352This and>>18553276More importantly , this. One small correction though; the world is ruled by bitter old hags THROUGH THEIR HUSBANDS who are powerful members of society; who fail to discipline their wives because they are desperate simps; social consensus is then established by the powers that be against the most natural pairing of all ; the sensitive young 33 year old man and the 14 year old virgin girl.
What happens to kings and princes once the monarchy is overthrown? Do they even have enough skills to get a job as private citizens?
>>18555968Anon, Britain's royal family has been a German family for centuries. At another time they were French. They shelter one another because they are monarchs and they want monarchy to survive. Most countries don't have royal families that are native to the country they're in charge of.
>>18555958>Do they even have enough skills to get a job as private citizens?No. I don't know if you've ever watched one of those "direct descendant of king daily life" reports, but those people are unbelievably degenerate. They have no skills and no hobby. They just sit on their asses and read gossip magazines all day while getting waited on by unattractive maids as they slowly bleed out money because the only thing they fear more than going broke is selling those decrepit castles they sit on.
>>18555958>What happens to kings and princes once the monarchy is overthrown?they steal everything that isn't nailed down, flee to another country, invest the money they escaped with, then live as socialites
>>18555974tbf he was Tsar as a child and only for a few years. When he came back to be Prime Minister he was in his 60s, so he had plenty of experience not being a monarch.
>>18555985you can't invest stolen money.
Why did Western Indo-Europeans abandon pastoralism in favor of agriculture? Even Bronze Age cultures like Unetice, the Nordic Bronze Age, and later Iron Age cultures like Hallstatt, La Tene, Tumulus, etc., already had agriculture as their main means of subsistence.
>>18554968Take your meds
>>18555699Concession accepted
>>18554966Ok i lost you btfo me
>aire isn't related >but aire is actually related
>>18555986That is correct. Several words of different origins can have a degree of overlap.https://dil.ie/search?q=aire&search_in=headword>2 aire>n io, m. oire, ere m. IGT Decl. § 2 . load, burden: An Aryan is not a "load" or "burden".An Aryan is not "act of guarding, watching over, tending, caring for".Brb. I'm going out into the field to pick flours.Later I'm going to bake a cake with flowers.
How come neighbour turned against neighbour in a place where everyone viewed themselves as the same identity, a state they had long envisioned, and something the people today still believe would work out if it was given a second chance?What caused the sudden hostility to the point of genocide and war against each others, and why wouldnt it happen again if they tried a second time to unite?
>>18551081>GermanyThis is, however, true. It is precisely Germans, Italians and Turks who pushed for divisions, and who inevitably created a whole new ethnicity due to Islam (Bosniaks).Serbia and Croatia didn't have a single war between them since invading the Balkans as two close tribes in the 8th century, until the 20th century.Meanwhile, Germany united a bunch of medieval kingdoms of different faiths (protestant and catholic), different phenotypes, different genetics. Italy did the same. Turkey did the same. France did the same. Spain did the same.
>>18555721Jews were able to unite 3 different races, dozens of different ethnicities and even different branches of the same religion under one identity and one nation, all while surrounded by enemies. I can't say it's not impressive.Even Germans and Italians and Spaniards managed to do this, but we haven't, and my suspicion as the cause of this is simply communism instead of nationalism. To form a new national identity, like a new German identity or a new Italian identity, where previously were a dozens of different identities all genetically, religiously and even culturally distant, you need nationalism.Communism (which is Jewish) instead places emphasis on class differences. It doesn't just destroy the creation of a new national identity, it damages the already existing one (as it did in the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia). It further balkanizes the previous nation.What Yugoslavia (I'm excluding Slovenia, Kosovo and Macedonia for practical purposes) has is really regional diversity: But Balkans is very diverse, so you'll find the folowing:Slavonian Croats and Serbs from Vojvodina will genetically have less distance between them than, say, a Croat from Herzegovina would to a Slavonian Croat or a Serb from Southern Serbia would to a Serb from Vojvodina. While a Croatian from Dalmatia would be more similar to a Croatian from Herzegovina and a Serb from Republika Srpska. And a Serb from Republika Srpska would genetically be more similar to Serbs from Montenegro or Central Serbia than to a Serb from Vojvodina.There is A LOT of diversity within said national identities, i.e. a lot of geographical diversity within different ethnicities. It is not uncommon to have greater genetic differences within said nations than between
>>18555721There is no evidence that the average Croat held particular animosity towards the Serbs to the point of actively wanting to kill them. Croats and Serbs lived in these areas together for centuries without any quarrel.
>>18550981>>18550962>>18550978>>18551251>>18550994retard awards go to you. i love when retards keep repeating the same shit with zero research on the topic.>muh economic crisis>muh serbs and croats always hated each other (history started lasted century)>muh different identities (unlike our country)
>>18555962>muh serbs and croats always hated each other (history started lasted century)He's wrong but not that wrong. Who gives a shit if we did not hate each other up until the last century. History doesn't end in the 19th century either, and guess what matters to Serbs and Croats. last 100 years or the previous 1400 or so before that? What's fresher in memory?
