>>96464867
>that arent EDH
>posted in the EDH board
>answered to an EDH related question
i will just iognore your first stance on development

File: 0C22D8E6CB8F2219B81749AA5(...).png (867 KB, 646x902)

867 KB PNG

>>96462950
Use board-wide pings to own your opponents epic style

>>96464867
>In all the formats that arent EDH
This is EDH. Not other formats. Thing that are bad in this format are good in other and vise versa. To not understand this outs you as a retard.

>>96464877
Anon, you appealed to the rest of the community you cant invoke
>edh thread
When you are the one who forced the greater magic community into the discussion (who is looking down on commander plays if not the rest of the mtg community), unaware that the greater magic community agrees with the "ramp is unnecessary" view of magic. The only decks that should ramp are the ones that play bombs and need them out on a timeline that matches normal decks.

You have been logucally dismantled do not waste aynmore of my time.

>>96464906
>>96464901
You guus invoked the greater magic community not me, do not get pissy that they are now part of the discussion.
>things that aren't good in normal games are good here!
Not really doe. Some cards definitely got a chance to shine in EDH such as rhystic which was a 25 cent card until EDH became big. But no, by and large, you want to approach the game the same. Youre welcome to state what you think changes in game philosophy.

>>96464757
>>96464765
Ah, classic. First it exists, then it doesn’t, and now suddenly I’m the one who imagined the whole thing? You hinted at secret Telegram drops, claimed people were printing, and when asked for proof, you bailed. Folded like resin in a hot car. At least I could 3D print that.

>>96464788
>First it exists
Said who? Where?

>You hinted at secret Telegram drops
Who? Where?

How about you finally provide some proof for your claims Anon.

>>96464809
Lmao, you’re really gonna gaslight now? You literally said people are printing and it’s just custom models, right after dodging requests for files. Now you’re pretending none of that happened?

Nice try. The burden of proof was on you the second you claimed it existed. I just asked for evidence. You couldn’t deliver. End of story.

>>96464855
Then thats the end of it. It does not exist.

File: anon.jpg (26 KB, 432x179)

26 KB JPG

>>96464855
Protipp: hide your phone number

File: Spoiler Image (336 KB, 849x1200)

336 KB JPG

>>96463926
those fuckers right here

>>96463935
That's a gnome tho

>>96463970
says elves right on the cover, those are obviously elves

I wonder what clientele browses this website, that isn't able to comprehend words having different meanings depending on the context.

>>96464000
Gnomish trickery. You must have failed your perception check. Many such cases.

>>96464191
>no punctuation
Foul, sexy, but foul

File: 20250903_184327.jpg (424 KB, 1110x906)

424 KB JPG

are these shields little too much and too goofy for assault marines and dreadnoughts
be honest now

>>96464779
I think it'd work on a contempor frame but not a box naught

>>96464779
I feel like the dread one is a tad too big

>>96464779
both are too big and most importantly too thick

i also don't think a dread looks good with a shield of any kind, they are already derpy enough

>>96464482
its viral marketers. I’m not even joking. They are on all discussion forums but they stand out the most here.

>>96464482
The solution, reply all threads with nigger, make it so the marketing shill has to show the manager the metrics saying people will reply nigger nigger to every card they present
Do your work nigger

>>96464599
implying that soulless viral marketing shills have the integrity to be honest for one second about what people’s feedback actually is

>>96464599
My king, your crown.

>>96464556
4chan is truly 80% bot/bad actors these days...

>>96462433
It has been a while but odds are you can copy and paste Silent Hill as a Gheist plotline.

>>96464369
They gave some hints as to why that happened
>the Capuchin manipulated everyone
>the agreement of 1528 was set to expire in a few years.
They could have made it less ridiculous if they’d just spelled it out a little more clearly.

Do people think merits in old world of darkness is overpowered or maybe over rated?

>>96464665
Most merits are overpriced or niche. Every now and then you get some outliers like Enchanting Voice that feel like must picks for a type of character.

