AK General /akg/This edition is brought to you by Adidas>Thread #2097Old: >>65196277
>>65265352>will they hold zeroI imagine some will and some won't, probably 50/50 maybe 60/40 will to won't. Chinkshit isn't bad by default but QC is hilariously nonexistent. That's where the money gets saved after all.Fwiw it lives on my WASR so less recoil than a shotgun, more than a 5.45.
>>65265824brrootthhheerrrr>>65266061How has zero been?
>>65266079Couldn't tell ya I haven't been to the range in months.Plumbing is expensive work. Really eats into the ammo budget.
Two SAM7SF questions. The ambi selector throws me off. Can I fit a retaining plate into it? Will surplus milled FCGs work?
I do not recommend 300 blackout rifles, it jams too much, accurate to 100m but gl with consecutive shots before it jams.
>>65258139Stop poaching the forest rats anon
>>65251666Based satan
>>65255808>implying 556 isn't completely fucking useless for anything civilians need to doAnd what exactly does that include? If you need something dead 5.56 has a proven track record>>65256348you missed the key word of modern
>>65259379Sorry>modern 30-30>goes in anything designed the last 100 yearsSince when did fudds learn how to troll?
>>65255808>implying 556 isn't completely fucking useless for anything civilians need to doPenetrates a quarter inch of hardened steel, can safely drop any game animal, kills a man further than any casual shooter can hit with anything, goes through IIIA armor.
In a letter to Ian Fleming, Geoffrey Boothroyd called the Beretta 418 "a woman's gun." Ian was so affected by this critique that he replaced James Bond's Beretta with the Walther PPK in his next novel, 1958's Dr. No. Do you think Geoffrey's critique was correct? Was the PPK better as James Bond's primary spy sidearm?
>>65264992It's a pretty reasonable approach to take for someone who acts in film, when you've got the background he has you gotta play into it and exploit it, including some exaggeration.Having a certain kind of aura, presence, charisma, that can do SO much by itself. It's why Arnold Schwarzenegger largely did mediocre acting overall (except Terminator, he really aced that), but he's got the looks, physique, personality, and most importantly, charm, that he's just kind of perfect for playing a certain larger than life action hero type.
>>65265396'the least grounded spy fantasy franchise is not very realistic' is a pretty low bar for adulthood, and I don't think 'they' have much to do with it.
>>65265396>Bond's what they want you to believe it's like, the same way that Rambo is what they want you to believe it's like. Nigger, nobody goddamn thinks this. Do you see the ridiculous shit in those movies?
>>65265396>Neither matters because that's not what the job's really like, it's a fantasy and a recruitment advertisement.No way really? I actually thought James Bond was a perfect reflection of reality and more of a documentary than a silly little movie series to watch for fun!>this is a board where people think .22 bounces around in the bodyI have never seen anyone say that here but also Britain did issue out Walthers in .22lr during the cold war lmao.You sound like a teenager who thinks they're the first person to discover that James Bond is in fact a work of fiction.
>>65262842are those 3 expansion chambers on the suppressor?
Mini 14 thread.
>>65262650I have the folding stock on my Mini and I absolutely love it. Got a fixed 3x on it and it shoots great. Take it out to 100+ yards without much issue. Also kicking a magazine out with a fresh one is so kino.
>>65263714
>>65263725It's the gun in the shell in a bunch of those 80s/90s scifi action movies, I think mostly because it was reliable with blanks.
>>65265556Same reason Beretta 92's are popular. All you really need to do to make one blank ready is to cut the tabs off of the locking wedge and they run blanks really well.
>>65264791True, but a new stock could probably be made that has a small magwell that wouldn't look *that bad*.
>TankArchives/k/s opinion on this guy?
>>65266309also his webblock (at least the old stuff) is fairly biased if iirclike I remember him arguing that the Panzerfaust was overrated and that Molotovs probably would have performed just as well
buy an ad
>>65266313>blockblog*
>>65266313>also his webblock (at least the old stuff) is fairly biased if iircalso can't forget the one time he argued that the loss-ratio on the eastern front was 1:1 by comparing Soviet permanent losses with Axis permanent + wounded
>>65266305I find the model kits to be extremely corny. I dont know why, its rationally a perfectly normal way to provide an example of something; and that other guy who uses knockoff lego doesnt bother me, but for some reason the model kits are goofy to me. That aside, hes okay.
What kind of trunk gun would you use handle this. I personally would go with a bubba shotgun
>>65262496The ATF loves boots
>>65261616Did you misclick or misread? There's nothing wrong with wanting MONSTERS in your MONSTERfucker novel. Foids and tumblerinas simply suck at writing monsters.
