Like that scrolls of papyrus/parchment can still be out there preserved under the right conditions buried somewhere waiting to be discovered? Or what we have is what we will ever have from ancient Greece/Rome?
If God created Hell and is ready to send his children there for eternity for disobeying him, then God is evil. It's really that simple. No matter who you are or what your transgression is, no one deserves infinite torture until the end of time. But here's God ready and willing to dish out this fate to MOST PEOPLE
>>17439824So you admit it's a thought thus an illusion?
>>17439830What is an illusion?
>>17439839Pearls before swine and all that. >inb4 seething and gnashing
>>17439843Thst's why you can't hear his voice. You see him as an enemy.Good luck.
>>17438127> apokatastasisNot the teaching of any major denomination or church.
>So Baal's prophets shouted louder. They cut themselves with swords and knives, as their customs taught them to do. Soon, there was blood all over themshias explain yourselves
Never trust a religion that says youre a worthless bitch that should suffer. It creates bitchmade slavefolk.
>>17438693this is also why eastern catholics are the best catholics. the latin-rite is basically nu-protestantism.
>>17438630Iranians banned tatbir btw, It's still practiced in Afghanistan or Bangladesh.
>>17438693that is a very saarish post
>>17440066>>17439017abrahamic religions at their core are about how no fun is allowed. the ones that lean away from this is because they're influenced by the pagan past
The decline of religion is inevitable as our knowledge of how the universe works progresses beyond that of a bronze-age peasant. I mean, the people who wrote the bible literally say god lives in the sky.
yes he sits atop his ark of his testimony before going to the alamo /his/ says
>>17438442Alamoposter is God
>>17438442The truth is that all the godless will be wiped out and only those who love and fear God will survive. There will be no religion, people will simply worship God in their hearts and honor him by living righteously to his delight, and praise him with great joy for his great blessings and gifts that showers them with in an endless stream.God lives waaaaaaay above the sky. The heights in which the eagle flies don't even reach his feet.
>>17438442>our knowledge of how the universe worksHumans barely have any knowledge about this, as much as they think they know, they know very little.
>>17438442The Alamo or Bust!
Gothic architecture is top tier. It transports you to heaven. It feels like you're in a transcended realm.
>>17438895i’m more into ancient greek and rococo aesthetics, but gothic cathedrals were stellarromanesque was underrated too
>>17438895feels like the spirits of stupid and intolerant people left some of their darkness on Earth to stare at us menacingly.
For me, it's Byzantine architecture.
>>17439742Cool mosque
>>17439742Byzantine architecture is too simplistic.
>10,000 years ago North Africa was as lush and fertile as South America is today>Monuments like the pyramids and sphinx are practically impossible to date, being made of stone>"Ummmm no they definitely made these things in the last few thousand years, it's not possible that advanced civilisation existed 10,000+ years ago and was washed away by global flooding and later buried under mountains of sand no they definitely did nothing but live in caves for 500,000 years and only started building shit during this last 1% of human history"Uh huh...
>>17439754Why would you presume that global flooding wiped this civilization out and not just broad desertification? Isn't it a lot easier to suppose that something similar to what happened to the Ancestral Pueblo occurred with drier conditions resulting in gradual social collapse as opposed to a global flood? Why even assume a global flood here?
>>17439759>Why would you presume that global flooding wiped this civilization outBecause there's mounting evidence for global floods about 12,500 years ago, and the Sahara began turning into a desert 10,000 years ago. I'm not saying it was a one two punch that happened overnight, but these two major events would certainly have wiped out any civilisation there at the time and wiped them out so hard and so thoroughly that nothing but things like the pyramids would survive. The sphinx had to be dug out of the sand after all, who knows what else is buried under all those layers.
Too bad most cuntspiracy theorists are probably too worldly hold themselves to any meaningful spiritual devotion like the enlightened civilizations they claim to believe in supposedly would.
Why did the soviet union have such strong ties with Africa? Any russophobic comments about how russians are white africans will be removed
>>17439709?
>>17439783see >>17439551
>>17439551>there's a shitload of Vietnamese and Angolans in East Germanythere really isn't
>>17439928There are though. Until recently mostly the only foreigners in east germany were vietnamese and angolans in fact. Still very low in numbers, but for east germany, it's a shitload.