>>96464665
Merits are like most thing in WoD ruleset - extremely poorly balanced. Most are garbage, some are useful, and rare few like Lucky or Eidetic Memory are absolutely busted.

>>96456869
>69
>deviant elves
nice

>>96456869
Rolling

File: sample_dbab4aa4eba487f4a6(...).jpg (556 KB, 850x1149)

556 KB JPG

Rolling.

>>96463135
>infertile subarctic necromancers
Would be decent villain faction.

>>96456869
let's see how this works

>>96464698
Was she a survivor or the one who destroyed the village? Both situations seem fucked up.

>>96464667
The Exalted have the spirit courts in their pockets, sadly.

>>96464715
>Was she a survivor or the one who destroyed the village?
A survivor.

>Both situations seem fucked up.
I can see how that would be the case if she’d destroyed the village, but what about her being a survivor?

>>96464505
And which canon or premade OC character is that?

>>96464698
You too, that's neither canon nor premade OC. You can tell by the lack of specific description of what they look like, what their personality is like or even name.

>>96463632
I would suggest drawing some shapes on paper and cutting those out, and just label it as [terrain piece] in the interim. Yeah it's not pretty, but mechanically it works.

File: file.png (160 KB, 512x286)

160 KB PNG

>>96463632
4th was designed to be played with thought-out tables that look like battlefields in the 41st Millennium instead of the tabletop equivalent of TF2 Orange maps.

>>96458347
I think in addition to the actual problems with the core rules, dislike for 5th gets - justifiably IMO - amplified in groggy circles because it's also the edition that began GW's modern embrace of named characters. They had tried mostly dropping the "opponent's permission" prohibition on specials already, but the community largely continued to enforce it themselves, and 5th was GW saying
>Oh you won't get on board of your own accord? Fine you ungrateful fucks, now all your subfactions fun flavour rules are tied to a specific dude, howdya like dem apples piggies?

>>96463665
>>96463763
Yep we knew modern terrain rules where ass, but this level suck assery was not expected. The few times we played at my place I live rather far away so the carless folks have a hard time getting here there is very noticeable difference to how games are played. Than when we played at the local store that has the shit ass 10th terrain.
The random sandbags and bushes change a lot how the game plays

Alright, i've been struggling with stuff outside the thread for a bit so i have to drop working on the daemonhunters book.

Who wants to pick up that one and transcribe it? preferably someone who actually played them back then.

>>96464255
Forbidden lore

File: Alyona 7.jpg (63 KB, 655x1200)

63 KB JPG

>>96462921
>>96462942
Yaya would get Alyona's best side: none of the more criminal things she does happen around Yaya because she wants to preserve her good opinion of her as long as possible.

Suffice it to say she treats the student council a bit better because she has a friend there who overrides her "survival mode" need to conquer territory.

Alyona would be VERY interested in learning about real (or "real") Japanese culture. I get the feeling Yaya would be treated very protectively by Alyona. Anyone who tries to bully her is going to get reprisal.

File: Alyona 11.png (774 KB, 1100x1498)

774 KB PNG

>>96460042
Thanks!
>>96460224
Good to hear. Did I write him well?
>>96462425
Make a build and try your luck at gallantly charming her so doesn't end up in a lesbian relationship with her half-Chinese bestie.

>>96464704
Make a chart rating builds by their datability

>>96453139
For some of those, linking the rentry when it doesn't contain the pics is odd.

File: NY-wing.png (876 KB, 1230x615)

876 KB PNG

>Do you make use of combat-focused shuttles?
I'm rolling up a Captain's Log campaign and intend to have some combat shuttles in the sector. No plans to trench run anything.

>>96462110
>TQ
Generally no. Any time I think about doing it I just think how dumb it was in Discovery and how little they seemed to help the Odyssey in DS9. Far as I'm concerned, shuttles exist to be shot down to start a plot.

