sup,/mu/sician here. looking for someone to do some album art for me. $75usd to your paypal or venmo or cashapp. re-create this album cover but with Kill Everyone instead of "This Romantic Tragedy". you do it good, you get paid. feel free to upload with watermarks. i'll upload some HQ images that you can re-build the cover with in the next few postssample of music in question:https://vocaroo.com/1lGQYjizcm3D
OP here, still open to more interpretations. if you do a good design, YOU GET PAID. don't matter who i go with in the end. show me your work
>>453836nah bro, hire a real designer with a real contract and a real budget, and you'll get some decent work
>>453860how bout i hire your dad to come kiss me on the lips?
>>453836gimmie some time op
>>453877shoot, I'll do that for free!
>>452605Why is this aesthetic wrapped in with the Windows 8 "Metro" theme? They were not even in the same decade. The colorful/grungy and flat style was a thing of the mid to late 00s. Windows 8 was released in fucking 2012. The style was already dying by the time Windows 8 came. There was nothing in this style that look remotely related to Windows Metro. And why is "Frutiger" even in the name? It doesn't have anything in common with Aero other than being in the same decade.These names people are coming up with make no damn sense.
whats the secret to making posters look professional? Im very good at proportions/perspective and it has always been my dream to make videogame covers and book covers and I now also want to sell posters online but have gotten bad feedback on pic rel, one that i worked ages on. I can't tell if its because it doesnt look professional enough or people just don't get that in the early 2000s, that was just the style, with the cropping and the lower resolution. How do I make it so i can make posters sell without losing my style?
>>454078>you don't understand that this is what posters looked like in y2k reeeeeeeeeethat was QUARTER A CENTURY AGO ago.maybe read into Peter Pan Syndrome and the idea of the Puer Aeternus?>I want to do posters now but at the same time mimic styles from when I was young and fresh and cool
>>454078you have to ell the prospective buyers exactly what they are getting and whyand then if they want that theyll buy it and not complain.also what a shitty photo to post do you really make stuff? terrible presentation. cant even see what there is going on in that
Anyone know what font this is or any similar one?I need it for an indesign thing. Also how do I change the fonts of all textboxes in indesign?txx<3
>>454080are you absolutely fucking retarded???????????????>>446976
I'm fucking around with some UV maps and need painting advice. The only real tool at my disposal is Gimp, but I have some photoshop experience.I want to clean up the blood, make multiple skin variants, and paint on some goggles/remove the collar. How would you guys go about this? Thank youuu
I guess I could do a color overlay and avoid areas like the teeth and eyes using layering
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/canva-acquires-affinity-design-suite-004813952.htmlRIP in peace Affinity Suite, you had such potentialHow do you think they will ruin it bros?
>>453791>I don't know why Affiinity products weren't mass adoptedAffinity Photo is shit. I found two things I cant do in it after 2 hours of use. Not to mention some stupid UI and UX decisions. Im amateur in Photoshop and I felt the downgrade...
I don't think they'd do anything drastic enough to put off their users. At least not right away.
>>453757Will this open the doors for a native Linux version of Affinity? Serif has cited the lack of funding as the main reason they couldn't make one. Now that they're owned by a $40 billion company, that shouldn't really be much of a problem anymore.
>>453776>is *the* source of Affinity's success.what success? also, RIP
>>454058the little success it had, dummy.
A splendid time is guaranteed for all
Anybody else just recreate stuff? I was organizing my e-book library and noticed the cover of this book was extremely low-res, and every other image I could google was either low-res or the wrong aspect ratio for my Kindle, so I just re-did it in photoshop lol.Have you ever done something like this anon? Maybe you recreated an obscure CD cover or the graphic for an out of print t-shirt? Show me!
>>453054Yes, but only if it's easy or I'm helping something bigger than me because my drive only works when those are the stakes
>>453097>my drive only works when those are the stakesthis
Attention is the only currency /gd/ is dead how can i use my knowledge & skill to get the most attention
>>453904Learn to use psychology? It is indeed a shame that /gd/ is so dead. I do not know why.
