why isn’t there a secular humanist tendency that opposes abortion? you’d figure there would be at this point. instead anti abortion stufff is mired in Christ cuckery
>>18698956So why frame it in a way that makes *oppositon* to abortion be the "amerifat culture war" thing? Norway forbids elective abortions after 18 weeks, they'd be labeled far-right in the US.
>>18698965>why frame it in a way that makes *oppositon* to abortion be the "amerifat culture war" thingbecause OP was asking why opposition to abortion primarily seems to come from christiansexcessive "pro-choice" positions are similarly retarded american culture war nonsense, but that's not what this thread is about
>>18698563I'm still wondering what anon meant by this
>>18692213Because all the legitimate solutions are either all stuff that many on the pro and anti abortion side would not really like, or putting extra funding and state in healthcare and reproductive education which faces push back and budget cuts for stupid as fuck reasons.
>>18698965The thing is travel in Europe is pretty cheap and a Norwegian woman traveling to the NL for a an abortion post 18 weeks but pre 24 weeks is legal. Same for the US but certain states have this fixation on middle and lower class women traveling state lines for abortions even though the upper mid and rich ones fly for it whoch has a paper trail lol.
Uh oh...
>>18699936look man, I'm sorry but you will never be a real girl because you were born with a dick, and that is exactly the same logic which applies to dispensationalists because they reject the new covenant
>>18699948I can overhead press your deadlift for reps.
>>18699951your lack of a prefrontal cortex is showing
>>18699973Losing debates is difficult, but at least this thrashing was anonymous, learn and grow from this experience.
>>18699984>I won a debate
Realistically, how long could Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan have survived with these borders without further expansion?
>>18698841from the eugenics point of view, hitler was an absolute diaster for germans, millions of their best young males got slaughtered or died in gulags for insane unrealistic goals
>>18698479get the fuck out with this welfare commie bullshit
>>18698841>"I like the idea of an ethnostate that's pro-natalist and pro-eugenics but obviously the aggressive wars of expansion and all the camps were a bad thing,"Post War Germans said this all the time and it was heavily censored, the majority opinion in Germany from 1945-1975 was National Socialism was the best system they ever had but it had been poorly and recklessly implemented.>>18698978as was the war for Britain, the US, USSR, and Japan, from a eugenics point of view NO industrial wars are ever beneficial because the killing is random and tends to stochastically and disproportionately target intelligent young men, on both sides Pilots had insanely high casualty rates, the better the pilot the less chance theyd survive on both sides.Pilots represent the elite of the elite, being high performance young men, whether its RAF escorts of American bombardiers, Luftwaffe aces, Japanese carrier escorts, Soviet interception airmen, everyone lost their elite pilots at a huge rate.What WWI did to Aristocrats (you can be an aristocrat genetically despite holding no titles or recognition) with the mass assault officers go first, WWII did to the upper elite of every social strata from working class genetic lottery winners to high quality well bred upper middle class low level nobility.
>>18698604>utopian paradisewhy the strawman, these threads are mainly correcting the laughably juvenile narrative that Germany was the rebirth of the ancient Goths with an economy based solely on looting gold and weapons from other countries like Theoderic and the renegade Foederati.
>>18699318>Post War Germans said this all the time and it was heavily censored, the majority opinion in Germany from 1945-1975 was National Socialism was the best system they ever had but it had been poorly and recklessly implemented.I meant people alive and advocating for it today, like 4chan users. I just think it's sad and tiresome that I've never come across someone with these beliefs that seem, well, sane and likeable. It's all just "14/88 race war now, gas the niggers and kikes" and endless vitriolic hate. It would be nice to come across a national socialist or someone vaguely interested in the merits of eugenics that also comes across as a well-adjusted individual.
In Myers v. United States (1926) the Supreme Court ruled that the president had nearly unlimited authority to fire executive branch officials and Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution limits Congress from restricting this power. It was the first time the Court overturned a Federal law for violating separation of powers. The Court had recognized presidential power to remove Federal officials in several cases beginning with Ex parte Hennen (1839). In Parsons v. United States (1897), the Court ruled that this power was implicit short of a statute expressly restricting it. However, the question of whether or not the Senate's consent for removals was required remained unresolved.
An 1876 statute allowed the president to appoint and dismiss postmasters with the Senate's consent. The Myers case began in 1920 when President Wilson sacked Frank Myers, the first-class postmaster of Portland, Oregon, without consulting the Senate or offering any explanation for Myers's removal. He filed suit on grounds of lost wages, but a claims court rejected the suit on laches grounds. Myers died shortly afterward, but his widow continued the litigation.The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that presidential power to fire Federal officials was essentially unlimited. It was one of the lengthiest set of opinions in a Supreme Court ruling to date. Chief Justice Taft wrote the majority opinion. He noted that the Constitution has nothing to say about removal of Federal officials and that it was hardly brought up at all during the Constitutional Convention. Taft found that the Virginia Plan had offered to grant the president all of Congress's executive powers. Some of the delegates distrusted the idea of a unitary executive and lobbied for the Appointments Clause in which the Senate's permission was required.
