>Taus was a member of the FBI's counter intelligence division, while serving in Vietnam he witnessed CIA trafficking illegal drugs and reported what he saw up the chain of command.>He began to independently investigate the CIA role in the narcotics trade with the mafia and the Iran-Contra.>When he refused after allegedly being told he should turn a blind eye during his end of year report, criminal charges were brought against Taus for 8 counts of sexual misconduct with minors.>Taus would be found guilty and handed a 33 to 99 year sentence, one much harsher than the many catholic priests who were being tried around the same time (Gilbert Gauthe and James Porter both molested had over 20 counts, received 20 years but served only 10/11)>Taus said although he couldn't simply report these crimes up the chain of command as it reached all the way to senior officials who had stalled any investigations such as Oliver Revell linked to both Irangate and Iraqgate scandalsDo whistleblowers ever get pardoned?
Never pardoned because he didn't die in prison. Found dead in his cell (2019) natural causes. Autopsy report buried. CIA assets in the Bureau scrubbed his file, but a CO from Nam kept a box. Letters detailing aircraft tail numbers. Not just Contra coke. Routes through AK & Canada. Politicians' kids on manifests as couriers. The whole Ivy League network. His molestation charge? One victim later admitted an agent paid his mom to ID Taus from a yearbook. The real pattern was the locations: near whistleblower safehouses & a journalist's office. They needed him on a charge so vile no one would ever look deeper. Revell's protege is now a DHS consultant. The pardon system is run by the same people. Taus was the original Epstein intel drop.
>>18247340>>18247333Why so many elites are p*dos?
Historically speaking, what was the reason for antisemitism?
>>18247022Doesn't the Talmud say that you can rape 3 year old children and that it's OK? Is this the sophisticated Jewish thought you yids keep bragging about? Or is it the constant dissimulation which forces you to keep track of all your lies and therefore detect other bullshitters (aka every elite ever)
>>18247022Funny thing is, no one's brainwashing anyone but you...on yourselfImagine claiming to be orthodox when every single Jewish belief today is heretical
>>18247284The Talmud is not the Bible. It's meant for discussion, so you need it to throw a few curve balls here and there. We don't jump it blindly.
>>18247366uh huh
>>18247022TRVTHNVKE
>England was heaven on Earth before the ConquestYeah right, lol. Easily disprovable.Go look into the deeds of Mercian king Bofa
How can Gladiators even compete?
>>18248603The same way modern athletes compete despite guys like Messi and Mbappe
Imagine the The Cranberries song ‘Zombie’ where every word is replaced with “Filioque” and it fits the metre. Imagine it being played on repeat for seemingly forever. That, that will be what Orthodox larpers will face in Purgatory.
how did Hunter gatherer compare to Pastoralists?
pastoralists mogged them
>>18247710HGs had less reliable sources of food and had to wander more in search of it. The HG way of life is more prone to sudden food shortages so they have to pay close attention to animal migration behaviors. Pastoralists can take breaks from their herds and engage in hunting and fishing when they want.There's actually a long transitory period between pure hunting and gathering without much planning and pastoralism. HGs have built animal drives out of stone around the world. Basically you setup fencing that causes deer to run in a certain direction to a designated killing zone where you ambush them. Taking control of herds like that was the first step toward pastoralism. Pastoralism is basically the endgame of hunting where you've decided to take complete control of your food source instead of leaving anything up to chance.After the death of mega fauna like mammoths, pastoralism was the next logical step in securing food year round. In warmer climates, farming was more obvious.
>>18247724Stop yelling, it's bad netiquette
>Stop yelling, it's bad netiquette
>>18247740>There's actually a long transitory period between pure hunting and gathering without much planning and pastoralism.?Pastoralists came out of sedentary cultures whose animal husbandry ended up increasing mobility and was more productive than farming. Horses, sheep, goats, cattle were all domesticated by sedentary farmers, some of which then turned into pastoralists.The sole exception was the domestication of reindeer, which happened thousands of years later and always in areas that had close contact with people already engaging in animal husbandry.Pastoralism doesn't follow hunting/gathering, it's a consequence of farming in marginal areas.
