speaking of gooning to laura,

>>96907834
This >>96907622 is turbo defensive? I'm making fun of you. But it's not fun anymore. You're boring. Keep posting about how I'm a schizo who spilled your drink and made your penis small.

>>96907901
I accept your concession.

If the guy that uploads the episodes on pixeldrain read this, can you please also upload the subtitles with the episodes?
thank you mate, love you

>>96905335
There is nothing more hilarious than the most stereotypical looking and acting shitlib imaginable getting fucked over by his own ridiculous purity tests.
>>96905693
He is honestly worse than Mercer. His entire shtick is creating heavily scripted shortform campaigns that allow him to pontificate at his players with his rehearsed le epic speeches.

Outside of DnD he is the most insufferable midwit imaginable who always needs to get the final word in.

>>96907307
yeah thats the joke

https://discord.gg/4bHqw4f7

I'm trying to get a painting discord going for /tg/ as a whole. Here's my best piece to prove I'm not a paintlet

File: 16c9442e34bf566f4564a5ede(...).jpg (71 KB, 600x900)

71 KB JPG

>>96905392
>loud mechanical sweating

>>96907307
based Retardes Administrates

Help me out here lads.
I got a warpsmith on the way for my red corsairs and have to decide his original chapter/warband. I was thinking Iron Warriors but thinking about it it feels the obvious basic choice.
What's a good alternative for you?

>>96910694
Sulfur.

>>96910694
Cards
Tattoos
Bile

>>96910790
Making variations on ItO's Arcanum that are still light and work with the system's design intentions is an interesting exercise and way to adapt the game back to a more traditional fantasy dungeon crawl without having to go full Mythic Bastionland levels of involvement.
>>96910817
>Ashes
Nice.
There's a decent inspirational magic spell/ability table in Mazerats if you haven't seen it for players who need a bit more to work with.

>>96910694
for me, it's the nail element
see you next month

>>96910823
Ok...Well I'm going to tell you straight up, "occult" is not an element, it would be more of a description or category that elements fall under or the means of using soul/spirit/life and flesh/blood and darkness/shadows in a way that is different than divine, or the method in which the "energy" is extracted.

How are you even differentiating soul, life, and spirit? You might be able to distinguish life in some way, but soul and spirit are going to be very hard to differentiate in any meaningful way. All of them are the "supernatural" aspect of life, where is the physical "Body" besides blood/flesh (no bone?) or "Anima" aspect?

Same with darkness and shadow, unless you are meaning to say darkness takes on malicious properties and shadow is more deceit, stealth, or possibly illusionary.

How is steam distinct from, as opposed to combined with, water+heat? Where/what do gasses and mist do if not under the domain of air, with smoke really being carbon particles (usually caused by fire) in the air? Fire and oxidation are really processes, not actually "things". Fire and rust are typically what happens when things are oxidized, fire being it's own element and rust usually being considered either part water or metal element.

Idk man. I like elements too, but some of these imo just don't work well.

>>96912328
Especially their farts and sweat

>>96912328
Boysmell…

The only bad part about girls is that they aren't bigger and stronger than me. Very unfortunate for me that my species isn't one of the many where the females are the dominant sex. I literally envy bugs. At the very least I can be glad that we aren't a biological tranny species like some forms of sea bass or clownfish. Imagine how gross that would be.

Boys act so fucking gay around each other

>>96912425
I blame the internet and atheism.

File: Skeleballista layout process.jpg (579 KB, 2022x1242)

579 KB JPG

>>96903600
I did something.. a little different. You could pretty easily give this guy a sling instead of a crossbow.

>>96902055
The latest I have is 2.02, no idea what the latest version is.

>>96905565
Yeah, that's the version I have. I'm not sure what changes have been made since then; I believe the most recent version is 2.06 or 2.07. Thanks anyway. :)

File: Screenshot_20251105_12042(...).jpg (338 KB, 1015x1474)

338 KB JPG

Is this a GW ork or something else,

>>96912378
Im not sure about the head but everything else is. Hands and weapons are from plastic RT ork kit. Torso seems like 2nd ed Ork, tho I'm not sure which one

File: One Yike.jpg (115 KB, 2048x1152)

115 KB JPG

>>96910682

>>96838617
thats what what makes it a shoddy knockoff you fucking goof

>>96910597
I agree with him, SWN and WWN were both incredibly disappointing and lame. They were my introduction to OSR and made me write off the entirety of it as low effort garbage for a few years.

