Appalling Twistianty Twenty~Six 11 August 2025https://youtube.com/live/1jhC4etKlZ4
>>17915005Hail Satan
The first mass-producable helicopter was invented in 1942. If they had existed for the entire duration of the war from 1939-on, would that have meaningfully impacted the course of WWII?
>>17914620this, it like a lot of people think anyone born 30+ years before them were fucking retarded or somethingeveryone has lived in their "modern age"
>>17914610>a never before seen flying machinethis already happened during WW2 you retard with Jet Fighter airplanes.
mogged.
>>17914610How do you think these incredibly primitive, basically prototypes, would have dealt with something like vid related? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vuS8l0u9-gBecause the Krauts built a shitload of them, and much bigger, scarier, versions of them.
No because piston engines were too weak, they needed turboshaft engines to be effective, the first was built in 1943 by the Germans, but it would not be until 1948 that they began to experiment placing them in helicopters.If they began developing helicopters and turboshaft engines 3 years earlier, they might have seen use in the last months of the war, perhaps for ferrying troops and supplies onto Pacific islands against the Japanese.
You might question why he was fine being surrounded by mystics and neopagans who hated Christianity, why none of his private statements about his supposed religion were positive or why he never attended Church for non-ceremonial purposes in his adult life. You might even point out that Hitler rejected the entire old testament, thought that Paul was a lying jew who corrupted the original Aryan teachings of Christ, and believed that Jesus wasn't even divine. But don't worry, Hitler wasn't actually opposed to Christianity, he just dislike CATHOLICISM you see! Just standard prot stuff really, not that different from american evangelicals when you think about it.
Christcucks are seriously a cancer on 4chan.
>>17913688Ok.
The hitler christianity debate is hilarious. One half of christcucks try their hardest to say he was not christian to shit on atheists like Carrier, the other half (/his/) get seriously offended if you question Hitlers christian faith.
>>17914316Yes anon, 50% of Christians clearly want Hitler as their guy.
>>17914316I'm not really that invested in this debate, I just find it hilatious how he concedes to all the points in the OP and still claims Hitler was Christian. At this point why not just claim Islam is a branch of Christianity?
the picture that ended these fucking mutts for good
>>17915040where's the picture?
wait.Why did God have to kill himself to forgive humanity?
>>17914673Jesus turned and said to Peter, “Get behind me, Satan! You are a tripping block to me."Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.But what about you?” he asked. “Who do you say I am?”
>>17914710Infinity + 1 = infinity.
Theory time. *They* probably read stories about the changing of mythological eras and they made it TOO real in their own heads, and perhaps took offense that when the Taurus age ended they thought that their Bull god had literally been killed!So then they waited until they could kill the Aries that killed the Bull, and did it this way to spite their imaginary enemy that killed their supposed Bull and made people revere the dead lamb all tortured and bloodied up while nailed to a cross.Just schizo things. Always taking things too far, especially their cruelty, when they need not to.
>>17910276Amaterasu is really Venus, NOT the Sun. Its why her name does not share any with the actual Sun nor year (unlike Tsukuyomi with tsuki/month).Her red colors are a reference to the dawn, and her hiding in the cave references when the planet disappears from the sky for a while throughout the year.
>>17914718That makes no sense.
>I am haunted by the human chimpanzees I saw along that hundred miles of horrible country [Ireland]... [for] to see white chimpanzees is dreadful; if they were black, one would not see it so much, but their skins, except where tanned by exposure, are as white as ours.What did he mean by this?
>>17914694He was hating on poor Irish peasants, probably during the Irish potato famine and many went hungry and were not looking their best
>>17914694He was an Englishman and they were hating on the Irish pretty bad during his lifetimehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Kingsley
You owe us all an explanation for this.
>>17915037at least wait for the last thread that explained this to tap out first before making yet another post about it
>>17915051Kill yourself and be with your god you pathetic weakling
I didn't get this from a YouTube video, nor is it a creepypasta. I discovered it one night while searching for information on MK-Ultra… and ended up finding something much worse.It's called Project ARTICHOKE.And if you've never heard of it, it's not your fault. The CIA did its best to bury it.It all started in 1951, during the Cold War.The paranoia about "communist spies" was so strong that the CIA began researching how to break the human mind. They wanted to know if they could create a programmed assassin, someone who would kill unknowingly, without remembering anything afterward.Like "The Fear Candidate," but real.They used hallucinogenic drugs like LSD, mescaline, and scopolamine, combined with deep hypnosis. Sometimes even sleep deprivation, psychological torture, or physical trauma. The sick thing is that they didn't ask permission. Not even from their own agents.Prisoners, mentally ill people, immigrants… they all served.They were experimental fodder.A leaked file said this, verbatim:“Can we control an individual to the point where they would perform an extreme action against their will, even murder?”Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>17913601>mind control
Why is this kind of work always coming out of the USA? What is wrong with them?