>>17439937very misleading wording to say the least
How Greek are modern south Frenchmen?>Marseille is often considered the oldest city in France. Continuously inhabited since 600 BC, it was founded by Anatolian Greeks as Massilia. (pictured artist's depiction of ancient Massilia). >Pytheas of Massalia was a Greek geographer, explorer and astronomer from the Greek colony of Massalia. He made a voyage of exploration to Northern Europe in about 325 BC. On this voyage, he circumnavigated and visited a considerable part of the British Isles. He was the first known Greek scientific visitor to see and describe the Arctic, polar ice, and the Celtic and Germanic tribes. He is also the first person on record to describe the midnight sun. The theoretical existence of some Northern phenomena that he described, such as a frigid zone, and temperate zones where the nights are very short in summer and the sun does not set at the summer solstice, was already known. Similarly, reports of a country of perpetual snow and darkness (the country of the Hyperboreans) had reached the Mediterranean some centuries before. Pytheas introduced the idea of distant Thule to the geographic imagination, and his account of the tides is the earliest one known that suggests the moon as their cause.
So the events of the past 100 years have literally just been because of this guy?
>>17439856>The arch hapa>has a better jaw line than any of them.The aristocracy truly is something genetic.
>>17439856
There's nothing wrong with believing in God. I just don't believe in a Jew on a stick. I'm a Deist, like George Washington was. I'm just like him.
>>17439692You are a stochastic parrot.
>>17439692This has already happened to my people thoughbeit. Still don't believe in a desert djinn. Jesus was probably a good guy and existed, but just don't think he was God
>>17439698Nice way of calling him a NPC bot.
>>17439698Running out of words to insult me with.
>>17439692>uncircumcisedSo is the fenanine word the idea of a soft heat? An opening up to the words of others?their heart is far away from Me.And in vain do they worship Me,Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men
The British, French, Spanish, and Portuguese are the Atlantid race. Those countries conquered more of the world far more than anyone else. It's not even close. I mean successful conquest that lasted. The rest of Europe pales in comparison.
>>17439206picrel is not even spanish hahaha, yes juan esteban lopez de maria jose, we already know how inferior you feel for having been conquered by the atlantean spanish
>>17439630he has the maximum Neolithic ANF Iberian phenotype, compare him with the Sardinian (right).
>>17438756Because of pic related. The Italians, Greeks, etc. were bottled up in the Mediterranean, with no way of accessing the wider world without the permission of whoever controlled access to the Atlantic.
>>17438756Superior Bell Beaker and mix of Celtic and Roman genetics, access to the Atlantic
>>17438756>have access to the Atlantic while the rest of europoors are stuck in the Mediterranean (whose only exit you control)>conquer the AtlanticWOAAAHHH fuckin master race this is clearly genetic superiority
Why does Galicia have more “North African” admixture than southern Spain even though the former was occupied the least, and the latter was occupied the most by Al Andalus?So Al Andalus is not responsible for the “North African” component in Spaniards?Ive heard about it being from the Neolithic and Roman Era, so how much is it from each era?Is it true that they are 11% North African, and 5% of that is Iberomaurusian from the Neolithic?
>>17438275nothing pulls up when i search those studies
>>17436578Unironically these posts are made by a mutt injun who thinks his kind are better than Semites and Blacks and blame Spaniards of introducing oriental and african stuff to them by stablishing Western civilization in America... when at the best his people was stuck as Mesolithic/Neolithic era grugs who behave pajeet tier in the internet...
>>17439804Funnily he has an strong obsession with post interracial stuff, pajeet tier ppl. Burgers truly dodged a bullet by putting all them in reservers, otherwise they would have pajeets 2,0 BBC posting flooding the internet
>>17439809More BBC posting, I would continue, but who cares, OP musy really have a sad life to seethe at other nation by cuck posting BBC interracial shit as some kind of non paid full time job
>>17437120he is a new world mongrel, it is not arabs making these threads
Why are matrilineal populations never found in Europe? Is it because of male supremacy ideology found innately in the Caucasian race?
>>17439451The Indo-Europeans will never be real
>>17439476
>>17437672Agriculture is main reason for the rise of patriarchy. All signs point to thisWomen's status in tribal and nomadic culture are much higher than women's status in agricultural societies
>>17439484Two more weeks and I won't descend from my paleolithic ancestors in Europe trust the plan
>>17437672Because Indoeuropeans were a strictly patriarchal warrior tribe who subdued and conquered the matriarchal megalithenvolker of Europe.
