can he be trusted?
>>18549146He's a linguist and hobby larper. You can trust him in the sense that he's a well meaning amateur.I haven't watched his videos in ages though, at some point he started doing nothing but eat bait for content and that's boring
>>18555703well, I'm just glad /his/ isn't worshipping him even if he changed his politic point of you (or was he a ll along but didn't say shit about it?), /his/ calls his video bullshit whoch is good
>>18549146No, he is a crypto kike
>>18555906>even if he changed his politic point of you (or was he a ll along but didn't say shit about it?I think he was always like this but when he realized he could get more views with politics adjacent historical topics and responding to ragebait his politics naturally came to the forefront.
>>18555955I might agree with you
Why are Americans adopting the religion of their Latinx "invaders" to kick them out? LOL. Their ancestors are rolling in their graves, meanwhile us Hispanic Catholic Chads will continue to overtake their demographics until you won't find a parish that speaks English at all.
>>18555917So, if anything, you're adopting the religion of your white invaders and are a Tío Tomas for doing it
>>18555932You could have just said that evangelicalism, SSPX Roman Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity are brown.
>>18555950Not reallyI think most latinos are leaving catholicism and becoming agnostic/atheist and white conservatives are leaving protestantism for more conservative churches
for all the complaints about 'skin worship' from the latinx e-caths re: racist white catholics they really do just replace whiteness with latinxness don't they.you have to be deep into the corn/coca-cola-induced diabetic brain damage to think anglos converting to catholicism is exclusively a latinx win lol
>>18555850unpopular opinion but cathlarpers are no better than the paganlarpers they love to clown on
Why is liking preteen girls considered weird / unnatural?
>>18555648why would those cause 14 year olds to go back to joining the workforce?
>>18555661Basically the pension model will crash soon. Keeping young people out of the workforce for decades will no longer be viable. States needs more tax-payers and the university model is crashing.
it's just gay and dumb
>>18553366kek
>>18551352This and>>18553276More importantly , this. One small correction though; the world is ruled by bitter old hags THROUGH THEIR HUSBANDS who are powerful members of society; who fail to discipline their wives because they are desperate simps; social consensus is then established by the powers that be against the most natural pairing of all ; the sensitive young 33 year old man and the 14 year old virgin girl.
What happens to kings and princes once the monarchy is overthrown? Do they even have enough skills to get a job as private citizens?
>>18555968Anon, Britain's royal family has been a German family for centuries. At another time they were French. They shelter one another because they are monarchs and they want monarchy to survive. Most countries don't have royal families that are native to the country they're in charge of.
>>18555958>Do they even have enough skills to get a job as private citizens?No. I don't know if you've ever watched one of those "direct descendant of king daily life" reports, but those people are unbelievably degenerate. They have no skills and no hobby. They just sit on their asses and read gossip magazines all day while getting waited on by unattractive maids as they slowly bleed out money because the only thing they fear more than going broke is selling those decrepit castles they sit on.
>>18555958>What happens to kings and princes once the monarchy is overthrown?they steal everything that isn't nailed down, flee to another country, invest the money they escaped with, then live as socialites
>>18555974tbf he was Tsar as a child and only for a few years. When he came back to be Prime Minister he was in his 60s, so he had plenty of experience not being a monarch.
>>18555985you can't invest stolen money.
Why did Western Indo-Europeans abandon pastoralism in favor of agriculture? Even Bronze Age cultures like Unetice, the Nordic Bronze Age, and later Iron Age cultures like Hallstatt, La Tene, Tumulus, etc., already had agriculture as their main means of subsistence.
>>18554968Take your meds
>>18555699Concession accepted
>>18554966Ok i lost you btfo me
>aire isn't related >but aire is actually related
>>18555986That is correct. Several words of different origins can have a degree of overlap.https://dil.ie/search?q=aire&search_in=headword>2 aire>n io, m. oire, ere m. IGT Decl. § 2 . load, burden: An Aryan is not a "load" or "burden".An Aryan is not "act of guarding, watching over, tending, caring for".Brb. I'm going out into the field to pick flours.Later I'm going to bake a cake with flowers.
How come neighbour turned against neighbour in a place where everyone viewed themselves as the same identity, a state they had long envisioned, and something the people today still believe would work out if it was given a second chance?What caused the sudden hostility to the point of genocide and war against each others, and why wouldnt it happen again if they tried a second time to unite?
