>>11763006

The current study provides interesting and relevant contributions to the literature by examining the relationship between looking preferences to gendered toys, objects, and faces and parents' attitudes, as well as children's toy exposure. It is among the first to study toy preferences at a range of ages in infancy and suggests 15 months to be the time window around which gender-specific toy differences may emerge. Further, it investigates the relationship between prior exposure and toy preferences. The study contributes knowledge to theoretical approaches regarding the development of gender-typed preferences, which may be restricted and related to specific toys under investigation. Although human evolution provides biological potentialities, the conceptions and roles of gender may be the product of a broad network of social influences (Bussey & Bandura, 1999). The development of gender-specific toy preference may be a result of biological, cognitive, and socialization factors (Alexander & Hines, 2002; Fausto-Sterling, 1992; Hines, 2010; Martin et al., 2002; Ruble, Martin, & Berenbaum, 1998) working together for children to reach the patterns observed in adulthood (Alexander & Hines, 2002; Fausto-Sterling, 1992; Hines, 2010). In conclusion, our study illustrated gender-specific toy preference among infants aged 6 to 20 months, with a gender difference emerging at around 15 months. Age, stimuli characteristics, infant daily motor activities, experience with toys, and parental attitudes all appear to play a role in the developmental trajectory of such preference, shaping the current and future perception and cognition across infants.

File: boys faces girls cars sex(...).jpg (137 KB, 945x756)

137 KB JPG

>>11763005
>>11763006
>>11763008
you're genociding women by posting this!

The fact that babies prefer faces for the first year of life is well documented and is probably because the babies are engrained to female faces, due to needing their mommies to survive. This is also why male faces aren't prefered as much, despite being up against a stove. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4262701/
So as they grow up, the connection with mommy is slowly being lost. Even with sounds, humans brains respond differently to female voices than male voices, where the brain responds to the female voice as if it were music instead of just a normal sound. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15978839/

So this also shows that there is an innate bias TOWARD women at birth, possibly before even being birthed since a fetus will react positively to light in the shape of a human's face. And despite this inborn bias, males will start wanting cars over bitches.

Also, the fact that they used stoves was funny.

>>11763455
I feel kind of bad for girls. They obess over pretending and playing as adult women only yo hate it all by their mid 20s. Imagine playing cleaning and hating cleaning. Playing with babies and hating babies.

Most of them have a preference for it. Or it ks conditioning from sister's and mom's. Boys and adult men dont give a fucking shit what little girls play with so long as they dont shreak

My sister bought my nephew a Barbie car and he never touched it. It's because he watched this Barbie cartoon but I think it's more. "Woah, cool teenagers doing teenager stuff!" instead of Barbie shopping with the girls. He is obsessed with growing up.

>>11770819
>He is obsessed with growing up.
yes, a lot of kids go through this phase.
I tried to hide my power level in high school and pretty much quit buying toys and comics. If i did any nerdy things, it was through group consensus, like playing video games

>>11765665
ahh, excellent, thank you. I will definitely keep an eye on the price, prolly nab him to combine shipping somewhere.

well shit, that's image limit, Someone wanna bake new bread?

>>11765689
>>11765689

>>11765617
>Why are you repainting Devastator
They're not though?
That's something you decided was their intention, but they never did. They're repainting 1, possibly 3 guys. Not all 6.

>>11765649
Lol-bat

>>11765492
>of something that got announced, like, today?
the gundam movie was announced in like 2019 It's just been in development hell.

File: Retroblasting .jpg (309 KB, 832x1248)

309 KB JPG

>>11758006
I suspect Playmobil

>>11758006
>not painting it to make it look less plastic.