>>96911290
how exactly are xWN disappointing and "low effort"

>>96912321
>How exactly
Can't really prove a negative other than telling you they lack in many ways that I found egregious. I'd sooner ask why you think they're high effort instead.

>>96910830
what did he/xhey/jem do?

>>96911645
Games were between 3,5 - 4h. I first tought we could get it sub 3, but as it turns out having some experience and knowing the rules just meant less time there but more time spent listening to the other teams discussions and trying to.counterplay them. Which is both real fun but also drags the game on for a bit more than I'd like.
It's kind of a miracle it works so well, the game really seems like it originally was a free for all doam game turned into a team game last minute

>>96910899
If you wanna know why so many games suck ass, this guy is the reason

>>96908368
>SETI
It's fine for a multiplayer solitaire euro. It sounds a lot better that it plays.

>the only other low mmr players for Pax Ren on BGA are smurfing poles
It's a special kind of hell.

>>96912068
Why are you so angry?

>>96912118
Because people who confidently spout wrong information based on a misapprehension of their own level of intelligence/capacity for logic are the worst, and should be shot in the stomach with cannonfire.

>>96912068

>t. my uncle worked at GW, speaking out of the ass without any proofs

>Bitching about semantic name
I'll type SG, because it's shorter. You retard can bitching all day all you want.

How come when AT got a big release all SG mysteriously got a huge content drought? Similarly when AI got their big releases the same thing happen. Oh wow unlike you i'm not speaking out of my ass. Meanwhile 40k/AoS unaffected. Oh wow they totally didn't get "their own machine"

>>96912159
Ironically I now understand. Go on.

>>96910729
You are partially incorrect- you need to roll for mesh on the trading post since rolling is the innate part of he "trade action" and you cannot trade on the tradepost without making it.
I also wouldnt say that getting gear from TP at gang creation is "allowed by any sensible person", gang lists exist for a reason, its already samey enough after 2 or 3 cycles- why speed the uniformization up?

>>96912354
What's it gonna take for her to marry me

>>96912393
money

>>96912354
What's it gonna take for her to let me lick her feet

>>96912366
Please post your deck. It can only have a Legends legend and you also have to post all decks in your LGS (to ensure nobody else is using the same legend).

>>96912366
Anti-tuck is inherently anti lgbtq which is the target audience of commander though

>>96897085
Round 2 game 1:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tup3g3ykXk

>>96904668
Poor Gukesh, he has no chance with a format like this.

>>96911083
This is a sign of poor education. Or he's trying to swallow his opponent's soul. I dunno.

>>96904668
Round 2 Game 2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dmyrfy33mk

>Auralnauts is over
>never ended up finishing their parodies of Ep 8/9
All things come to an end. I wonder if Darths and Droids will revive whenever another trilogy gets shit out in the 2030s.

My friend group is picking one of each of the legion starters tomorrow. Is there a way to build each for recon games? Do they have set lists included in the box or is there somewhere I can see some type of demo lists for the contents?

>>96872188
Nah that would be Rey Mary Sue

File: Starter list.png (1.83 MB, 1080x1440)

1.83 MB PNG

>>96911107
All the new Starter sets contain a list fit for an initiation game.
They are not perfectly balanced for a "real" recon game as Empire and GAR are both above the 600pts limit while Rebel and CIS are below but they are matched well enough in power level and activation counts. What's cool about these starter list is that they use all the model in the box and gives most of them upgrades which helps with grasping the rules.
>>96909561
Your minis should mostly be good (except for Palpatine and IRG, rip in pieces) but you may need to print new cards and you'll need:
>circles with a diameter of 2 inches for objectives
>range ruler or measuring tape for the 3-inches contesting distance and some other rules

File: 20241128_101058.jpg (5.51 MB, 7104x4636)

5.51 MB JPG

>>96911685
I'd personally like to use IRGs as imperial agents. There is enough weapon variety in the old kit to account for all the agent weapon options

File: already tired huh.png (85 KB, 498x253)

85 KB PNG

>a mere couple dozens of spam posts over multiple hours
I'm not seeing the results we're *fish*ing here for
get to work you worms, you rest when we tell you to rest

>>96909954
Which of the two guides should I read first?

