What kind of gun should I buy for my daughter to practice shooting
>>64469263You have options:1. .22 LR rifle. It can be a lever gun, bolt gun, pump gun or semi-auto gun.2. Shotgun; some people buy a lightweight .410 and watch their kids hate it (small shells have less shot). Instead, you can buy a 5-pound 20-gauge or an 8-pound 12-gauge and buy low-recoil/light loads. I promise you they'll have more fun that way.3. pellet/BB gun; if she's extremely young, you can start working on her marksmanship with something that shoots cheaper ammo. Those guns can still kill small animals, so she should still follow gun safety.4. Target handgun; Assuming they already learned on the ones above or are becoming teens, you can start them on the hardest gun to master, the pistol. Something with low recoil like a full-size 9mm, or even better, a target .22 LR gun (Ruger MK IV, Colt Woodsman, S&W Victory, Browning Buckmark, etc.) can help them learn fundamentals quickly.
>>64469296pipeline, ignore it.>>64469263.22's are a good start, both in pistol and rifles for practicing, fundamentals, all that sort of stuff. i'd move up in rifle calibers long before moving up in pistol calibers though, as the jump from .22 to 9mm in a pistol is much more noticeable than from a .22 to 5.56
>>64469263Wemi can't be trusted with firearms, anon.
>>64469263i got a savage rascal for my oldest son and my other two kids (daughters) learned off that. They really like it, and it's pretty accurate and the trigger is really nice too. only my son has gotten into handguns / shotguns so far, the other two are a little too young.we mostly shot off a bench.
>>64469667This.Anything heavier than a nerf gun is a recipe for disaster.
instead of camo of blotches, just use plaids.have set balance of colors of more or less camo hues, but different units or ranks would have diff plaid design.apparently its a whole "language" with nearly infinite amount of data can be included.like arranging flowers, no real "bad" way to make plaid.I'm pretty sure you can even represent letters, at least enough for short name.
>>64467360Based and suburban-dad pilled
>>64467950>unironically advocating for a plaid tankyou're the dumbest person who has ever posted on this website
the Celts had this coded plaid. I think it was called tartans and each clan had a different tartan plaid color.
>>64467950and you've submitted this to the DoD yes
This thread is filtering so many retards rnthanks OPhttps://www.boone-crockett.org/plaid-good-camo
>>64469493Forgot pic
>>64469498What we're seeing is pretty clearly just missing this section. I mean, you can see pretty much exactly where it joins up in this pic.mulligan, better drawing this time
>>64469521Call it agree to disagree then. I’m not saying you can’t be right but just from where I’m sitting I just don’t see it
>>64469767Fair enough. If we could see the front side of those ducts it would settle it right away.
>>64469774Yeah props to their marketing team on this one. Only showing the one view of it to drive all kinds of speculation
What was Sun Tzu wrong about?
>>64466761Jericho is sure to fall to the Hebrew's wonderwaffen Ark
>>64460970I think he knows a little more about fighting than you do pal.
>>64463749Correct but it's also worth noting that in some cases, you had to be a capable commander for your family to become (and remain, in your sons' cases) nobility
>>64469225Not necessarily. Unless there are regular wars an aristocratic family can basically claim to be effective military commanders and nobody will be able to prove otherwise.
>>64460702The jews.
what the fuck happened in Rio? around 100 narcos +4 cops died in the raid they started on the 28th of october what tactics does BOPE/Brazilian police use when they crackdown on narcos?
Reloadspeed upgrade
>>64468830The ones in the frontline pretty much.
>>64468298He's starting to kinda try.>>64467743Unfortunately, its not 1970 anymore. I actually send some of the stuff I find on social media to RJ cops I know, they outright told me they can only really monitor the most wanted and top dogs eletronically because its so much information and so many suspects it overwhelms their resources.>>64468700Depends, there's a lot of BOPE and CORE police with masks, but I'm pretty sure the regular cops they gotta break regulations if they want to do that.>>64468738This is a article by the cunts at Globo about his arrest in Colombia in a FARC camp.https://blogs.oglobo.globo.com/blog-do-acervo/post/eu-crio-gado-e-tenho-imoveis-so-isso-prisao-de-fernandinho-beira-mar-na-selva-da-colombia.htmlBut the article from the Folha de São Paulo about him celebrating 9/11 in prison I can't find. It's old as hell straight from 2001 and Google fucking sucks.
>>64465690>No, they and the Democrats are evolving rapidly in to Soviet style partiesCan you go more into this Anon? Its the first time I've heard about it.