>>65211548
>>65210780
>>65211907Meds
Just curious, if you have neither, and could have one of them for free, which one would you choose?
>>65265429Oh I forgot I put a hera cqr foregrip on mine for max funni space gun
Are soft cast HPSWC +p .38spl as good as everyone says or is it just fuddlore?
Is the vortex shotgun sight any good? I saw it at my LGS and thought of putting it on my 590. I only have personal experience with Holosun, SIG, and Aimpoint dots
>>65262889After owning a G36E (SL8 conversion) and SG550, and recently buying a G36C clone, I think I prefer the form-factor of the shorter versions.Both the G36E and 550 are stupid front-heavy, so the shorter versions feel way more balanced, plus they lend themselves better to suppressing.
So I just got a killer deal on a thermal scope.Always wanted one, but never thought I would get one this soon. It begs the question however, I don't have anything to put it on. I love the idea of a decent suppressable, decent range/power caliber that can sort of create a point and click platform within a few hundred yards. I'm not super invested into anything yet, I know there are a lot of these "ARC" cartridges being shilled these days that might fit my use case. Maybe that is a good play and just get an upper i slap on something and call it good?Open to just about anything through
Haven't seen one of these in a hot minute
>>65247822Standard Mexican >>65262730Gay Mexican
>>65229502anything else would be wrongmoka akashiyaseax95 toyota crownChinese buffet mystery meatfn falmodel 10angry orcherd 6 pack
>>65265786Pic related highly recommended if you can get it.
>>65265828a fellow cider man you are a man of great choice
>>65245488>1895 and cap and ball revolverwat
Everything else is a downgrade.
>>65260528>I eat plain spagetti and boiled potatoesYawn.
>>65260528closebut thats not an 11.5 PSA AR and a gen 3 g19/rxm
>>65263730The Tongo Tongo ambush loadout
>>65260528>no smokes>no flashbangs>no nades>no armordesperation buy round? are we rushing B?
>>65260528Perfection if not for the fact that x39 is a dead caliberI hope you bought plenty of spam cans back in 2006
It looks cool and when (not if) they figure out the railguns and lasers it'll be by far the deadliest surface combatant in the maritime history.
>>65262175>Anon, leftists didn't paint the pool with blue paint that causes algae and leftists didn't then pour bleach into the pool that reacts with the type of paint they used.The problem isnt the pool paint, the problem is that the pool is filled with river water which both contains algae as well as fertilizer runoff from farms.
>>65262528The "leftist" part so far seems to consist of >some guy grabbing a piece of floating blue coating as a toxic momento>the notorious ANTIFA running through the 250m length of water with a katana cutting up said blue coating (no video exist)
>>65262358>The design has been continuously changing over the last six months. NAVSEA doesn't even plan to start preliminary design until September.Point in case, yeah.>Raytheon can't even build enough missiles to keep VLS filled during peace time.Pointing to underlying structural problems as a reason to make bad decisions is really not smart.>Obsessing over cell count is retarded. Pointing out the lack of VLS cellsl in the future fleet mix is not not 'obsessing over VLS count'.If they plan to have USV arsenal frigates, fucking well say it.But going 'nuh-uh it'll be fiiiiiine' is the actual retarded move.
>>65259730that's a hideous eyebrow
>>65259730Dear god, tell me that he's doing some kind of Gomer Addams cosplay
Learn this to defeat any melee weapon and then thank me for saving your physical and spiritual life.
>>65259867Blackmailing your opponent with child sex tapes may work on an international level but it's not really viable for personal self-defense.
>>65263593And the second best defense is pepper spray
>>65262692>However the people who practice real martial arts (with hard sparring and competition) don't generally train the techniques that are more applicable in street fightingI always hear this cope, but the reality is that the "street fighting techniques" are the same techniques artists are taught just applied differently. Yes, striking someone in the back of the head or in the throat is forbidden in competitions but every single boxer, karate, Tae Kwon Do, Muay Thai, K1 kickboxer, etc, knows how to do it. LOL>Also any serious school that teaches any martial art, whether competetively or not, is going to have hard sparring against resisting opponents.I agree, unfortunately Krav Maga dojos are generally not serious schools. See: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c2pkTIQPw5A and later in the video she fails to throw the black man like she said she could. >>65262703Yep.>>65263593Yep, this is also proved in the link I provided.>>65263822>pepper sprayThat's not how you spell gun.