Why were the greeks obsessed with black people? In the oldest greek text the iliad, ethiopia is implicitly shown as a blissful foreign land where the gods go on vacation often. The now-lost sequel of the iliad focuses on an army of superhuman african warriors coming to help the trojans and almost destroying the entire greek army. Centuries later herodotus describes ethiopians as the tallest, healthiest and strongest people on the earth, while trashing the babylonians in the same book. Why were ancient europeans fascinated with africans?
>>17437425She has an absolutely beautiful angular face that is not african in the slightest.
>>17438798>Those whose skin is too dark are cowardly: witness Egyptians and the Ethiopians. Those whose skin is too light are equally cowardly: witness women Aristotle, equating ''ivory'' skin as being feminine (it is) >>So much for the formation of the hair; we should now pass on to the features of all the incidental features of the mixtures, as regards the differences of hair according to age, place, and nature of the body. The hair of Egyptians, Arabs, Indians, and of general all peoples who inhabit hot, dry places, has poor growth and is black, dry, curly and brittle. That of the inhabitants of cold, wet places, conversely - Illyrians, Germans, Dalmatians, Sauromatians, and the Scythian types of people in general- has reasonably good growth and is thin, straight, and red. Those who live in some well-balanced land which is between these in quality have hair with extremely good growth, which is strong, fairly black, moderately thick, and neither completely curly nor completely straight. The differences due to age are analogous to these: with regard to the qualities of strength, thickness, size, and colour, infants’ hair is similar to the Germans’, hair in the prime of life to the Ethiopians’, and that of ephebes and children to the hair of people of well-balanced lands.Galen distinguishing himself and others of his people from whites. You will NEVER be greek, eurangotan. Go worship a tree in whatever bog you crawled out from. Also Hitler blew his brains out and germans were raped by soviets, wiggy niggy.
>>17437417Ethiopians were semites back then. Bot blacks.
>>17439506"Ethiopian" to ancient Greeks meant any black people living in the lands south of Egypt.
The whole population desired BBC.Greeks were homos you know.
Massachusetts v. Laird (1970) saw the Supreme Court turn down a challenge from the state of Massachusetts that the Vietnam War was being waged unlawfully and unconstitutionally. The defendant in the case was Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird. Massachusetts passed a law stating that none of its residents could be conscripted into the Vietnam conflict on the grounds that Congress had never issued a formal declaration of war.The Court declined to hear the case in a 6-3 vote for lack of jurisdiction. Justice William O. Douglas dissented. He quoted Massachusetts v. Mellon from 47 years earlier in which the Court had ruled that a state lacked standing to constitutionally challenge a Federal aid program it charged with usurping a power belonging to the states. Douglas went on to say that although a state may act to defend its rights against unconstitutional acts by the Federal government, no such situation arose here. The Mellon case involved an act of Congress whereas here Massachusetts protested the absence of Congressional action. Mellon's companion case, Massachusetts v. Frothingham, had seen the Court rule that a taxpayer could not file suit against a Federal spending bill. The two cases had been decided by the Taft Court which was a strong advocate of substantiative due process, a doctrine the Court had since moved away from. The Court had partially overturned Frothingham in the recent Flast v. Cohen case.
>MA is a super-blue state that overwhelmingly voted for LBJ in '64>wait, you can't draft our kids into 'Nam Mr. President. fuck you.You got what you asked for, guys.
>>17437689Goldwater promised to start World War III over Vietnam, you think he'd have been any better?
>>17437634on that note IDK why they stopped doing proper declarations of war after WW2
>>17437718I wonder if it has something to do with the fact that the "enemy" keeps shapeshifting. I would wonder, for example, how Congress would be expected to declare war on every ISIS-like organization that pops up, just in order to do counter-terror ops. As much as we would like to limit war, it seems to me like limiting the commander-in-chief to this extent would only potentially hamstring the US national interest. Not to mention it might only ironically cause more war to start; when US leadership has failed to act in the past, it often meant opportunistic adversaries took that as a green light and escalated conflict. You can look at any time period since December 7, 1941.I think the declaration of war still exists as an avenue that would rarely need to be used. It would be used in order to confirm that another sovereign entity with whom the US has, until very recently, had diplomatic relations, is now subject to hostilities. It would clear up any doubts as to the legality, as far as the US is concerned, about the armed forces attacking the target of the declaration. In the case of hostile entities such as rebellions who are not even recognized as sovereign states, it seems like this wouldn't be necessary. That doesn't mean I think the President should just attack whoever, but I think there are good reasons why they should have discretion to act in the national interest since someone ultimately has to make these decisions.
>>17437620when will the US people rise up and demand Marbury v Madison is overturned. Supreme court was never intended to have this power
