Men are waking up to the true nature of reality
>>16869119Lol imagine figuring this out now in 2025, 5 years after dancing covid nurses. My best friend is a faggot. And me and him have had many conversations about how women are just utterly disgusting. If I wasn't so weirded out by having sex with dudes I would totally be a faggot. I've met maybe 3 smart women in my life if you count my grandma. Women are dumb as shit.
>>16869131You should watch this video and listen to this song and if you still don't appreciate women I don't know what I can do for you.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SVbc_Fwbt50&list=RDSVbc_Fwbt50&start_radio=1&pp=ygUOaGVpbHVuZyBhbm9hbmGgBwHSBwkJKQoBhyohjO8%3D
How can my schizophrenia help me in advancing science?
>>16869060Sign up for clinical trials on treatments for schizophrenia.
>>16869060>sciencewell, you could study physics cause it's made the fuck up
>>16869060Schizophrenia just means youre consciousness is on a higher level compared to the npc. Use it to debunk evolution and brain consciousness theory
Full blown schizo here. You just see things that are so unbelievable but so elegant and simple and it all makes so much fucking sense. Some of the basics I figured out on my own like the colour of different stars defining the personality so you say of what different life might be like in their solar systems but when you see what's out there it's just so mindblowing there's no limit of words I can say and you'd understand nothing from them. I've been posting my schizo nonsense lately but nobody seems to notice. Like if I tell you there are insectoid robots from outer space that turn themselves into organic life you're just gonna say I'm retarded, but literally the only cool thing about my life are my hallucinations and I know what I see is true. I don't think anyone can become schizo, but my method was basically semen retention, extended periods of not sleeping and a fuckton of weed. Can't just sit around getting high though, you need to have a dynamic lifestlye. You'll meet people and things will line up if all you want is knowledge. Reality is so far beyond what our sci-fi has imagined, and some of our sci-fi wasn't merely imagined. You just wouldn't believe, and nor would I if I hadn't seen some of these things myself. I wish you well.
>>16869116>>16869121>>16869127Sorry I fucking disconnected a million times trying to post. Now I look silly.
I'm looking to learn graph theory and am wondering which book would be a better choice, "Combinatorics and Graph Theory" by John Harris or "Graph Theory" by Reinhard Diestel? Thanks in advance, autists.
>>16868755Check out Graph Algorithms the Fun Way by Kubica
>>16868764And are there any good books that understand all of mathematics needs to be rewritten as pseudocode instead of all this jewish schizo shit?
>>16868755>A proper math book>that includes algorithms and programming exercisesPick only one.
>>16867801Introduction to Analysis on Graphs Alexander Grigoryan
>>16868755>>16869068Here.
how far away are we from being able to be luke skywalker and farm moisture from the desert?
>>16868671most people here are college zoomtards, this should be common knowledge, the level of interaction has gone down drastically since covid
>>16868671Lol retard.
>>16868473Look up atmospheric water generator. All you gotta do is feed electricity and you get water from air. The moisture in air, the better the efficiency
>>16868484mmmmmmmmm microblastic-infused water................
>>16868671If it's so easy, why don't you have a Nobel Prize?
The qaratic was deemed impossible to solve until the 16th century and this jewish galois chud allegedly says this image right here is not possible to solve.
>>16868972Mimicry is a high form of flattery. Thank you.
>>16868967>Surely one proof with AC should suffice. :^)as for without, they are constructivist or intuitionists, that's all, AC ain't either of those things
>>16869057>There are two categories of mathematicians >Those who include AC and those who don't in proofs>AC has nothing to do with either of these categoriesRetard lol
>>16869059Dude, you're stupid as fuck. Just leave this site and learn how to read.
>>16869063I accept your concession.
How do astrophysicists actually know that once a cloud of gas becomes big enough, it collapses into a star? Such a process has never been observed. No one has replicated this in a lab at any scale.
>>16865958because newly formed stars are commonly found around giant clouds of gas.
>>16865958You can see this happening in real time. Herbig–Haro objects and protoplanetary disks.
>>16865958Nobody knows anything. We just have models that seem to work. They came up with this idea, it explains a lot, models a lot and everyone who tried to come up with a better idea that accounts for things better failed.
>>16865958https://www.space.com/hubble-telescope-new-star-fs-tau-b#
>>16866695You mean they looked and found a star near some gas? Heckin science bros
It's too controversal for A.I. to answer, and I know DNA effects your pheramones and there must be some inherent feature outside of diet, why do Asians smell so strange like plastic byproducts or like burning paint that's been rained on?