>>18551081>GermanyThis is, however, true. It is precisely Germans, Italians and Turks who pushed for divisions, and who inevitably created a whole new ethnicity due to Islam (Bosniaks).Serbia and Croatia didn't have a single war between them since invading the Balkans as two close tribes in the 8th century, until the 20th century.Meanwhile, Germany united a bunch of medieval kingdoms of different faiths (protestant and catholic), different phenotypes, different genetics. Italy did the same. Turkey did the same. France did the same. Spain did the same.
>>18555721Jews were able to unite 3 different races, dozens of different ethnicities and even different branches of the same religion under one identity and one nation, all while surrounded by enemies. I can't say it's not impressive.Even Germans and Italians and Spaniards managed to do this, but we haven't, and my suspicion as the cause of this is simply communism instead of nationalism. To form a new national identity, like a new German identity or a new Italian identity, where previously were a dozens of different identities all genetically, religiously and even culturally distant, you need nationalism.Communism (which is Jewish) instead places emphasis on class differences. It doesn't just destroy the creation of a new national identity, it damages the already existing one (as it did in the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia). It further balkanizes the previous nation.What Yugoslavia (I'm excluding Slovenia, Kosovo and Macedonia for practical purposes) has is really regional diversity: But Balkans is very diverse, so you'll find the folowing:Slavonian Croats and Serbs from Vojvodina will genetically have less distance between them than, say, a Croat from Herzegovina would to a Slavonian Croat or a Serb from Southern Serbia would to a Serb from Vojvodina. While a Croatian from Dalmatia would be more similar to a Croatian from Herzegovina and a Serb from Republika Srpska. And a Serb from Republika Srpska would genetically be more similar to Serbs from Montenegro or Central Serbia than to a Serb from Vojvodina.There is A LOT of diversity within said national identities, i.e. a lot of geographical diversity within different ethnicities. It is not uncommon to have greater genetic differences within said nations than between
>>18555721There is no evidence that the average Croat held particular animosity towards the Serbs to the point of actively wanting to kill them. Croats and Serbs lived in these areas together for centuries without any quarrel.
>>18550981>>18550962>>18550978>>18551251>>18550994retard awards go to you. i love when retards keep repeating the same shit with zero research on the topic.>muh economic crisis>muh serbs and croats always hated each other (history started lasted century)>muh different identities (unlike our country)
>>18555962>muh serbs and croats always hated each other (history started lasted century)He's wrong but not that wrong. Who gives a shit if we did not hate each other up until the last century. History doesn't end in the 19th century either, and guess what matters to Serbs and Croats. last 100 years or the previous 1400 or so before that? What's fresher in memory?
You say that Levantines or Nafris for instance are Arabs because "they have Arab culture and language". If this is the only criteria that matters then why can't Mexicans be considered as part of the European world? They have a European language and the Spanish European culture. They blast Spanish music from their cars the same way a Syrian blasts Arab music. So what's the difference?Why would a Spaniard see a Mexican as a foreign alien if a Saudi does not see a Moroccan as a foreign alien?
>>18555686>>18555701>>18555704>>18555732This thread and other threads similar to it in diction and style are made by a paki living in bradford who hates british people and shias.He literally makes 2-3 of these threads per day and posts them on /his/ and /pol/. They are written with correct diction, capitalisation and are always asking rhetorical "gotcha" questions to try to own whites and pretend muslims treat each other all the same or that shias are hypocrites or whatever.He currently has over four threads in the catalog.
well spics are considered latinx and hispanic despite not being white. same principle. arabs would never claim to be "arabian" (hejazi, nejdi) unless making an ancestral claim similar to latinx whites claiming to be spanish
>>18555704>Did the Arabs during the Caliphate have a caste system similar to the Spanish empire in their American colonies?Yes, they did have one of sorts. Tribes that had converted earlier to Islam during Muhammad's time were considered superior than those who had only been converted recently under the sword, which was later replicated by Indian Muslims as to co-opt the caste system favor of upper caste converts.
>>18555686Because to outside groups, Arabs, Levants etc. are indistinguishable. Whilst the difference between Spain and Spanish and South America and South Americans is night and day, a few majority white areas not withstanding. Genetically they're much more distinct too.
THIS THREAD IS THE SUM OF ALL THE STUPIDITIES.
I think men of any given society end up being a lot more patriotic and sacrificial to their society if that given society has a lot more modest, faithful, non-degenerate women. Any examples & counterexamples to this conjecture?>FranceEven back in the day when France was known for it's harlotry, the men who did all the fighting seemed to have been predominantly ruralites with deep religious roots and whose women were far more modest than urbanites.