>>96912143
neither
they are poorly written, contain little actual advice, and are mostly anon's personal bias he is trying to force on others
just read through the rulebook of your choosing and google whatever question you have
>but what rulebook should I start with
google it, there is more than plenty of this on the net

>>96912143
It doesn't matter that much, but since you have to pick it's probably better to read the DM one first, since the Player's one was put together by a different Anon who wanted to provide a different point of view.

Both collect advice from many different Anons from /osrg/ over a couple of years of revisions and improvements by the way, and the authors have been accepting constructive feedback, so feel free to drop comments or suggestions about it, if you feel like it. Or ask any questions, we'll be happy to help.

However, not sure if the Anons who wrote the two guides are here or in the real /osrg/ thread (this is a parody shitposting thread). So if you get no reply here, you might try there: >>96892196

>>96912143
>>96912374
>since the Player's one was put together by a different Anon who wanted to provide a different point of view.
I mean it was put together AFTER the DM one, so it's a reply/addition to an extent.

File: 01.gif (242 KB, 180x162)

242 KB GIF

This is how I play a ki-based monk

File: 202511.jpg (180 KB, 830x1030)

180 KB JPG

>>96904139
Bracers of dexterity and strength

I made and played a mounted archer once, back in 3.5 days.
It was cool and novel. It was also a mechanical mess, complicated combat, restricted where and how useful I was in a fight, completely consumed my Feats and Skills, wasn't pertinent in a major part of the game (indoors/underground), and ended up with a bad case of 13th Warrior Syndrome.

File: 202511.jpg (137 KB, 1920x1080)

137 KB JPG

This is how I play modern RPGs.

>>96896655
>>96911947
At least, it was memorable?

>>96912115
Only to me, really. The others only vaguely recall it. It was pretty limited and about 20 years ago.

>>96908331
What are your thoughts about any of the on-topic contributions to the thread?

>>96908369
bump

>>96888032
Sure, but that's mostly because Nuclear Physics would be more of a "derived" skill rather than a normal skill. It relies a lot on more basic skills such as Mathematics and Chemistry.

>>96887471
>>96887745
>backgrounds systems
It's all fine and dandy, but I just have two issues with these.
First, there is the Superspy/commando background trick.
>Oh, OF COURSE I'm good with a gun, I'm a superspy
>Oh, OF COURSE I know how to speak Mandarin, I'm a superspy
>Oh, OF COURSE I know how to diffuse a bomb, or hack a computer, or seduce a cutie... etc
There are backgrounds which can be used to justify close to any types of skills. At least having some guidelines about what can more common backgrounds can and cannot do (aka, have a small list of typical skills which each background would have) can help mitigate that, even if you allow people to come up with their own background.
Second issue is, giving characters skills which are not part of their background can go a long way to give them more depths.
You make a hacker character, with mostly hacker skills, but you drop a few points in "cooking" just for fun. In the end it makes the character much more colourful and it can end up being useful in the most unexpected situations in the game, which is also fun.

File: 3iieViq.jpg (44 KB, 537x652)

44 KB JPG

>>96886766
>>96912314
That being said, I like the way Scales does it, which is to have both a profession AND a hobby. This way you can easily make your hacker either stereotypical or not. Plus, it's expected that your hobby shouldn't be something too useful, so you don't need to sacrifice some precious skill points that could be put in shooting, to put them in cooking.
On top of that, they actually have a list of professions, listing three concrete stuff each professions is going to be skilled at, which at least mitigates the superspy background exploit.
The absolute best solution, IMHO, is to have a list of skills which are directly informed by the gameplay (for example: only have "research" as a skill research is something that happens regularly in actual play. If it's an investigation-heavy game, for ex), even if you just keep it at the back of your mind, as a guideline for what each broad background/archetype can and cannot do. And leave a little space for players to spice up their characters with skills/traits which only have a very low chance of coming up in play, which they can be free to invent potentially: ethnicity, hobby...