their excuse is that it reduce splastic consumption by 84% but it literally just a white cube that doesn't even display the product and no, they aren't making it cheaper.this has to be a joke
interior:
>>458354what is your problem and why would it need to be cheaper?
>>458354Bro, it is sold online, you already know what you are getting, why are you crying about it? Or are you one of those weirdos who buy toys and don't open it?
hi /gd/, since my portable photoshop has been disabled by those adobe shitsacks i didn't really find another vrs., i tried just two minutes ago and downloaded a trojan and freaked out lolhas anybody got a safe link?inb4>learn x/y/z softwarei am in a rush and i can use photoshop decently, i will eventually get to another one. any suggestions?
download from m0nkrus (w14.monkrus.ws)
>>457986a: photopeab: pirate Photoshop 7 (pre-CS), or CS2. They were giving it for FREE a few years back.
>>457986You can just make it so a few different adobe applications can't connect to the internet by setting it up in your firewall settings and be fine with the photoshop you have. Just check whatever is running in task manager.
>>458014be careful the russian monke is known for hacking your PC, better to buy a license anon it's just like 30 USD a month cmon are u poor or something?
Is this the goat of upscaling anime pictures?or is there something better now with new AI tech?
>>458227I think >>>/h/ will help you. They have a general about the subject.
>>458227Take the topazpillhttps://www.topazlabs.com/gigapixel
Are they any resources or guides explaining how best to caption videos in terms of pacing the cuts in the captions to match the cadence of the dialogue versus pacing the captions based on the strict visual appeal of each individual captioned phrase/segment in and of themselves, or grouping captions based on linguistic clauses?
>>457893prollybut end of day it really very simple: dont confuse the audience just cuz you have some hair brained idea about captions.
>>457893For basic technical standards you can look at closed captioning resources, check out "Major Considerations for Filmmakers" for the numbers-https://simpledcp.com/introduction-to-timed-text-in-dcps/That may be specific to some program but the basic minimum timing and legibility stuff is the same for any method.Anything you might do beyond that to add drama or humor or suspense or whatever to the delivery of subtitles is directing.
>>457893European TV and media has good standards, especially the Finnish telly.There's a lot of small details, but tl;dr: >give each word minimum of 0.3 seconds on screen.>don't be afraid of letting the text "over stay" on the screen after the character's stopped talking, especially when translating from another language.>if multiple characters talk right after another, consider showing both at the same time. Line break in-between.>Pure white font + black outline = easiest to read.>Font size should be at least 10% of the fame height, centered horizontally, and slightly elevated from the bottom edge. Some even take it as high as 2 to 3/5ths from the bottom.
>>457893it's mostly common sense but it depends on how difficult the prose is
Do literally anything with this image, repost in thread, next poster has to edit the last edit
>>457339
>>457350https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Murrelhttps://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Carrie_(musical)https://www.flickr.com/photos/163788372@N02/53975155281/https://youtu.be/lsAlFKXAMjM
Cool idea! Go for it
>>457353>>458063>>453462;)
>>458271
The color scheme is black, white and yellow. Somehow, The two main images in the center have to be combined. Thanks
>>>/wsr/
make the horizontal motion-blur wobblier or something or it looks too much like a stock effect
nice
ass
Yeah this is sick. Instant album cover.
Looks great!
Nailed it.
>>457688LOFL, no it doesn't. If anything the fact that non artists are aware and talking about it just means it's doing exactly what a logo and especially a redesign and rollout is imtended to do.Only someone completely ignorant of how this stuff works thinks that a new logo being an aesthetic improvement is the goal, or that people judging it as a "bad" redesign will create a net loss of customers or revenue for a company with massive market share in its space.How many times do the retards on this board need to be told that logo design and re-design isn't about artistic ideals or seeking the approval of self appointed critics on aesthetic grounds?
>>457968Okay buddy, you send out that rebranding proposal with the poop emoji as a logo. Wait for your promotion to land shortly after that. Surely, everyone will be talking about it, right(?)—since that's the unit of measure in design, and that's how you service a corporation's heritage, éllé-mayo. Scrub, you're underage and it shows.