During the reign of Lê Thánh Tông from 1460-1497 (Hồng Đức era) in Lê dynasty Vietnam, Han Chinese men on ships who were blown towards Vietnam's coast were arrested by Vietnamese coastal patrols.The Vietnamese selected the young Han Chinese men for castration to become eunuch slaves.Over 100 Han Chinese young men were known to be castrated by the Vietnamese after the Ming government found out in 1472 from some people who escaped and reported over 100 Chinese men were castrated and still in Vietnam after their ships were blown off course.The Ming government again had another report in 1499 from a Chinese eunuch named Wu Rui (born in Wenchang, Hainan) who escaped in 1497 after he had been enslaved in Vietnam's palace for decades after he was castrated as a young man on a ship that blew off course.No military action was taken by the Ming dynasty against Vietnam over this.
Parce que le Vietnam c'était français fût un temps.
>>18248464Probably because they got their asses kicked by Vietnam just a few decades prior.
>>18248464Han Chinese from Hainan (Hainanese) and the Leizhou peninsula have almost no famous people before the 20th century. They only had three semi-known Ming officials (Wang Maode, Han Jun, Lin Hua) and one Qing official, Huang Jifei.Wu Rui is probably the most famous historical Han Chinese Hainanese, solely for being a eunuch slave to Vietnamese.
The King James Bible is the lens through which we need to understand history. By all means, read Thucydides, Levy, Machiavelli etc. But you need to use the King James as the lens from which to interpret all of those texts.
>>18248589>At this time, Solomon had already reigned 4 years.He was in his 4th year, so he had reigned 3 full years and change (the 4th year was not completed yet).Fortunately, regnal years are counted precisely, since the "first year" of a person's reign begins at the first new year of the king's reign, resulting in much more exact counts moving forward as each "regnal year" is a unit that can only be assigned to one king and won't be shared (barring exceptions of reigns shorter than a year).Solomon reigns the remainder of his 4th year, then reigns exactly 36 more years, which are assigned to him after that. In that 41st year (which was never completed) he died, meaning exactly 40 regnal years are assigned to him.Thus, the first regnal year after Solomon died begins 36 years and some number of months and days later. We can simply add 37 years and subtract the 1 month and 1 day to get to day 1 of month 1.Minimum: 3283 years, plus 27 daysMaximum: 3306 years, minus 25 daysThe rest is pretty simple math, backed up by the prophecy in Ezekiel 4:5 which states that the time Jeroboam in the northern kingdom set up the golden calves until the destruction of Jerusalem was 390 years. This is because Ezekiel had to lay on one side for 390 days (which is more than a year in itself and creates some possible ambiguity).Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18248591>Jehoram (8)Jehoram of the southern kingdom is an exception to the pattern. His official co-reign began 4 years before his sole reign. This may be because of his father's poor health in the last four years. Compare to 2 Kings 8:16 to 2 Kings 9:29 (see chart) and note that Jehoshaphat is given 25 years, meaning this overlap is necessary. Note that Jehoram is the only king like this, so for our timeline Jehoram is only assigned 4 years of sole reign in regnal years, instead of 8. Other rulers do have co-reigns that are mentioned as well (sometimes they are the designated heir rather than actual co-ruler; Jehoram was this also, see 2 Kings 1:17 which is 3 years prior to 2 Kings 8:16), but those do not affect this timeline.>Ahaziah (1) + Athaliah (7)One other necessary change is that Ahaziah and Athaliah do not occupy 8 full years. Rather, Athaliah was killed "in the 7th year" (see 2 Chronicles 23:1) meaning these two put together occupy 7 regnal years, not 8.Thus we have:Rehoboam (17) + Abijah (3) + Asa (41) + Jehoshaphat (25) + Jehoram (4) + Ahaziah (1) + Athaliah (6) + Joash (40) + Amaziah (29) + Uzziah (52) + Jotham (16) + Ahaz (16) + Hezekiah (29) + Manasseh (55) + Amon (2) + Josiah (31) + Jehoahaz (3 months) + Jehoiakim (11) + Jehoiachin (3 months) + Zedekiah (11) = 389 years.All that is left here is to account for the 3-month reigns, since by regnal year logic they can occupy either 0 or 1 regnal years, depending on if they span over a New Year in the calendar or not.