File: Corvette Bridge Concept 1.png (23 KB, 1056x768)

23 KB PNG

>>96462110
>Thread Question: Do you make use of combat-focused shuttles?
>>96464626
Make it a Corvette then!

>game bugs and wont let me block
>restart game
>bug is still there
Can someone fucking kill all poojeets?

>>96463850
Because in that text "Vehicles" is referring to the type, which is a proper noun, and "crews" and "stations" are used as verbs.

>>96464050
2 oxen, 5 wagon wheels, 2 axles, 50 bullets and 100 food

File: otc-25-crackling-spellslinger.jpg (105 KB, 488x680)

105 KB JPG

>>96464476
if this was true then why isn't "instant" "sorcery" or "spell" capitalized here?

File: woe-193-tough-cookie.jpg (155 KB, 672x936)

155 KB JPG

>>96464735
Because those are card types, Vehicle is a subtype. See cards like Tough Cookie, where Food gets capitalized but artifact and creature don't.

>>96463001
Not only would that be amazing, also ideal! Sadly there are no beastmen in my local scene. Would love to do a Dark Monolith mini campaign. There are a shed ton of dwarfs though, ironically.

>>96463036
Be the change you want to see, ask around about a join chaos v order campaign, and if you’re willing you can sponsor them with a beastlord or something.

>>96462976
Please do, and good luck!

>>96456160
Nah it down look very good, they look like Marvel's groot not stragly weird Ian Miller trees with faces

File: PXL_20250903_155024340~2.jpg (1.47 MB, 3713x2106)

1.47 MB JPG

>>96456135
Agreed. It's why I'm sculpting some of my own tree dudes.

>>96434718
Several questions:
1 - what one-shot (preferably 1st level) would anons advice for group who wants to try out 3.5/pf1e and only played 5e before?
2 - weird to ask in a 3.5 thread, but why not 3.5 and pathfinder 1e or just pathfinder 1e? What are pros/cons of all 3 choices?
3 - what is the ideal level range you anons prefer? Asking because I remember "E6" being a thing way way back.

>>96463451
1- No idea.
2- I imagine most people do mix both to some extent. PF isn't really a wholesale improvement to 3.5e, most changes are kind of a wash as far as I can tell, so it's to taste.
I like 3.5e material more and I dislike CMB/CMD, some feats, amongst other things from PF so I like 3.5e better as a base. The best thing from PF are some base classes and the bestiaries.
3- My only experience so far has been levels 12 to 15, but I imagine anything under lvl 3 or so would be pretty limiting character option wise, which might be ideal for some types of games, but as far as my preferences, I think around lvl 10.
So maybe a 5 to 15 range.
And yes, E6 is a thing. So is E10 if I'm not wrong.

>>96463451
I think E6 nailed it with the concept of character levels corresponding to the tone of the campaign, where very low levels are gritty realism and 6-10 fall into heroic fantasy. I don't personally like super hero games and thus don't enjoy PCs beyond level 6-8

>>96457081
3.5 is the most simulationist that D&D has gotten, PCs and NPCs/monsters play by the same rules and I find this satisfying.

>>96464769
What? No they don't. NPCs have different limitations on them than PCs do and monsters are almost arbitrary.

>>96464523
They are basically to card games what The Simpsons are to adult animated sitcoms.

File: evilhomer.jpg (104 KB, 960x720)

104 KB JPG

>>96464549
>I am Yami Yugi, I am Yami Yugi
>I am Yami Yugi, I am Yami Yugi

>>96464549
what is the south park of card game?

>>96464523
MTG is in a weird spot where it's only being played because it's being played, not because it's good. People buy into games that they can play locally. So for any LGS, all it would take is a conscious decision to switch to a different main game by the store, but no store has a reason to do that.
But maybe that's just my opinion, and mtg already succeeded in replacing their audience with slop eaters that are there specifically for sonic and spongebob.

>>96464642
Adam Poots hasn't made a card game we can play yet but it's in the works