>>458146LMAO>poop emoji as a logohave a little self respect, there's no need to embarrass yourself with retarded babbling strawman arguments that have zero to do with what anyone actually said or proposed and just make you sound childish and stupid.>be PayPal> hold 40.52% of the global market share of the payment service segment> so big your name is used as a verb for making online payments> make minor visual change to corporate ID> won't lose a significant amount of customers based on aesthetics, only self involved faggots care> won't attract a bunch of new ones either but it doesn't really matter since you own near half of the global market already> change causes corporate ID to be wailed about by silly wannabe critic faggots which makes the subject fresh in the minds of existing PayPal users and potential users, most of whom probably couldn't guess the name of PayPal's top competitor in a pop quiz but won't even look it up because PayPal instantly comes to mind if they need the service.> maintain 40.52% of the global market share of the payment service segment for the cost of a minor redesign with virtually no risk>repeat as necessary just like every other company with massive market share that tweaks their corporate ID slightly to trigger histrionics that get attention that helps maintain market share.
>>457950its just the name of the brand in futura. except they made the kerning slightly tighter and call it "PayPal Pro"it's not "simple to tell a story or evoke a feeling", it's just underdeveloped
Weirdos… all of you!
We need to do something about ugly UI epidemic.
>>456900Looks better than op's picture.
Totally agree!
>>456923it's a delusional reach because you don't like the conclusion
>>458346it's a delusional reach because trying to make your argument with an analogy is smoothbrain tier
I want to change the letters from WB to SF on this logo. I want the WB style font used for SF. Can anyone get that done?
wrong board, try /wsr/
>>458322ok, thanks.
constructive criticism only,,,
>>458153I have no criticism. This is absolutely fucking beautiful. Pure masterpiece. Thank you for making this.
If you have any free AI tools you've found on the web can you please share it with me here? For example stuff that does image enhancement or let you change things like the hair of someone, generate images etc... This will be very helpful
OP here, thanks for the bumps I guess? Anyway one of the best image generators I end up using during my job is this website:https://ideogram.ai/if someone knows something better please post it.
been using novel ai but its kinda pricy so im looking for free alternatives too but it works fine depending on what type of work you're doing if you're in the anime genre it's quite good
>>456304shitty loli isnt graphic design, coomer cunt
>>457909Thanks, I'll check it out
perchance.orgI was enjoying freepik before they ruined it
Not sure if this belongs here but since it's regarding photo manipulation (which counts as graphic design) I might as well try.So I like this genre of edits of women called "Natural/Modular Body Magic", which basically means that they look like they either had their heads magically removed or that they never had any at all but they can live just fine without them (like dullahans), but many of them are pretty shit so I wanted to make some good ones of my own, the problem is that there are no good tutorials online on how to make them, so I was wondering if you guys could guide me on how to make them.Pic related is more or less what I want to achieve, something that looks relatively natural and organic, rather than just a quick and sloppy MS paint job.
this is actually pretty based. good job OP
>>447559What the fuck is going on here??
>>447445Look like a got myself a fetish.
Sounds interesting
>>447445>see this thread>turn to look towards my PC case>two headless naked dolls are sitting on it
I came to work at 8am and had an unreasonable request for a flyer design by 9am, I just used AI to create an attractive text centerpiece and sent it for approval, they love it, what does this mean foe the future of the graphic design career?
>>457283interesting, the more I look at it, the more flawed it gets, but for anybody else I guess it look like Jessica Walsh tier hipness
Interesting times ahead
>>458051>Interesting times aheadThe Judge Dredd writers could it see it coming.
>>458213LOFL, "Job Stealing Robot" is a trope that's literally as old as labor saving machines. "Artists" who want people to think they are some kind of prophets have leaned on it so heavily and whined so hard that it became a self fulfiing prophecy.Fucking hilarious; churn out the same basic AF "creative work" over and over like a robot long enough and eventually people figure out that they might as well just use a robot that doesn't infuse its work with self absorbed whining.>The Judge Dredd writers could it see it coming.Wow, what visionaries!https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x6WWYef9MoM
>>458213life imitates art