>>453904why go for attention when to can go for statistics?
>>454000What statistics? Attention industry is a thing though, see Tiktok and its clones (they even include subtitles for literal 1 minute videos)
Do literally anything with this image, repost in thread, next poster has to edit the last edit
Here you go :)
>>452159aawww, thank you!not interested though.
>>452159boink
boomp?
>/gd/ is secretly /x/ on shrooms with a blank canvas
Post /gd/ related memes
>>453969
I love finding new artists/designers but a lot of times the artist of an album cover is not credited on Discogs, which to my knowledge is the best discography website out there. Has anyone found a solution for this?Let's take for example the following album:https://www.discogs.com/master/3322963-Meduza-MeduzaNow I:1. Checked all versions listed below but found nothing (And I am lucky because some releases have a lot of versions)2. Check the uploaded booklets but that is becoming useless with more digital releases (and I found nothing btw)3. Use reverse image search but found nothing (Tineye, Yandex and Google)Please keep in mind that I am looking for an overall solution, not just this particular album.
>>453885that looks like ai generated garbage desuas far as art goes with albums, that stuff's only going to be in liner notes and even then if it's local or otherwise indie stuff they might have gotten it from an artist who doesn't want/care to be credited for it so there isn't really an ideal solution
>>453957It was just an example. What you say makes sense, unfortunately.
Alright c'mon, who's got it? Will trade for Suisse Int'l and Suisse Works.And Compacta Black Poster Std.
>>453546Cmon...please? I'm literally begging here. Somebody have a heart.
There's already a thread. Use that.
frutiger
>>453546>>453547Really? You don't have this piece of shit?https://www.sendspace.com/file/540skmYou better share what you promised.
we are slowly healing
really surprised this hasn't been posted already. here's the document with the Arnell Group's outrageous explanation of the pepsi logo redesign https://www.goldennumber.net/wp-content/uploads/pepsi-arnell-021109.pdf
>>452419ever since phoneposting came about yes
>>448841What's old is new
>>450295Hi, Arnell group!
>>448850They're both flat
Can I talk about video editing here? I really want to talk about it but I don't know what board really suits it, people at /tv/ just aren't interested at allNowadays, the only thing Premiere has over Davinci right now is the AI shit and communication with After, which is very useful, but Davinci is so good, is Premiere only so hegemonic because it's adobe?
general interest bump
>>450885what "AI shit"
>>453665>fcpx>can't even cut videos correctly>15000gb cache for a 10min 4K video>motion effects on par with 2010 after effects>"want an effect ? just buy a template bro"fcpx is okay if pirated and used for quick editing (vlogs, tiktok shit, ect)
>>450885Resolve is horrible.... anyone who thinks otherwise literally has no idea what they are talking about. Resolve MIGHT be used to do color correction by some professionals, but that should and is likely to change soon because Resolve has countless problems. I did what most people did where I couldn't stand using Premiere at one point because of Adobe's bullshit, so I tried to switch to Resolve, I went RUNNING back to Premiere. Anyone claiming they switched over is not editing anything substantial. Here's a short list of things Resolve sucks at:1. the display is all fuzzy; it's meant for color correction but the program can't even display the video in the quality that any other video player can; this is because it can't scale down without making the image go to shit.2. Text made in program will look like shit, when I used it I couldn't make titles without them having colored fringe around the edges... so you'll need to make 100% of your titles in another program.3. I figured that because Resolve is at the very least used for high end color correction it could be used to do green screen composites... well it actually can't. Even the keying in Premiere which is also pretty shitty is about 1,000 times better than what Resolves exported composite look like, they are 100% unusable with Resolve. Even when it comes to color grading Resolve almost under no setting will actually export what you see in the timeline... and not only will the gamma shift in various browsers or video players, it won't even look the same when reimported into FUCKING Resolve! Source: I'm a professional editor and could go on and on and on and on; Fuck Resolve and fuck Resolvetards
>>450885I use sony vegas pro. All my motion graphics are done in After Effects, then i export and compile the full length film in sony vegas.