>>18248593Fortunately, we can solve this by simply moving our historical "fixing point" further back in time before 586 BC, which is when the temple was destroyed at the end of Zedekiah's reign (and exactly 70 years before the second temple was fully completed in 516 BC during Darius' reign, see Ezra 6:15).Jehoiachin was taken captive in the eighth year of Nebuchadnezzar according to 2 Kings 24:12. Logically then, exactly 7 years prior to this would have been during his first year. We know that Nebuchadnezzar's father died in August of 605, shortly after the Babylonians won the battle of Carchemish under Nebuchadnezzar's generalship. His first year would begin in 605 or 604 BC, depending on if you are counting New Year for Babylonian regnal years from the month Nisan or Tishri. Recall that the "first month" (Nisan or Abib) for the Israelites was changed in Exodus, as for most Mesopotamians Abib or Nisan was actually the seventh month (and the Israelites' seventh month would then be the original first month).In any case, Nebuchadnezzar's first year was in 605/604 BC, which means his eighth year began seven years later in either 598 or 597 BC, and this is when Jehoiachin was taken prisoner.We know more than this, though. Jehoiachin actually reigned for exactly 3 months and 10 days according to 2 Chronicles 36:9. And according to 2 Chronicles 36:10 and Ezekiel 40:1, Nebuchadnezzar "waited until the year was expired" before taking Jehoiachin captive. This means Jehoiachin occupies (1) year in the timeline, we can date this one regnal year as being the year that started in 597 BC, specifically in March/April, around the time of the Passover. That means Jehoiakim died 3 months and 10 days earlier than the date mentioned in Ezekiel 40:1 (10th day of 1st month), i.e. sometime in December 598 BC.
>>18248595So, counting from Jehoiakim on back, we get:Rehoboam (17) + Abijah (3) + Asa (41) + Jehoshaphat (25) + Jehoram (4) + Ahaziah (1) + Athaliah (6) + Joash (40) + Amaziah (29) + Uzziah (52) + Jotham (16) + Ahaz (16) + Hezekiah (29) + Manasseh (55) + Amon (2) + Josiah (31) + Jehoahaz (0 or 1) + Jehoiakim (11) = 378 or 379 years.If Jehoiakim's 11th year began in 598 BC, his 1st year must begin in 608 BC.This also corresponds with Daniel 1:1, which implies that Daniel was taken captive in Jehoiakim's third year. This would have to be 606 BC, which is exactly 70 years before Cyrus' reign in 536 BC. This is another 70 year period referred to as the "70 years of captivity." This time period starts about 20 years before Solomon's temple was destroyed at the end of Zedekiah's rule (586 - 516 BC). It is different than the "years of the captivity" referred to by Ezekiel however, as he counts from Jehoiachin's surrender nine years later in 597 BC instead of 606 BC.
>>18248597Therefore, using the above list Rehoboam's reign started back in 975 BC (or 976, if Jehoahaz occupies 1 year instead of 0). Solomon's 40th year started the year before that, and his 4th year started in 1012 BC, so the temple construction began in April/May of 1012 BC, with an apparent uncertainty of one year, due to different possible rules for counting regnal years coming into play.The beginning of that year would have been the previous month in March/April of 1012. Then we simply subtract that 1 month and 1 day from the earlier tally for Solomon's temple construction project.Minimum: 3246 years, plus 27 daysMaximum: 3269 years, minus 25 daysTherefore, if you now round the remaining days up to one month in either direction, the year of Adam's creation using the received text would have to be "at least" February/March of 4258 BC and cannot possibly be later than that. But the timeframe could be as early as April/May 4281 BC using this logic. The truth likely is somewhere between these extremes. Hopefully all of that makes sense. (9/9)
>vikings>normans>anglosdid these people have a submission kink?