Is it possible that Empereur Bokassa was doing the best he could given the limited resources of his young nation, and that his critics were actually French/CIA-backed color revolutionists? It's not like the Central African Republic is doing much better now (or at any other time) than it was doing under Jean-Bédel.
>>17913523Well he never ate schoolchildren, thats a stupid lie
Do we even know he was a cannibal or was that all "babies on bayonets" nonsense? He spent 1/3rd of his country's GDP in a frontloaded way for a spectacle once, but what about America spending all that dough on military year after year?
>>17913523>doing the best he could given the limited resources of his young nationI don't think spending the majority (or whatever it was) of your country's revenue on a coronation is doing the best with limited resources
>>17914994You neglect the aesthetics upon which movements and nations are built. Think of Washington, D.C., and what comes to mind is the buildings. A dynasty to rule for a while needs a good frontloaded beginning, especially if that dynasty claims to inherit the splendor of Napoleon.
>>17915002Plenty of other African dictators managed without, some for much longer. He also managed for 10 years before the coronation
Were they retarded? I actually can't comprehend anyone being dumb enough to believe in communism in any time period.
>>17914910>noooo don't blame the richfags in charge, blame the niggers and minorities with no financial powerGet a new line, richfag.
>>17914987NTA, but he's not wrong. Nobody, rich or poor, is going to commit resources, time and effort to improving something that doesn't belong to their tribe or their own children. The lower classes have checked out for the same reason the higher classes have - the people who surround us are not like ourselves, so there's no good reason to bother with investment or maintenance or effort in our local communities. They're not ours. Why would we?That's not even an issue of direct ownership, its simply that our monkey brains are hard-wired NOT to co-exist with people who are not like ourselves. We're not capable of it without it atomizing all upward mobility in our society, which is why even different denominations of the same religion, or different sub-groups of the same people, cannot co-exist in the same state. Same as its always been, my fren.
>>17914987*sigh*It's not that complicated. The Jews and rich people in charge use niggers and minorities as a tool to enrich themselves by taking from the white middle class.
>>17914991>Nobody, rich or poor, is going to commit resources, time and effort to improving something that doesn't belong to their tribe or their own children.I'll gladly pay into social service for Americans of other races. Go be a Russian troon somewhere else.>>17914996>The Jews....Stopped reading. Pay your fair share like I do or get the fuck out of my country.
>>17915017>my countryMy ancestors have been here for 300 years anon, I'll stay right where I am. Yours is the mindset of pure materialism. You are the last man.
Academics have believed a lot of ridiculous, false, and ridiculously false things.Throughout the 70s, it was widely thought that other animals, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_consciousness? including dogs, were not conscious. Until 1989, veterinarians were taught to ignore animal pain entirely. People even doubted that newborn babies were conscious! https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3317037/ Behaviorism, the belief that conscious states were identical to certain kinds of behavior, was widespread—meaning that being in pain is the same thing as grimacing, crying out, and so on.Logical positivism ran rampant for quite a while in academic philosophy. The logical positivists thought that the only claims that were meaningful were those that you might empirically verify or those true by definition. This meant that claims like “murder is wrong,” “the universe is billions of years old, rather than five minutes old with fake memories,” and “logical positivism is true,” are completely meaningless. Logical positivism had quite significant ascendance for decades—now, it is rejected by every single philosopher. https://fakenous.substack.com/p/the-illogic-of-logical-positivism
>>17914943There’s also an ample historical record of people mistakenly trying to excise various bits of our ontology because they seemed spooky and unscientific. If physicalists claim dualists are analogous to Vitalists—those who believed in some irreducible special life force—then it should be noted that physicalists are like Behaviorists and logical positivists. If they’re in error, their error is likely similarI don’t think either of these arguments are super decisive. Things could turn out either way. Every instance of wrongness has a historical analogue, and every instance of rightness has an apparent historical analogue where the people behaving similarly were wrong. But at least I think this shows that there isn’t a clean inductive argument in either direction—the overall picture is quite a bit more messy.Now, I think a lot of people will take away from the discussion so far that we simply shouldn’t trust academics that much. I have a young Earth creationist friend who doesn’t believe the scientific consensus on an old Earth in part because he thinks academics often go badly wrong—or as he put it colorfully, he doesn’t really trust a consensus of people who mostly support murder of babies in the womb!But I think this takeaway is much too quick. First of all, these persistent historical errors haven’t been in distinctly scientific domains, but instead in domains that weren’t scientific but where people were trying to follow a vaguely scientific vibe. None of these give much reason to distrust, say, geologists.