>>18553449>The second most hardcore group of Muslims (after only ISIS) aren’t real MuslimsRight….
>>18554052nta, but they're more pashtun coded than islam coded and by pashtun cutoms, stoning cheating women and beheading the sneaky fucker is totally normal
bumpu
>>18553309>They do bring their women later after landing stable enough jobs or sources of income though.So what? Its hardly patriotism to flee your country for a better one, so le modest women aren't creating it.
>>18555965um... aren't they anti-taliban or le anti bad guys who're fleeing
It's July the 1st, let's discuss the Battle of Gettysburg over the following days>experiences walking the battlefield>favorite events from the battle>how the battle could've went/alt history>fighting units and their involvementlet's make this thread last until the third
Joshua Chamberlain and Little Round Top get all the hype but George “Pappy” Greene and Culp’s Hill played just as big a role on the other Union flank. He was one of the oldest generals on either side and had stepped away from the regular army to build railroads. Maybe that eye for engineering led him to have his men dig in, and they held off Confederate assaults by superior numbers.
>It's July the 1st, let's discuss the Battle of Gettysburg over the following days>>experiences walking the battlefield>>favorite events from the battle>>how the battle could've went/alt history>>fighting units and their involvement>let's make this thread last until the third
>>18555805OP here, I'm pro-Confederate by el waye
>>18555909That a joke
So when exactly did mesopotamia levant and egypt get fully arabized?Had most of the ethnic identities in the region already dissapeared under roman and persian rule?
maybe in syria, elsewhere no
>>18555957Did people in egypt consider themselves egyptians and not romans or greeks?
Imagine how much better the world would be if kingdom of France had liberated North America and India from greedy anglo-saxon imperialists
>>18551415>why does a royalist image not use a republican mascotretard
>>18555117>Less population = less illiterate people getting counted in the numbers = higher literacy rates>More population = more illiterate people getting counted in the numbers = less literacy ratesThat's not how that works.
>>18555337Haiti was the richest place in America when (pre revolution) frogs were in charge.
>>18552405>The Franco-Russian alliance, or the Dual Entente as it came to be called, divided Europe into two armed camps in the decade before 1914. For ten years before 1914, it tended to stabilize rather than endanger the tranquillity of the Continent. France felt secure against Germany, and Russia believed that it had obtained greater assurance than before. Both countries saw the alliance as a means of countering the challenge given by British imperial policy outside Europe, and there were actually occasions in 1894 and 1895 when the Franco-Russian alliance made common cause with Germany against Great Britain.Holy moly, Bongs would get raped.
>>18555514Not per capita. It was a giant sugar plantation full of niggers who worked tirelessly so it produced a lot of wealth but it's also the reason it was niggerhell.
I wanted to learn more about. National Socialist theory, but instead I spent 2 days struggling to understand this rambling mess. Hitler frequently wanders into long and unnecessary digressions, repeats points ad nauseam, and writes sentences that are often unnecessarily long and convoluted.1.5/10. Worst book I’ve read in a while
>>18553454>If the ruler is incompetentTo add to this, how many times did Hitler opposed the ideas of his officer staff? Hmm... Too many to count. Part of his genius, I assume? 1488D chess once more?
>>18553438>The white race was holding Hitler backWow.
>>18552227Yeah the guy's a fucking retard. Really says something about everyone who buys into that shit.
>>18552227>Read crap written by a schizo painter without a hs degreeread the doctrine of fascism by giovanni gentile, which was a philosopher and a university professor
>>18552227national socialism was whatever hitler happened to feel like that day. it's not really coherent
is it true its hard to get into the world of Philosophy as a woman? I'm thinking about doing it but I know its a male dominated space.. mostly academia... is it crazy bad, or bearable?
>>18555594>You don't leave so much aware of how capitalism pushed gender equality forward an astonishing amountthat sounds like a feminist discourse I would listen to! and gender studies is absolutely the discipline for addressing such serious topics. my uni destroyed the faculty down to two people from twenty. the sociology dept was also cut down to single digits. that limits the scope of the subjects, and it's criminal vandalism. universities are degree factories now and all of these subjects while consciousness expanding, are vanishing.>I will always object to [gender studies] because we should have much more methodological and rigorous disciplines addressing such serious topicsother subjects do not discuss these topics at all, some of them briefly gloss over it. these are qualitative topics anon, you're not doing a double blind randomised clinical trial on why housewives were depressed drunks post war. all academia is rigorous discipline and you sound a bit judgemental of the way a subject is run rather than the content which is strong.
