>>97174784
>SHE DOESN'T WAN'T TO STRIKE THEM BUT TO CONVINCE THEM
So
>And then they would tell her to fuck off. What next?

>>97174827
My bad, meant to
>>97174804
>SHE DOESN'T WAN'T TO STRIKE THEM BUT TO CONVINCE THEM
So
>And then they would tell her to fuck off. What next?

>>97174845
You try and convince people when you believe you can convince them. She clearly believes that they wont just tell her to fuck off, that she has a good enough argument to have them change their mind.

>>97174845
She would keep trying to prove to them humans don't need them? She would keep offsetting their schemes in the world woth her machines? She would try to seal them in the toybkx or somethjng similar? She would challenge them in a bet? We don't know, what we know is that while she's their opponent she respect them and doesn't want to strike them, it's just you obsessed with the idea that she would automatically try to kill them, despite that just ruinibg everything for everyone, and she actively fought their other enemies for them.

>>97174861
Or Vtorusha are just idiot.
But, I am pretty sure, canonical answer is what there is not much difference between arguing and fighting in metaworld/dream. Loser would get wrecked, as true dragons demonstrated.
It is similar to a shaping combat in exalted.
So, "arguing" was just a violent takeover.

>>97174783
Sacked, because phenix blood was the only known cure to ghoul aids and Archaon's spear bitch had Ushoran pee in her eye making her see rainbows and unicorns everywhere until she rushed in to kill the bird for Chinese medicine.
Then Lumineth literally stole the pheonix before it regenerated to "protect" it

File: 83671579_126939142188283_(...).jpg (115 KB, 1080x1080)

115 KB JPG

>>97174762
Glymmsforge

>>97174803
This rat ogre has the face of a turtle.

File: IMG_6301.jpg (1007 KB, 1073x1362)

1007 KB JPG

>>97173683
>>97173692
>>97173696
How’s that for your Flesheater Court Musket proxies? I think I got close enough to the tone .

>>97174169
> Also, unlike most GW novels named after a character, Abraxia is in this quite a bit, unlike Kragnos

That was actually my biggest concern, it’s crazy how often the books don’t feature the character they are named after

>>97174071
I got them into Space Marine and Darktide first. But my guys are fans of scifi so I got nothing for you.
Maybe try to get them into WFRP first?

>>97174071
Start out with WFRP first. Then, if the mood is right, reveal that you've been playing 40k on a feudal world the entire time. Be prepared to get punched in the dick.
Do not actually do this unless you are positive that your players will treat it as a fun surprise.

File: Spoiler Image (593 KB, 590x1017)

593 KB PNG

>>97174460
What was your larger plot, anon? If it's already happened and is in the past tense, it won't ruin things for your players. I'm involving the Amaranthine Syndicate in Acreage's happenings who're flaring the civil war up with weapons shipments and then exploiting the chaos to go om nom nom. Attached is a data-slate.

>>97174610
That's the kind of bold-but-crazy-good twist you can pull with a classic Forgotten Realms dnd campaign and then send your players right into Planescape, though I never had the balls to try it for real.

>>97167043
>Space Marines don’t see the Emperor as a god
But why would they? They have the power, independence, and age to see the Ministorum for what they are; a tool of social control and surveillance. They have the ability to travel multiple worlds throughout the galaxy and see the lies told on each world. Every preacher a new religion, and about the guy you're gene-descended from, that some of your dreadnaughts met and remember for the man he was.