>>64464302>Fairly simple, they massed troops at the bottom of the hill, and laid an ambush at the top, then began sweeping upwards knowing they'd flee to a more advantageous position. Then they hosed them with lead.Based, I wish we'd do that to methmonkies and crackheads here.
How well are they made in 2025?
>>64463116if every ppk had a 13lb trigger then I probably wouldn't mind it, I have a beretta 84 with a ~11lb trigger and it's fine. it's the prospect of getting a trigger that's any heavier than that. 17lb would really suck even if it's mostly at the start of the pull. I guess I'll just have to try one out in a gun store.>>64463150>You can pull the hammer back manually for your first shot and shoot SAyeah you can of course avoid the issue at the range but I'd like to potentially make it my carry gun.>I like the heavy DA trigger for concealed carry. It's like a secondary safety mechanism.I do too, but the 8lb trigger pull on my D spring beretta 92 is safe enough for me, any more than about 10lb is more than necessary for safety IMO. but again I'll just have to see what it's like in real life, numbers on a screen don't always tell the whole story
>>64468577I forgot to ask what year of production was it?
>>64468786I don't know, is there a way to check? I don't have it anymore, i sent it to Walther and they sent me a new one insteadit was the new threaded barrel version so 24or25
>>64467174ECCO Machine Cheetah Gen 1. Pretty sure the can is exactly the same but with a more slopey neck. I like it a lot, and I like that it comes apart so I can use it for 22 as well and properly clean it after that.>>64468983Shame about your first one. So far my only malfunctions have been that I do get some failures to cycle if I'm not using the suppressor while having it all filthy from previously shooting it suppressed without cleaning it, and one failure to fire a round with a PMC cartridge that I suspect was the ammo since it hasn't reoccured with anything else.Mine is from the first batch of the threaded ones, I think I had the order in within an hour of the first listings going live. So I don't think it was something wrong that they fixed but just a fluke or maybe generally poor QC.I also just now found out someone makes a flush thread protector for it and I fucking need one.
>>64469763And found it and orderedhttps://shop.oldglorygunsandammo.com/products/ppk_s_sd_thread_protector_blk_32_acp
How is an MP5 on at 25 and 100 meters? the MP5 manual says it is and I've seen a vid of some guy doing it, but I can't get any ballistics chart online to show me 9mm hitting at the same spot for 25 and 100 meters
>>64469027that was the armorer being based and autistic and buying P90s without telling anyone because he thought they made more sense in lore and then he brought them to multiple meetings until they asked him about them>>64469021nah, you are the gay retard here
>>64468967>Again, in order to explain to OP how some guns have two and some have one, in reality BOTH have two zeros, just sometimes those two zeros are close enough to EFFECTIVELY be a single zero.look dude, even if you are correct, OP was never asking how some guns effectively have one zero, he was asking how an MP5 shooting 9mm could have a 25/100m zero and was talking about how ballistic calculators showed him zeroes where 25m was effectively the apex. you're the only autistic fuckhead who cares about being technically correct about mathematical shit that has no bearing on real life. and you still haven't explained why you can't have a zero at the tangent line to the theoretical maximum.
>>64468967No, you're still a moron.
>>64469027>TFW your TV show buys up all the available 5.7mm FN blank rounds, really pissing off the Secret Service, and so you switch to other weapons to cause less trouble
>>64468772It's called a double root retard. You can have them at the same point.
How much does a competent tank matter when you have moderno Fire control systems?
The French made it a beret.
>>64469501Killed a lot of Yemenis with no total losses, though they did have mission losses. The ammo being isolated did a lot to help. France24 and a few other channels had some good videos about it up on YT for a while, but the UAE gov takes down a lot of combat footage through copyright infringement claims. It's fucking annoying. Also the UAE variants have German V12 engines, not the the French V8. Basically it seems like the UAE forces actually use the mobility to their advantage and do constant shoot and scoot with BMP3 mounted infantry running a lot of rapid dismounting and remounting for support. So basically the opposite of how the Saudis and most other Arab armies use their tanks as mobile bunkers.
>>64469599
>>64469635>Arabs use French tank succesfully>Posting about this means you're Jewish>Here is some AI slopI hate poltards.
Tell me about the Leclerc. Does it have an ammo carousel in the turret or something? Something else the French identified as a problem after watching a thousand Russian tanks getting smoked by tiny mortar drops and FPV drones from above?t. WW2-only tank knower
>>64469725Leclercs have the ammo stored in a bustle with blowout panels like the Abrams, but they also have an autoloader. The turret only has two men in it and they sit largely below the turret ring. Originally there was also ammo stored besides the driver but that was deleted in the 2000s.