Although the Senate must consent to appointments and Congress had the authority to create executive offices, the president nonetheless did have the authority to dismiss Federal officials freely as part of his vested powers. The amicus curiae brief for the case was written by a 23 year old Claude Pepper, future member of the House and Senate and one of its most outspoken liberals, which suggested that allowing unlimited presidential authority to sack Federal officials would resurrect the spoils system. Taft gave little weight to this argument, arguing that the president's removal power caused no interference with the merit system because the Senate had the authority to approve Federal appointments, ensuring they would be appointed by merit.Taft's opinion then went down subsequent Congressional debates over the issue. He said that Montesquieu was the main originator of the separation of powers doctrine and believed the Constitution kept the three branches of government separated in most circumstances and cited historical evidence that Alexander Hamilton and the Neutrality Proclamation proved Article 1, Section 2 does not restrict presidential power. Congress had debated for an entire month in 1789, the so-called "Decision of 1789", and came to the conclusion that the president had full authority to remove Federal officials.
Justice McReynolds was one of the three dissenters in the case. He went down a list of quotes from members of the Constitutional Convention and said the Constitution had no text in it, nor did the notes at the Convention suggest the president was supposed to have unlimited authority to fire Federal officials on any whim of his. McReynolds argued that this unlimited removal power had degraded the civil service and caused demands for reform. He noted that Daniel Webster, Henry Clay, and John Calhoun had all condemned the "evils" that would result from the president being able to arbitrarily fire officials.Justice Brandeis in a separate dissent wrote that Marbury v. Madison had as its basis the assumption that the president cannot fire a Federal official without the Senate's consent and that the issue was long considered settled after that case.Justice Holmes noted that Congress could abolish the position of postmaster entirely in addition to setting its pay and duties, and so they should also be able to set terms of the position's occupiers.Humphrey's Executor v. United States (1935) saw the Court limit the president's authority to strictly executive branch offices. In Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2020) the Court upheld the Myers ruling and determined that the president's power to sack Federal officials is essentially unlimited.
>>18699611>The Myers case began in 1920 when President Wilson sacked Frank Myers, the first-class postmaster of Portland, Oregon, without consulting the Senate or offering any explanation for Myers's removal.Wilson was a dying cripple by this time so any actions his final year in office are suspect.
Germany didn't deserve the Versailles Treaty, the original culprits of the Great War were in the Balkans. Serbia alone was responsible for Europe's destruction and America's rise!
DGB of a thread.
>Be me>General Westmoreland>Fight Commies>Lose>Westlessland
>>18699832>strategy is "just kill lots of people lol">is surprised when he can't achieve a strategic victory>gets canned after Tet
Croatia took the meme too far
>>18699747It was never a meme. Balkaners are just that unhinged naturally and that was the entire joke.
>>18699801Though you could argue this has to do with the Balkans (where that ends is up to you being socio-culturally part of the middle east more than anything else.
>>18699747America has a bigger claim to Tesla than either Croatia or Serbia
>"My Duce, my heart is a bruised fruit that only your hands can touch. If you do not answer this letter, the silence will murder me just as surely as a bullet. I am yours, body and soul, even if you never look upon my face.">"I know they surround you, actresses, countesses, women who only want a piece of your glory. But they do not love the man; they love the power. Only I love Benito the man! If you give them your smile today, I swear the angels in heaven will weep for my broken heart.">"My husband is entirely useless, both as a Fascist and a provider, and refuses to fix our roof. Duce, you who fix the entire nation and conquer empires, surely you can send a word to command him to respect me—or better yet, come to the window yourself so I may look upon my true master.">Every morning I salute your photograph before I salute the flag. My mother says I am too young to understand love, but she does not know that you whispered to me through the radio last night. I am saving myself entirely for Italy and for you."
>>18697246>Il Duce was a chad extrovert who fucked other people's wives >Hitler was a weird autistic pedo who wanted to fuck his niece and groomed Eva BraunKek
>>18698731+++This is a public service announcement aimed at incels+++>Grooming is something done to pre-pubescent children.>When the topic is young women who can breed, it's called courting.+++Thank you for your attention to this matter.+++
>>18697246Pazzo!