What is the principal difference in unit design between Vampire Counts and Tomb Kings?
As far as I can see, Vampire Counts are more elite (although that may change if Grave Guard or Blood Knights get nerfed, as Wailing Dirges were). They lack big monsters and shooting, but have strong duel-oriented heroes and good cavalry. Tomb Kings, on the other hand, seem to have more "trap" (weak or inefficient) units, and even their good units are not particularly strong. However, they do have shooting, war machines, and big monsters. Chariots are not my thing, so I'm excluding them from consideration. Tomb Kings also can't really "tank" a hit with their infantry - "elite" Tomb Guard are worse than Grave Guard, and "horde" Skeleton Warriors are more expensive Zombies (and can't be raised over their initial numbers). Archer bricks don't work that well anymore, after the poison nerf. That said, this is only the current state - tomorrow Grave Guard might be nerfed as well, so relying on a single strong unit is probably unwise. Everything good eventually becomes bad.
Overall, playstyle is probably what I should be focusing on. However, I haven't played either faction, nor have I watched them played.
Could you offer some advice? Between Tomb Kings and Vampire Counts, what is the principal difference?

>>97174814
>What is the principal difference in unit design between Vampire Counts and Tomb Kings?
ones evil the other is just cringe and loves gold.

>>97174795
you did good anon, he looks really cool

>>97174823
gameplay-wise, I mean

mold lines on eternal guard seem minimal, which is nice. I hope the same is for the glade riders.

>>97173724
*draw for turn, going second.

What do y'all hope will be on the next banlist? Genesys or Advanced, as while only the former is confirmed for Monday, it feels like both are going to be coming out around the same time.

>>97174634
I hope they don't cave to the crybabbies by hitting Droll.

>>97174757
If you are talking Genesys, Droll is getting hit. It's one of the very few cards mentioned in both the Bologna recap as well as the What to Expect update. I expect that it's going to at least 10, possibly higher.

And before you start to mention people making a lot of searches, Utopia is the biggest example of that sorta style and it has had several cards in the main and extra mentioned in the What to Expect, so combo extending searchers are also gonna get hit.

Additionally, handtraps and similar interruptions or field clearers are going to be getting a buff, as counters to them such as Crossout Designator and Traptrix Rafflesia (via setting an activateable Floodgate Trap Hole) are also preconfirmed to be hit. So while you may not be playing Droll, the ones you do play will be actually resolving more.

As they stated in the Bologna blog, from the data they have, the problem is both Droll and what Droll is countering.

>>97174757
Same but for standard.

>>97174612
Thank you, anon!

>>97174794
>At least, that's what I try to do too
My brother. There's this weird lack of overlap of classic scale model painting techniques when it comes to Warhammer, imo. It feels like there is either 'eavy metal or "drown it in streaking grime" grimderp and not much in between.

>>97174794
The little paintings are my favorite part

>>97174794
Ye, Conrad was a cool guy. Shame he was assassinated, I feel that he could have achieved more.
>>97174799
The caparisons were left plain since I couldn't be bothered paint them or spend a lot of time researching early caparisons. I believe that tabards and caparisons usually weren't made to show the blazon of the wearer, instead the early ones were a single color that didn't match the blazons. Heraldry itself was still in its infancy at the time, most being simple boring geometric shapes.

File: IMG_6303.jpg (637 KB, 890x809)

637 KB JPG

I am learning how to highlight and working on test schemes for some Bolt Action Italians. Going for a less realistic Grigio-Verde leaning into bluer tones. If I want to attempt to do one more even lighter highlight should I stick to just edge highlighting?

Just looking to get feedback on the uniform.

File: IMG_6301.jpg (1007 KB, 1073x1362)

1007 KB JPG

>>97174885
Back

I have the stupidest concept party ever, but it only works with the 2014 rules because of how the wording of a certain feat was changed going into the 2024 rules.

If you have a character concept that works with only one version of the rules, like the 2014 smites or the 2024 two-weapon fighting, how do you and your group resolve this at the table?

>>97174522
>playing space fantasy game
NO MY CHARACTER HAS A DEBILITATING FEAR OF SPACE FLIGHT AND ADVENTURE
>they have pills that permanently cure these phobias for 5 credits
STOP OPPRESSING ME MY CHARACRER WOULDNT TAKE THAAAT

>>97174569
I tell people which edition we’re using ahead of time. I assume most groups would do the same.