>>18555622>gender studies is absolutely the discipline for addressing such serious topicsI love how you phrased that. Yes. It's something gender studies should be addressing.>other subjects do not discuss these topics at allSure they are. Postmodern philosophy basically trademarked deconstruction and then licensed it to marxist sociology. That's the source of the most riveting social commentaries that gender studies are trying to follow up on. And there are objections to be made against pomo and sociological/neomarxist deconstructionism too, but for what it's worth, they are much more thorough than your average gender studies publication. If I wanted something digestable, captivating and surface-level enough to post on instagram, I'd listen to a good podcast. The expectations I have from academia are much higher. More than half of the philosophy books I read meet these standards and I rarely came across a gender studies publication that did.
>>18555634that is an interesting perspective and I'd take reccomendations of podcasts. I had to read masculinities by raewyn connell in gender studies and that was valuable as a man but I did also get some of that in sociology so I accept there are multiple paths to the same knowledge. I think we all need solidarity to be honest because there are business majors who are basically sociopaths compared to us in the humanities and social sciences. peace be with you anon
>>18552407The first step is to stop posting here
>>18555737And with your spirit
Previous thread: >>18541019The last thread was too interesting to let die. If anyone was there, let's continue the discussion. I was not OP of that thread, but I contend his assessment was essentially correct: belief in an immortal soul that goes to a realm of conscious joy after death looks to be something either imported or innovated sometime in the intertestamental period since there's hardly a trace, and arguably explicit contradiction, of such a notion in the canon Hebrew scriptures.
>>18553843Except Jesus says Lazarus is straight chilling with Abraham, while the rich man is parched and suffering flame.Like, say "it's just a parable" all you want.Jesus used the parable of the workers of the vineyard to refer to something which actually happened, it allegorically points to reality.You're simply not applying his logic consistently.
>>18551731>Did you forget the part where Jesus said the end of the worldHere's something extremely important to keep in mind: it doesn't say the end of the world. It says the end of the age. The end of that age, and the beginning of the Messianic era. It never says the end of the world.>would come once the gospel was preached to *every* nation?There's a difference between all and what we would write here as *ALL* or *EVERY*. Your asterisks effectively make it a different word that specifies "100%, no exceptions". The Bible's equivalent of your asterisks would generally be something like "every between the east and west" or "every under heaven" or a similar qualifier. You can look at the word Mark 3:10 uses for "all" here at https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/g3956/kjv/tr/0-1/ and see it isn't functioning as "*all*" with asterisk qualifiers would. Like in Matthew 2:3 does it mean *all* Jerusalem was troubled, even the babies who didn't understand anything about the Wise Men? Or most especially Mark 4:34 "when they were alone, he expounded all things to his disciples". Obviously this can't mean *all*. He expounded the life history of the 144,261,195th slug that was ever born to them? P:So taking in the normal sense, this was done by 70 AD. You had Christians from Ethiopia to India by then. All nations in the known Roman world had heard it.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18552849That's about the resurrection, as it explicitly says. "Second coming" is a misnomer: Jesus has come many times. He came to Abraham and had a meal, he came to Jacob and wrestled. And, following his earthly ministry, he was to come multiple times in the future as well. One was with the angels to usher in the Messianic era and this, as a matter of solid verifiable history, happened literally, an actual army of angels surrounded Jerusalem prior to its 70 AD destruction and this is part of what got the Christians to escape to safety: https://tektonticker.blogspot.com/2022/05/today-i-have-special-guest-piece-by.htmlThe resurrection will be another coming. He'll probably also come when the Temple is rebuilt. He comes many times both in the past and in the future.
Jesus didn't rise and he's never coming back. It's time for you anons to grow up and stop the fairy tale nonsense.
>>18555796>he's never coming backHe already did: https://www.revelationrevolution.org/jesus-the-son-of-man-was-seen-in-the-clouds-in-a-d-66/
Where to begin? Spartan women married later, had children later, and men could have more children with concubines to avoid arguments with their wives. Women were even freed from the most basic domestic tasks, could participate in sporting activities, and were celebrated like men, in addition to having certain political rights and property.
>>18554255What book is this
>t. Michel Fourmont
>>18554385I do. None of you do because you are all liberals.
>>18554399>warrior society where old white men rule is very leftist because they didn't have bunch of fst merchants exchanging coins!
>>18555844No