>>17914947Second, while academics might be wrong, so might you! It isn’t enough to merely note that academics have thought crazy things as a reason not to defer to them. Most people have thought crazy things too. Those who reject the conclusions of academics also don’t have a sterling track record.I think there are three main things I take away from the preceding analysis about the crazy things academics believed.First, if the arguments are good enough, it might be reasonable to believe that academics are being irrational. I think that’s probably true of the procreation asymmetry, for example, which has support from lots of academics despite being undermined by many powerful arguments and having nothing remotely plausible to be said for it. Your bar for this should be high, but not infinitely high.Second, we should be a bit suspicious of non-scientific claims that are wrapped in the garb of science. This should perhaps lower our credence in moral naturalism, for instance. The track record of those who have thought that science settles various questions that don’t seem scientific—like moral questions—isn’t very good. We should, in other words, be suspicious of philosophy masquerading as science.Third, many of these historical errors have had to do with consciousness—particularly with underestimating consciousness. This should perhaps raise your credence that consciousness is more widespread than is commonly believed.The historical record is very clear; academics have believed a lot of nonsense! This is a worrying fact, though as I said, it’s not super clear what we should do after being made aware of that fact.
OP you like to hear yourself think don't you
>>17914963I'm not the author https://benthams.substack.com/p/what-in-the-world-were-they-thinking
our awareness is limited in scope by the tools we create. the morality of using tools is different than what the tool measures. they did the best with what they had.
I see Jesus and the Father being very harsh. The fact that some people will not be saved makes me sad, and it seems they are a lot. What kind of God lets its creation perish? I thought God's love and power was greater than humanity's sin. But reading the gospel of Matthew seems otherwise.I feel more saved when I don't read the bible than when I read the gospels. Its impossible to follow everything. Reading the bible makes me feel sad, despair and more hopeless for humanity and me. Its supposed to be the opposite isn't it?Either God doesn't love all of its creation or he isn't able to save everyone. I can't believe in a God that weak. I'm tired of everything being in limited ignorant humans hands instead of in God's all knowing all powerful will. I thought I was saved but it seems otherwise, nothing is set up until the day I did.I can't believe in this. You don't let your loved ones to chance, you don't get the options for failure if you love someone. A father does everything for his kid, why can't an all powerful God do the same. I suppose I'm gnashing my teeth.
>>17914897yea, the 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of all humans to exist
>>17914897You're most likely no going to be good enough either.
>>17914917If it was just one man it would of still be worth it.>>17914936That's my problem.
>>17914255>What, then, will they have to say in the judgment, or how will they answer in the last times?Lord, you are merciful and forgiving. Please do not let me feel the dread of you.
>>17914962It was just one man, Jesus Christ the righteous.
There is more material about Mary in the Quran than there is in the Bible, yet Muslims are not obsessed over Mary unlike Catholics, they do not invoke her name or even a prayer to her yet Protestants are demonized for holding a similar view to Muslims by not making Mary a goddess.
>>17914902Muslims aren't even obsessed with Jesus and he is literally divine. I wouldn't put a lot of stock into their understanding of spirituality. Except Rumi.
For Catholtics Mary not being "venerated" is more important to them than the divinity of Christ.
>>17914902>There is more material about Mary in the Quran than there is in the BibleReally?
>bro what if we like, gave half of Europe to the commies?
>>17913598You realize they were our allies? Its far harder when its not someone who has been raped in propaganda for half a decade.
>>17913810> Did America regime change France after they liberated them?Literally yes, and then again two decades later.
>>17910752>war-mongering subversives.but enough about america
>>17913598Americans are actually a pretty free thinking bunch from my experience.
>bro what if we like, gave half of Europe to the capitalists?
Why is this guy in the history books?
>>17912646Sometimes I think he's in the history just to troll people. I refuse to believe this guy actually existed in the capacity they said he did, his existence feels like a punchline and not an actual historical narrative.
>>17914853its the same shit with Aleister Crowley. And now recently South Korea with the tuna fish cult.yet atheism is bad!
>>17912646Big Dick Energy. Plus he's a thought stopping cliche that prevents people from becoming curious about imperial russian elite religious practices, which were hella interesting and odd in general.
>>17912646Why is he always portrayed as a villain in media? I don't really get it, he did nothing wrong.
>>17914953He looks evil and scary