If you mean you want to make a concept work for one edition when we’re playing a different one I’d just say no. It’s like one anon who said his DM said the spell doesn’t work that way because that’s not how it works in pathfinder. It is a completely moot point as we’re not playing that version of D&D.

>>97174569
>how do you and your group resolve this at the table?
Case by case basis. Same as if a player wanted to bring in some specific homebrew class or the like.

File: Bremen.band.500pix.jpg (114 KB, 500x891)

114 KB JPG

Are you allowed to stack mounts in 5e, if each is one size larger than the other?

File: Start-ww2-scenery-1.jpg (267 KB, 1080x1080)

267 KB JPG

>>97174560
How is it better than pic related?

>>97174745
>inb4 muh SOVL

As someone who uses both 3d printed stuff and hand crafted foam terrain I fully agree that 3d printed stuff is inferior. It will never look as good as a well crafted and painted piece.
Also crafting terrain is just a joy and anyone who hates it has no soul.

>>97174589
Go back to /tv/.

>>97174589
>hated by /hwg/
As much as he's being a faggot right now, I'm one of the few regular posters left there and I'd appreciate if you left me out of your gay anti-fan club.

>>97174745
TBF that's some pretty exceptional printable terrain, the painterly style possibly helps but it does look like the sculptor has put effort into not simply copypasting tiles and stones, which is unfortunately rare.

File: wander_and_gaius_by_harym(...).jpg (482 KB, 1169x827)

482 KB JPG

>>97166949
Third for GURPS. Especially if you use Combat Writ Large from Pyramid 3/77. Being huge makes you easier to hit, but gives you a discount on Strength, bonuses to grappling, bonuses to melee reach, and (if you're big enough) turns your melee attacks into Area Effect attacks and lets you trample over foes just by moving over them. Also, if you deal enough damage, then you can send foes flying with the Knockback rules. If using Combat Writ Large, then there are also rules for climbing onto a bigger creature, so giant characters can even become their own battlemap.

>>97166949
Mutants & Masterminds. Because it has probably the most streamlined, consistent and easily applicable system for punting people, buildings, ships and even planets. No matter what it is you can easily see if your character capable of punting it and how far. You can easily have a giant brawl in the middle of the city with giants throwing each other left and right, toppling buildings, squashing humies and throwing horses at each other. Or shoving a bell from the church tower over the head of your opponent and ringing it.

>>97168772
/thread.

>>97172729
I was right >>97167061

>>97174028
I think you're just paranoid

>>97173285
Oh no, 2etard = fishfag is sad again

>>97174176
like the mechanics are dogshit, but 2nd ed has the most iconic settings in D&D history. Dark Sun? yes please, that would be a cool contribution to /nusrg/ threads. 2nd Ed, ACKS, i don't care, as long as people keep the shitflinging to an acceptable amount

File: file.png (675 KB, 1612x1155)

675 KB PNG

>>97174356
I don't have a problem with people who like 2e: by all means talk about it if you want.

I was talking to ONE specific troll known as fishfag, 2etard, nightlandsfag, and multiple other nicknames, who's been trolling /tg/ for a few years. He's been trying to hijack /osrg/ specifically every couple days or so for weeks, creating literally tens of troll threads that are regularly shot down and bitching and whining about how /osrg/ and /nsrg/ are not to his liking while NEVER contributing anything constructive to any discussion. Except for three character sheets he's shared that are full of errors, showing he's never even played a single game in his life.

>>97174509
>he's never even played a single game in his life.
man that sucks, i kinda know that feeling. got my first rulebook (wfrp 1st ed) in middle school and hung out on irc, but didn't have anyone to play with until uni. even now i have like 7-8 systems on my shelf that i'll prob never play. good thing there's a fuckton of crpgs for AD&D though, like the gold box stuff and baldur's gate. wouldn't wish the no games misery on anyone.

>>97174645
I'd have empathy for him as well were he not the most obnoxious and retarded troll on the whole of /tg/ (and he's up against some fierce opposition!)