>>65258036>anything jewish>saving your physical and spiritual life.X
>>65259692All it is is one marine to break the stick SERIOUSLY WHAT THE FUCK
what would its RTS quotes be
>>65256832Kek, if you keep clicking on one of the bong tanks the commander gets mad and orders an attack on the camera in the sky
>>65255782damn, bro
>>65255772>Zugg Zugg
>>65255772at least I have job
>Gay?! It is disciplinary action!Getting your oil refineries bombed won't hurt so much if your PMC company researches state sponsorship in time. You will roll the wheel of fortune every time you win (suffer losses) win.
why cant they just slap the mech armor on a tank
>>65263621Energy-efficiency is literally irrelevant when you have a goddamn fusion engine powerful enough to operate a whole-ass arsneal of anti-tank rated DEWs.
>>65263621>even Battletech now thinks there's actually no reason that Battletechs should exist anymore.they were nobility weapons for a while, even in old lore battlemechs were hunks of junk only kept as status symbols for their petty wars
>>65262767>Well, yeah. Thats been one of the big recurring arguments against mechs on /k/ for the 15 years Ive been here, is that any material lightweight and tough enough to make mechs not a retarded death-trap would also necessarily result in gunships that can take direct cannon fire all day and MBTs that can be dropped by parachute.
>>65266262What's even the argument being made here? An F16 could be rendered inoperable by a single burst of rifle fire, as could a semi truck. A mech should at the very least survive rifle fire, presumably more if you want them to be worth fielding. An F16 will also crumble like paper if its weight is concentrated on any surface that isn't the landing gear, whereas a mech should reasonably expect every part of its frame to be structural and load bearing from practically any angle, to account for the mech going prone or taking a knee, etc; and shock resistant since not every step it takes will be soft or from a uniform height. You would have to be the dumbest nigger alive to be making the assertion that the material demands of a mech chassis are the same as those of an airframe or truck chassis, so presumably you're trying to say something else?
>>65266262damn, how many truck could you fit in a carrier?
Anyone ever done this?
>>65263863OPs missing a huge chunk of the left side of the receiver. No amount of solder or remelting plastic will fix it.>>65262751The back of the receiver is holding in the upper and recoil springs. The bolt is slamming into the back of it with the recoil springs. He's missing like 1/4 of the material in that section on the vz.61. OPs retarded. Let him post his sbr and try firing it with the bolt going through his already empty skull when the receiver fails and the bolt keeps going with the back half of the receiver into his skull.
>>65263863If we’re being honest filament isn’t a good material either, but we’re on the bleeding edge of science here. Yeah, it looks like ass but I actually don’t see much of a problem here. It could have been a worse print issue. The barrel pins in so easy that I almost wonder if a .22lr and printed bolt might hold.
>>65263877It’s not a big chunk tho. It will hold. Will it last? Probably not. You gotta have some faith in the plastic.
>>65262927>not a terrible bondinclude me in the collage lol
>>65262621he's EPOXYLESShe's BROKE!!!!!WHOAAAA BUDDYYYY
Not much is known about it at the moment, but it's being developed by Viettel and the VPA institute.Munition:> Range: 70 & 150 km> Diameter: 300mmThey're also developing an ATACMS-like missile for it too, which will have a range of ~300 kmIt looks similar to the K239 Chunmoo and the PULS, but all these MLRS have different missile diameter size and configuration
>>65252603Thanks. >>65252890>>65253063Rockets and range come first then guidance.>>65252603Xi stop embarrassing yourself. >>65259025Choosing Norks over Russia is not necessarily a bad idea these days, especially as the DPRK and Vietnam are long term friends and Vietnam owes the DPRK. Nork light armor would be better than BMP-1 clones for Vietnam as well, Nork 323 APCs BTFO base M113s and BMP-1s. Happy Summer Solstice everyone! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nd3v6qoAdA
>>65260117>North Korea was indeed something of a pioneer, they built theirs to bombard Seoul which was out of reach of effective ballistic MLRS.It's why i like them so much, they deal with their specific situation and exports are incidental to their own needs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQc6qo-L4_Y
>>65262344Norktard I don't get you. You mix extremely smart takes with pants-on-head retarded takes that not even the thirdies usually beat. I want whatever you're smoking man
>>65261586Philippines still hasn't defeated their communist and Muslim insurgencies after decades of war.
>>65256560Which is really weird honestly. They will never have the kind of stability that is required to become a financial powerhouse like the US, and they most certainly don't have the higher education infrastructure to support high-complexity white collar industries, not at any level rivaling the West anyway. Low-complexity manufacturing is all they have and there's not any path forward for them if they outsource it.Also btw they're not outsourcing anything to Mexico really, that's just American companies moving it there for the combined factors of logistics, NAFTA, and Chinese wanting to be paid wages slightly above subhuman-level (unacceptable)