>>16866123I don't smell because I take a shower you silly pajeet
>>16865607Source for any of this you mentioned? Cause if you do basic self care like bathing, wearing deodorant, being in shape, and having a healthy diet you shouldn't smell bad at all, no matter your ethnicity.
>>16866829kill yourself trans normgroid filth.
>>16865893>this junk paper was actually published kek
>>16866829If that were true how come I smell a wooden vaguely cinnamon stench of classist white patriarchy from just your post? Scientifically speaking bitch
prove me wrong. hint: you can't
>>16867497shifting the burden of proof is not an argument you absolute fucking piece of shit scum retard
>>16867531Find me a published case where soneone had no detectable neuron activity and survived.
>>16867104I concede a bunch of monkeys and type-writers put out more inspiring work than the goyim, I contest either the output and activity are analogous to thought or thinking. 1 All thoughts are thoughts, 2 not all words are thoughts, 3 not all thoughts are words1 identity, 2 example, word generators 3 example, impressionsYou may doubt three, but processing can be applied to any of the sensations. Color is easiest to demonstrate for a match-like process to recall things which are of that color. Still another example is pitch or tempo adjustment of a song you presently recollect or even focusing on the different instruments in the arrangement. There are no proprietary activities of the wordcel except for the larger thought poverty of the alternatives. Now onto the special cases of words and symbols in general. If it is the case that some string contains a thought by itself then 1 one can suppose a transformation and invent a language which holds that all such strings could be such, given some specific processing criteria. 2 This sets up a condition of thought as relations, perhaps mathematical or beyond. This is naively invalid. If such things are 'relations' than this signifier is also which is tautological instead of elucidating. Instead of getting to the destination, the car is in some ditch along the side of the road. This almost exactly describes AI, except for a crucial element of training data, the driver trying to get back to the road. 1. reduce languages to some universal binary form and construct any arbitrary mathematical map2. the formulation permits any arbitrary definition of meaning to be any string, this general equivalence implies some kind of morphism as underlying meaningThe peculiarity of thought is not found in its expression. But I am speaking of an analogy where relations point to essential character. And in each side is an object that is real and one that is not. The man is thinking and illuminating, but not shining? No.
he's actually right, the biggest limiting factor in AGI is architecture, not even compute speed.
>>16867628Have you been on reddit?
Japan is about to DOMINATE quantum tech
>>16860011More quixels maybe
>>16861995The governments have more spending power.The citizens just choose to spend less of their taxdollars on this speculative hypetech.Strange times that so many individuals let the rich live rent free in their minds.
>>16866642>and breaking older shit tier encryption algoswhat modern encryption doesnt rely on prime numbers?
>>16860002fuck I should have sold my bitcoin when it was up
>>16869077Yeah either scale to match my acuity or beat yourselves the fuck out to quite honestly summarize the real world
I don't believe I could achieve a personality like Toji's through natural life progression. Will science and technology ever progress to the point that I could run a program that rewired my brain to have more "bad boy" characteristics?
>>16868911>platonic realmdoesn't exist. go take your cult back to the festering caves where it belongs
Psychology isn't /sci/ence or math
>doesn't exist. go take your cult back to the festering caves where it belongs
>>16868986Psychology comes from the brains interpretations. The brain is an organic supercomputer that can be molded through repetitive suggestions scientifically speaking.
>>16868984It exists chud. Plato said so
The Core Difference (Find vs Verify): Problems in the P class are those whose solutions are easy to find and easy to verify. Problems in the NP class only mean the solutions are easy to verify. To this day, nobody has found a fast method (polynomial time) to FIND the solution for NP-Complete problems.NP-Complete as the "Wall" of Obstruction: NP-Complete problems (like Clique or Subset Sum) are considered the hardest computational problems in the universe. For over 50 years, researchers have tried to solve these problems with P-Time algorithms, but NONE HAVE SUCCEEDED! The absence of a discovered solution is the strongest empirical evidence that fundamentally, FINDING a solution for NPC is much harder than simply CHECKING a solution.Cosmic Implications: If P = NP, then all the hardest optimization problems in the world—from designing the perfect drug, breaking all modern encryption codes (including banking and military), to creating a super AI—could be solved with relatively fast algorithms. The fact that encryption technology still works and optimization problems are still hard is the real-world evidence that rejects P = NPThe Answer was P = NP
Tell me ur Opinion here
>>16868918if i wanted to deal with the magic 8 ball's tripe i'd toy with it myself
Why is 3/3 equal to 1?Ok, so 1/3 is 0.33333 forever. 2/3 is 0.6666 forever. So, if that's the case, why is 3/3=1 and not 0.99999 forever? Where does the last little bit get added to 3/3 to have it equal 1?