>>97173157
Not that I'm aware of.

Fans made a bunch of artwork coupling Guill with that Eldar Yvinne lady, but that's just fans being coomers. There isn't anything official declaring or implying they had a physical relationship.

>>97173177
Roboats mom "rewarded" him when he was a good boy as a classical Roman would

>>97172457
>Bigger = more powerful
Oi, dese gitz is stealin our schtick!

>>97172457
Do you often think about cock OP?

Mersadie Oliton described Loken as 'equine' upon first meeting him (while he was changing).

Then there was a Grey Knight attached to an Inquisitor's retinue

"On more than one occasion I’d stood with her and her warband in the communal showers after training, blind and numb to any sensation of desire, watching her wash her hair and listening to her speak of serving in the sweltering jungles of Voroxis, killing heretics who spilled from a downed rogue trader vessel.

Bizarrely, the Khatan had declared, upon seeing me wash myself, that my ascension to knighthood was ‘a great shame’. Captain Castor had explained the meaning to me several months later, though I still didn’t see the humour in it."

So apparently women don't think they're small.

>>97149108
Serious response, the 18mm (honest 15mm) AB models are beautiful and are good for the same reasons

Did anyone get WWIII: Checkpoint Charlie or think it's interesting?

File: image0 (19).jpg (3 MB, 3024x4032)

3 MB JPG

Finally finished the box of french infantry, at least to tabletop play levels. Might add a wash an some grass later.

Now I got my english army complete, and all of the french but the cavalry complete.

File: 20251213_222806.jpg (4.57 MB, 3768x4712)

4.57 MB JPG

Some acceptable photos of my knights now. Glad heraldry was still simple during the 12th and 13th centuries.

28mm Barons War minis by Footsore that I'm using for the Barons War Outremer expansion. The one in red is my leader, the historical figure Conrad of Montferrat, one of the leaders during the third crusade and was instrumental in preventing Saladin from capturing Tyre and later being elected king of Jerusalem before being murdered by the Assassins. His standard bearer flies the blazon of Jerusalem but his shield indicates he's from Ibelin.

>>97173903
>>97174759
Nicely done lads!

>>97173657
Cool cool. I'll be here lurking the thread and the next one.

>>97171569
have you posted this years ago? I'm almost certain I had completed this in 2022/2023. That logo was on a sythe, and I think I gave it multiple robot arms, but the gold skull stuff wasn't on the request. The white and black logo just teleported me back 3 years. fuck dude. I dig up the picture later on today.

File: hello.png (483 KB, 1202x1381)

483 KB PNG

>>97171569
I have one with the ortho cross if you'd rather that. If this was you I asked about here >>97173939, this might be the first "complete" drawing ive done since 2022/2023. weird timing

>>96996021
Bump!

>>97173939
I swear its just a coincidence because I just had the idea for this character and introduced him this year; I guess my idea wasnt that original or unique What you posted work fine just as well its very close to what I had in mind, if I get a second specific cake for this request thats good but I won't request again in the next thread then

File: Fighting.jpg (108 KB, 800x591)

108 KB JPG

>>97171369
Love the "without Number" stuff. Crawford is a genius. ACKS is also a ton of fun. It sounds like you're touching on something I've been thinking about: keeping the number of rolls to a minimum to keep things moving.

I still get stuck on rolling separate damage and "hit" rolls. I might need to slaughter that sacred cow in my own design and embrace the philosophy of : if you hit you'll do at LEAST some minimum damage, with additional successes upgrading that damage severity.

>>97171531
Cleave is an interesting mechanic and seems to really give fighters that extra OOMPH. I also really like the DCC "heroic deeds" option to set martials apart.

>>97171644
I've never played savage worlds. I heard it gets a little overly gonzo/cinematic?