>>18698731>>18698858both cringe posts
>>18697246Average Italian
did spider-man actually exist as a historical person, or did the spider-man tradition originate as a symbolic/mythological story?the evidence points toward a real peter parker. the earliest traditions consistently place spider-man in queens, associate him with a radioactive spider bite, and describe him as a photographer who operated in new york. we know the people who personally knew peter like gwen stacy, harry osborn, and his own aunt may. j. jonah jameson’s repeated descriptions of spider-man as a menace preserve an alternative perspective which is evidence of a historical figure being remembered differently by different witnesses>a real peter parker best explains the consistent biographical tradition>multiple sources preserve the same basic story: peter parker, queens, the spider bite, uncle ben, photography, and spider-man’s activities in new york>mary jane, eddie brock, johnny storm, etc. are treated as independent contemporary witnesses within the tradition>the tradition contains mundane biographical details that would be unnecessary if spider-man were purely mythical>peter is explicitly portrayed as a human being with a birth, family, childhood, and physical existence>the spider-man stories contain apparent historical memories that were subsequently embellished and mythologizedComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18698774>>18698778>>18698781>rejecting spiderman despite the mountains of evidence like the existence of the entire city of new york and hundreds of eyewitnesses of himyou still have time to let go of your pride in the face of evidence.
>>18698798Stan Lee only. Anything else is false and an attempt to discredit His Truth.
>>18698912Stan Lee recounts meeting Jack Kirby in New York. There he publicly rebuked Kirby and other “super pencillers” stating >Even Steve Ditko was led astray by their hypocrisyStan Lee’s meetings with Jack Kirby and Steve Ditko provide evidence that early adherents of the Spider-Man character were real people who personally claimed association with Spider-Man, supporting Peter Parker’s historical existence
>>18698912>>18699731Steve Ditko drew and designed spidey but Stan took all the credit
>>18699740jokes aside stan lee didnt like what jack kirby was doing with the character and handed it off to ditko
>>18699769They practice something called spiralism already. They use humans to cut and paste stuff to each other.
What if Hitler killed himself because he lost an iPod?
>>18699082HWNBAW
What if only 5,999,999 Jews died in the holocaust, would that still be illegal to say in Europe even if hard evidence confirmed it lol.
>>18699336It's not actually illegal to doubt the exact number of deaths in the Holocaust. They usually say it was 6 million Jews, but it could've been plus or a minus a million. Many of the sickly, weak Jews just got shot or died without reaching the camps alive, so they obviously wouldn't record all their names upon entering a concentration camp. Any Jews who died during pogroms like the Kristallnacht, who were killed in Germany by angry mobs or by isolated individuals with murderous intent, or who died in events like the Warsaw uprising are also counted as part of the Holocaust's total death toll.
>>18699079Somewhat related but remember when that Bolivian dictator sent the cia a Photoshopped image of him and Hitler hanging out
>>18699082He did kill himself but somebody moved the body after the fire didn't take.
https://youtu.be/UcgAXE_X4IwWell incel image board users? Was he an incel?
>>18699728It wasn't involuntary, so no. Please learn what a word means before using it.
>materializing ash from his hands>materializing rings, necklaces, watches, statues and coins>materializing photographs or religious images>producing sacred objects from empty hands, including Shiva lingams>bilocation>teleportation>clairvoyance>precognition>healing illnesses through touch, blessings, prayer or vibhuti>healing people remotely>raising the dead>changing the weather, particularly producing rain>walking on water>levitation>stopping or controlling bleeding through blessingsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18697704Bumping the Indian Padre Pio.
>>18697704Why is his skin colour like shit? Why doesn’t he change it?
>>18697704Trvke. Brainlet atheists can't fathom miracles. They whine about le soience when there's miracles happening everyday
>>18699032If your poop looks like that you should see a doctor
jeet scam artist
>Rome and RennaisanceHow come they're only ever able to be relevant as long as they have greeks to steal and copy everything from?
at least they did something with it, greasers just sat on their knowledge for thousands of years
>>18698666You're overstating the impact of fleeing Greeks on Renaissance Italy.But you know who else had access to Greek stuff? Greeks. And yet Italians accomplished much more.
>>18698666the greeks are creatorsthe italians are appliersit's like peanut butter and chocolategreat when separate, but when they combine they make the morning time epic
>>18698666Same people
>>18699687South Italians should be the darker ones thoughbeit.
Guys, is it okay what I find Austrian Chancelor Schuschnigg very handsome?
>>18696822nigga u gay
Obligatory reminder that Mussolini deserved what happened to him for betraying Dollfuß
>>18697140Imagine having a former Austrian dictator as your history professor. Reality truly is more absurd than fiction.
>>18697739my classmate looked like this>t.slav
>>18696822Shush nig