>>18247965>To say Dublin is a viking city is retarded considering nothing is left of themThat's a pretty retarded way of looking at things. Of course wooden structures didnt survive. The Vikings conquered the area and founded dublin and became the richest group in ireland by establishing and controlling trade routes. Control of Dublin was what politics revolved around in ireland for over 200 years.
>>18247976That's still almost one half of the island. Also since you keep posting 50 year intervals keep going
>>18247990Theres not many maps. This is the only other I could find and it just represents the Irish alliance in the 9 years War against Elizabethan England.
>>18247917Says the one coping for not being celtic.England's least anglo saxon regions are still ten times more anglo saxon than ireland is celtic
>>18247777There is plenty of Continental Celtic/Proto-Celtic Admixture in Britain, a wave of Knoviz-like Admixture, you can model IA Brits as Knoviz + British MBA.The model i am showing is a bit on the heavier side of Proto-Celtic Admixture in Britain because it is England IA, but Ireland IA should be around a quarter Celtic.
Genuinely, how is it possible to be a "Sedevacantist" or some other Catholic who disagrees with the Pope?You're simply an Orthodox or a Protestant
Why do sub sharan african also understand the whip?
>>18248546They were the first to feel the lash
I ordered pic related in a frame to hang on my wall because I liked it. Please post any other images you'd hang on your wall unironically.
Any Aztec paintings done by Scott and Stuart Gentling
I ONLY HANG ORIGINAL ART ON MY WALLS, NOT PRINTS, NOR REPRODUCTIONS, WHICH WOULD BE SOMETHING VERY KITSCHY TO DO.
>>18248362
A brutal public suicide and a guilt trip don't fix our problems.
>>18244659Enjoy Hell.
>>18247952>Enjoy HellHell? Hel is the Germanic underworld. Oh, you meant Ge Hinnom! Right? The place where your idol demanded the sacrifice of firstborn children?
>>18247958Enjoy the park, or nature trail, or whatever this actually is these days.
>>18247952>i get to live foreversounds good to me.
>>18248082Damn,gehennom looks like shit!! No wonder they called it hell...
Isn't it ironic? Mediterraneans accuse us of being matriarchal, based on scarce and distorted evidence from Tacitus and genetic pages on Wikipedia, but it turns out that what was most matriarchal, i.e., a society dominated by chubby roasts, was in fac, present among the inhabitants of the Iberian Peninsula.>These discoveries challenge long-standing notions about leadership and gender among the earliest complex societies of prehistoric Europe, the article states. And it adds: In the early third millennium, the women of Valencina were powerful political and religious agents to a degree not reached by men.>Women played a central role as political and religious leaders within the social formation that lived in or frequented Valencina, the researchers conclude.https://www.labrujulaverde.com/en/2025/12/this-was-the-women-led-society-that-lasted-a-thousand-years-where-foreigners-could-prosper-and-attain-high-social-standing-in-iberian-copper-age-society/Its over... witch worshippers
Women dominating and beating you doesn't sound tok bad as long they don't cuck you .
>>18247854Funnily Marian idolatry was born in Spain according to Church scholars and tradition and from there spreaded to Languedoc, Sardinia and the Two Sicilies.
>>18248528Catholic venerate Our Lady, not worship her, the worship is exclusive to God.
>>18248539And what is the functional difference between "veneration" and "worship"?
>>18247854Southern european women are quite nationalist and are the main heads of kicking out african, pajeet, nordic/germanic and letrinoex foreigners. Basically they play a role at defending their own communities. And that's based.Northern european nationalist groups are men-only movements in comparassion because their women since ancient times fuck the winner.For puttibg an example. Strabo said that Cantabrian and Lusitanian women preferred to ^*#€ their offspring and kill themselves before getting turned into slaves or sex objects for Romans.Germanic women according to Tacitus went to the battlefield to remind their men that they would offer themselves to the enemy army if they lose.I kinda prefer the first type of women.
>ADam and EVe>ADolf and EVaHow the fuck did no one notice this before?
>>18248533Holy shi
>>18248533AD/AM = Alpha/Omega M (male)EV/E = Epsilon/V E (female)AD/OLF = Alpha/Omega LF (lost father)EV/A = Epsilon/V A (fallen mother)