>>11758062
Yep

https://www.ebay.com/itm/176622356601?chn=ps&_trkparms=ispr%3D1&amdata=enc%3A1F4Goo92ZRWywGEo_A6OK_g29&norover=1&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-167653-786486-8&mkcid=2&itemid=176622356601&targetid=325425753764&device=c&mktype=pla&googleloc=1026339&poi=2818&campaignid=20784063734&mkgroupid=158211146320&rlsatarget=pla-325425753764&abcId=&merchantid=101674002&gad_source=4&gad_campaignid=20784063734&gclid=CjwKCAjwhe3OBhABEiwA6392zCT2GhEe4YvtrK7WkEA55F9LuLMDE-XxWJxBo_-HovFiGVCWf3__bhoCvbsQAvD_BwE

>>11758296
Is that Destiny in the bottom left

>>11759915
kek

File: 1650579448161.jpg (1.21 MB, 1461x3717)

1.21 MB JPG

>>11752197
>>11773332

Hey if anyone is after these, the Beetlejuice 2 shrunken head guys/Bob figure is in stock on Target:
https://www.target.com/p/neca-beetlejuice-action-figure-ultimate-bob-7--34-/-/A-1010571005

As is the Sandworm pack:
https://www.target.com/p/neca-beetlejuice-action-figure-12----ultimate--matador--beetlejuice---sandworm-2pk--no-aasa/-/A-1010571004

Child’s Play 2 turned out to be a secret Haul-a-thon drop. They were showing up on eBay today, so I swung by my local Target and found two of em. Much cheaper at store price, especially considering eBay sellers want shipping.

>>11763288
that's wild man

New thread:
>>11764968
>>11764968
>>11764968

>>11764970
We didn't need a new thread yet

File: Goblin2.jpg (1.08 MB, 3072x4096)

1.08 MB JPG

>>11765740

>>11760586
Still ordered her at GD.

>>11765717
>Get in the bag!

>>11765760
>>11765760
New thread

>>11765717
are they from something or are they OCs

>>11765897
OCs. Sometimes the company making them posts 4koma comics about the characters but that's about all the development they have going for them.

new thread >>11763697

>>11763169
His upper torso really should be bigger

>>11762733
I actually hate this torso on that goku black
>>11762764
But yeah I guess it looks fine as an UI goku torso

>>11763028
Based

File: callit.gif (1.48 MB, 328x328)

1.48 MB GIF

>>11763698
>54 images before the image limit

>>11765253
"Because fuck you that's why" is not an argument. If you don't have a good reason to do it then don't.

>>11765523
You can't stop me

>>11766628
No, but now I won't be posting in your threads if that's your attitude.

>>11767248
You act like anyone cares about you

>>11768931
Who's to say I will be the only one that leaves? Nobody likes your selfish conduct and people continuously voiced their displeasure with your tendency of making threads too early but instead of listening to the criticism or explaining why you think it's a good idea you tell us to simply "deal with it" when in reality we don't have to do that and we can just hide your threads instead. Furfag General is a niche topic on a niche board, the number of regular posters in these threads is already practically in single digits so even a few people leaving will turn the place into a ghost town, if that's what you want then you do you. You stand to gain absolutely nothing by stroking your petty ego and plenty to lose by not even trying to get along with everybody.

>>11760843
>Japan has no issue creating new toylines that sell well look at chiikawa
I had to look it up but it's based on a manga that got popular first, then it got an animated series.

>and everyone loves blokees
That's a Chinese company, not Japanese. All Blokees are based on super popular brands like Marvel, Transformers, Disney, Minions, etc. So how is this relevant to your argument?

Different sized companies in different markets are not comparable. Playmates' customer is the retailers. Very small companies can sell directly to consumers if that's how their business model is built and they can sustain it, but Playmates is absolutely not like that.

File: mqdefault.jpg (19 KB, 320x180)

19 KB JPG

>>11760854
>Different sized companies in different markets are not comparable. Playmates' customer is the retailers.
Oh right america is a nation of retards that worship brands and have to buy whatever slop is available locally

>>11760856
it's just how the toy industry works in most of the world. it's not all about boo stupid americans or woke shit.

>>11760299
I wonder if Playmates would find any success with Aliens and Predator.

>>11757827
>Get Invincible license
>Make good 6 inch Invincible line by copying the Chinese and Japanese's toy designs
>Profit
It's really just that easy.