>>97171685
I'll answer your question first. I think my game will appeal to someone who enjoys fast, brutal, and decisive combat that leans INTO its historical inspirations rather than heroic fantasy. Rolling almost never results in a "neutral" or non-result. Even if damage isn't dealt, there's often some other effect that happens (e.g. the dagger wielder moves into close range, the warrior lunges for a clinch, the enemy is knocked back or disoriented- suffering a penalty to the next attack, the combatant positions themselves in such a way as to maneuver an enemy between their ally so as to avoid being flanked, etc). It grants details that I'd like to be represented in games; such as armor, hit locations, etc, but does so in a way that requires fewer cognitive steps or mechanical knobs. The core resolution (dice pool, count successes) also feel more plausible and mimc skill probability growth in measured skills. The best part is it's simple to do. No reading numbers, just throw dice and look for 5's, 6's explode. That's it. Compare who has the most successes and describe what happens.

>>97173164
>gonzo/cinematic
wouldn't call it that, at least not the pathfinder for savage worlds.
each character has skills & attributes that are represented by die types, and edges.
there are classes but they are just a series of edges and don't define your character.
player characters all got a max 3 wounds and each time they take damage all their rolls are reduced by the number of wounds they got (although some edges change that).
so let's say I'm a human fighter attacking a goblin with, my fighter has a d10 in fighting and a d10 in strength. I choose to attack the goblin twice (incurring a penalty of -2 to my rolls for the extra action)
first attack:
I roll 1d10 for fighting and 1d6 for luck (all player characters have this for all rolls). I got 6 on my fighting and 6 on my luck, the luck die exploded so I roll again - to a total of 11, I use 11 as my final attack roll because it's higher, subtracting 2 to a final result of 9.
the goblin has a parry of 8 so I hit.
I roll damage - 1d10 for strength + 1d8 for the sword I use. to a total of 5, the goblin has 8 on his toughness score so I do no damage.
second attack:
I roll a final result of 14 (thanks to exploding dice), because I got a number that is higher than the parry of the goblin by more than 4 I add another d6 to my damage dice.
my total damage this time is 12, if it were lower than the goblin would only be stunned by my attack (and thus need to roll on his spirit attribute to try and snap out of it next turn) but I got a number higher than his toughness by more than 4 and inflict a wound on him.
the goblin is just a minion and thus has only one wound. he dies.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>97173164
Literally none of this is an answer to my question, it's just an assertion with nothing supporting it.
>I think my game will appeal to someone who enjoys fast, brutal, and decisive combat that leans INTO its historical inspirations rather than heroic fantasy.
I am that someone. So far you've failed to give me a single reason why it would.

>>97173111
>Game Efficiency = resolution speed / mechanical depth (or complexity).
I draw a distinction between mechanical width and depth. You can add 1000 perks to a skill tree but if each one is "+5%" then theres a very broad but shallow scope to the system. "Force a target to repeat their previous turn" is a single ability, but the applications are nearly limitless.

The way you have the formula set up the most efficient games are ultra fast with no complexity, but i dont think that would produce a fun experience

>>97170262
My problem with opposed rolls is that it makes GM roll and absolutely silly amount compared to players. Which I guess is fine if GM likes to roll constantly, but personally I find it distracting when my mentality is already being drained by thinking how I will fix the issue of players deciding to drop that necessary NPC prisoner into lava with the door key he was holding.

File: 1763504947648906.jpg (26 KB, 540x385)

26 KB JPG

>>97154762
>sir, your mine was impounded for unpaid taxes and aggravated use of a Scottish accent.

File: file.png (26 KB, 505x106)

26 KB PNG

>>97154762

>>97154776
No true son of the mountain would screw his fellow Dwarf out of his rightful property.
He'd offer to let the Dwarf buy back his mine using proceeds from said mine and then go into partnership afterwards

>>97171379
The mine was promised to me 3000 years ago.

File: 1734418491838981.jpg (49 KB, 710x473)

49 KB JPG

>>97154776
>buying back rightful dwarven property
>buying back rightful dwarven property from an elf
>buying back rightful dwarven property from an elf THAT WAS STOLEN BY THAT VERY ELF