>>16866952First we show a rational number is an upper bound on all the truncations of a repeating decimal if and only if it is an upper bound on the subset of truncations which consist of the nonrepeating part followed by a whole number of repetends. The forward implication is trivial; for the backward case, for any truncation of the repeating decimal, append digits until you reach a decimal of the desired form, and since the extended decimal is less than or equal to the upper bound on the subset, so is the original decimal. If we can find a least upper bound on this subset, it is a least upper bound on the whole set.The truncations in the subset can be written in the form [math]A + \sum_{k=0}^{n-1} B \cdot 10^{-mk} = A + B \frac{1 - 10^{-mn}}{1 - 10^{-m}}[/math] where A and B are non-negative rational numbers and m is the number of digits in the repetend. The number [math]X = A + \frac{B}{1 - 10^{-m}}[/math] is an upper bound. Let y be a rational number smaller than X; to show y is not an upper bound, we need to find an n such that [math]A + B \frac{1 - 10^{-mn}}{1 - 10^{-m}} < y[/math]. This holds iff [math]B \frac{10^{-mn}}{1 - 10^{-m}} < X - y[/math]; if B = 0, it is true for every n. If B > 0, then it holds iff [math]10^{mn} > \frac{B}{(1 - 10^{-m}) (X - y)}[/math], so a sufficient n can be obtained by counting the digits in [math]\left\lfloor \frac{B}{(1 - 10^{-m}) (X - y)} \right\rfloor[/math], dividing by m, and rounding up. Thus X is the desired least upper bound.
>>16863995This is probably correct when you account for apple material lost on the blade of the knife.
>>16867365cool
1/7 = 0.142857.. why is this important, after 6 unique digits the number repeats the same 6 digits, this is the only clue we have of our numerical system's finality, therefore 3.333... is only 3.333333 and that is not equal to 1/3 it is fundamentally incorrect from our current numerical system
>>16868932oh, i know that one, the following is integers, the realizatio of what it meansfor the decimals is up to the reader:142857*1=142857142857*2=285714142857*3=428571142857*4=571428142857*5=714285142857*6=857142142857*7=999999
Does anybody have any scientific theories as to how consciousness might persist after death? Or are we really just supposed to act like we're racing towards an empty void and that's okay
>>16868726>>16868728>>16868729Completely delusional and barely coherent.
>>16868689>This argument appears solid but the argument falls apart soon as you apply a Ship of Theseus analysis to the brain. Not just swapping out, but even fully duplicating infinite brains from parts of the brain. The problem arises of which is real you? The law of identity falls apart.It doesn't undermine his argument in any way, it just undermines your naive idea of identity and implies there's nothing real about it at all, let alone anything to survive death.
>>16868855Yes, dreams are often barely coherent hallucinations, what's your point, that you don't understand the concept of dreaming?
>>16868865>mongoloidal animal thinks passing out or being anaesthesized is like going to sleep and having sweet dreams
>>16867117Sorry but only based people persist after death
Woopsy, we made an 8th grade level mistake guys...we're very sorry. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4210929/https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5541280/
>>16868456>>16867355>They put high dose Cholecalciferol in rat poison which causes kidney failure in rats.because it is good for humans
and you might as well include k2 with your D, there is no upper limit and it specifically is needed for the interaction of D and bones
>>16868265I've not left my house in 2 years since I lost my job.
>>16868446>>168689068000 IU in a daily capsule. Get some.
>>16865623this picture makes me lol
Why are humans the only species that need to rinse their mouth, and brush teeth?
>>16868757>so most of them die before having teeth related issues.a lot die of teeth issues, you see it on stray cats
>>16868715>rinse their mouthYou're not supposed to rinse after brushing. Just spit out.
>>16868715Modern Oral Hygiene is so bad cause of all the refined sugars, high-fructose syrup, and other overprocessed junk in foods today. Also other animals do take care of their teeth. Primates like chimps use toothpick-like structures and in a form of cleaning symbiosis, crocodiles allow birds to pick food out of its mouth.>>16868842Pre Agriculture? You don't even have to go that far back in history. Prior to the Early Modern Era when sugar became far more accessible, most humans in the world had straight white teeth that you can still see on their skulls today.
>>16868941All sugars and acidic foods may damage your teeth, some fruits are worse than candy because they fibers get caught between your teeth creating a prefect breeding ground for bacteria.It's just that people naturally love sweet and acidic foods so as soon as we understood basic food processing we made terrible choices.
>>16868715It's diet, that's why when you look at a wolf skull the teeth are fine, not perfect but when you look at a dog skull that lived under modern conditions the teeth quality is very poor if they don't have regular dental care.