File: Screenshot_20260430_17192(...).jpg (468 KB, 2340x1080)

468 KB JPG

>>11773866
Alioramus

File: 20260501_003036.jpg (2.07 MB, 4000x2252)

2.07 MB JPG

>>11762341
Nanmu Spino finally arrived, so as promised here it is with the HC Spino

File: 20260501_003131.jpg (1.37 MB, 4000x2252)

1.37 MB JPG

>>11774242

File: 20260501_002502.jpg (1.94 MB, 4000x2252)

1.94 MB JPG

>>11774243

File: 20260501_002514.jpg (1.4 MB, 4000x2252)

1.4 MB JPG

>>11774244
God the paint is so good on this guy

>>11758703
at least you have a shitty taste in music to match your shitty taste in figures.

>>11759660
take a vacation kid

>>11758978
Thanks, but no. Have a nice chicken jockey day.

File: 1759657452116512.jpg (3.17 MB, 4096x3072)

3.17 MB JPG

>>11760468
minecraft child, you're not ready for MetyToyz

>>11758985
There are basically no sci-fi figures being made outside of retarded insect people.

>>11762532
>>11762404
Both of you deserve to be smited by Allah

>>11762545
There is no "war", just use the thread meant to discuss lego and not the one meant to waste space on the catalog and encourage /pol/ack discussion.

>>11762566
Both are awful, I am tired of these shillholes flooding this catalog

File: bricktsar.png (262 KB, 532x308)

262 KB PNG

>>11762392
brittle blue bricks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHnNNZbwaNQ

>>11762392
Yes.
Dark Red
New Brown (aka current brown)
Dark Blue
Pearl Gold
Blue in technic pins

In my experience all have brittleness problems from the 2012-2016 sets. Some say even earlier going all the way to 2008, but I dunno. It sucks cus 2012-2016 is quite a lot of sets and a TON of possibly defective pieces. Not all of them will be defective.

>>11763863
Walky, wiigii is one of his old screen names.

>>11763970
why did you think we'd know that

>>11761829
>>Tra Gen LDR Energon Scorponok
This is so random

>>11760567
>I don't even think it's the old Geewun boomers anymore I think half of them are too laden with arthritis to pick up toys anymore.

you guys seriously think people turn 50 and just fade away when it's very easily provable that they're still collecting.

>>11763970
No, #wiigii was the IRC channel where Walky and his clown college posse used to hang out. It comes from a mispelling of "woohoo." Later it was adopted as the informal name of their little woke gang.

>>11763079
Yeah I don't understand that mentality. In this particular case, the Teegra figure for example, looks extremely close to the Frazetta art, I don't know how someone could describe it as a "tranny", the head is basically a heart shape. In the case of Xesray, I assume he mainly means Gold Hildr, who is quite clearly modelled after the classic, heroic, strong Germanic/Norse design, she isn't going to have some soft effeminate face, but then these people would consider women like Sandahl Bergman, Brigitte Nielsen and Lucy Lawless "trannies" these days, despite being warrior women icons of the past that inspired fantasy. A combination of "thou doth protest too much" and projecting his specific ideal as an objective universal truth. It's a strange western witch hunt compulsion, like narrowing down the destructive mentality behind things like modern Star Wars, Blizzard or Bioware to whether a woman in some media has a jawline or not as the indicator to the presence of said mentality, regardless of context, and in this case, despite them having ample tits, wide hips and being basically naked which are all contradictions to it.

File: Street-Fighter-X-GI-Joe.jpg (1022 KB, 1080x1170)

1022 KB JPG

SF movie in the FALL, Hasbro has the licence for figures, SDCC in the summer. Hope to finally see them revive the collab.

>>11763530
Oh God please no.

>>11763530
>>11763811
I'd settle for just having the classified team make the movie figures, like how the Black Series SW team also handled the Indiana Jones line. They can even reuse already existing parts from classified, like the bare torso, arms, and feet. I just want the the SF figs in the same style so I can use the extra gear in my parts box for them.

>>11763530
>movie style chun li, then retro classic style chun li and cammy
yes! YES!

>>11763232
Never.

Trapjaw is live on Amazon frens, no Mattel Club needed

https://www.forbes.com/sites/timlammers/2026/04/28/roger-sweet-he-man-action-figure-creator-dies-at-91/

>>11761073
mastas of da univas

>>11752028
i can't believe it's not butter