What's it like to be infantry in 2025?
>>64467320>Although it's always been like this in the infantry. I'd say now is really fucking bad, due to all the accurately targeted big booms. Even if you don't die on the spot, you'll still lose limbs. Only time it's been similarly bad was during the early gunpowder era, when you had no bayonet, and there were still lancers and demi-lancers roaming the battlefield. If your pikemen got mashed by arty or opposing arquebusiers, you'd be massacred by the enemy's heavy cavalry.
>>64467373It means Cav Scouts are fags lol
>>64469217most infantrymen from the year 0 until the year 1880 died from shitting themselves to deathand from 1880 until 1990 the average infantryman died from random explosions they had no way of protecting themselves fromthe attrition rates for LSCO are lower than they have ever been
When I was leaving the infantry nearly 10 years ago the unit was getting sent new guys who could not even pass basic fitness standards and had an incredibly long way to go before they were at the standard expected once you'd been 6 months in battalion. If it was like that then I suppose it's only gotten worse by now seeing as the trends of enshitification and pussyfication have only gotten worse. At the time there were stories circulating about plans to allow women to join and for a 'new set of fitness standards'.
>>64469655Did you get guys that were shooting marksman coming out of OSUT?
Ukraine needs more s-125s so that they can finally shoot down one of the su-57s that have been FABing them to the ground
Why are Serbians like this? There are less than 7 million of them but they’re so vocal it feels like there are magnitudes more.
>>64469427Finns are worse
>>64469571Finns are funny, though
>>64469571Fuck off back to Belgrade
>>64469668I'm Turkish
What is the best strategy to win without being killed in the process?
>>64469673>explains why all their neighbors supported the spanish in destroying themMakes the Spanish sound like the good guys.
>>64469698>>64469480cont:Again, both you and the other anon should see >>64443973, >>64443995, >>64446179, >64446201, >>64449789, >64463581, >>64466255, >>64466289, >>64466346, and the additional posts I link within the pastebin, arch.b4k.dev and desuarchive threads I linked within that last post. This is a topic I have spoken about at length. As an analogy, saying "Cortes got allies against the Mexica due to them being sacrificed and being hated" is a bit like saying "The allies banded together to fight the Axis powers in WW2 because they were opposed to them attacking naval bases in the pacific": You're projecting the motives of Tlaxcala/the US onto all the other allied states, who didn't nessacarily share those motives, and you're also framing sacrifices/attacking naval bases as something the states had an inherent moral opposition to, rather then only caring if they were the military targets in question and would have no issue doing it to others themselves. And as I say in >64446602, even Tlaxcala, the closest thing here to a clear victim rising up against the Mexica due to their aggression, still used the Conquistadors to further their own political influence and power. Even if I tried to steelman my own point here and tried to come up with counterpoints to myself, and I have done this in the past and would be happy to do so here, at BEST you could say that resentment was *a* factor for the states that allied with Cortes, not the main or only or biggest factor for most of them, and that resentment still would not be more intense then it would be towards any capital that had rule over any other subject in history were they were conquered into it.>>64469698See above, they were not.37/37 for now
>>64469588Still is. Why do you think all those>muh tradcathHispanics in America support abortion?
>>64469705aztecs never stood a chance against them
>>64435704>It's impossible. The Spanish unironically were blessed by God in their conquest of the New World and no other explanation makes sense.TRVKE
Let's say guns got banned in america, hypothetically speaking, wouldn't people just transition to "bomb" making, like DIY homemade shit, or is that too hard to do?
>>64464994Cartels would just have another billion dollar market in exporting guns from Latin America to USA. People will print 3d guns or make home made guns.
>>64465160They will just make Molotov cocktails and firebomb schools instead.
>>64467579yeah after like a decade of people having their rights denied to them. I wish there were a mechanism for having this shit overturned faster if not a mechanism for punishing lawmakers for making blatantly unconstitutional laws. that's also assuming that the supreme court doesn't cuck out like they did with the 2013 maryland AWB that they just recently refused to hear.
>>64466918Oh yeah I remember them, they also sold registered molotovs. I'm convinced they were just shitposting within the bounds of the law, giving everyone a headache
>>64465455This. Daegu subway fire. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daegu_subway_fireGuy was just suicidal and trying to off himself. Instead he lived and got charged with killing 192 people. Mass murder via arson is a thing I expect to see more off
Isn't it about time to start getting it all together?
There was a thread a few weeks ago. Some traffic, not much. Might still be in the archives somewhere.
>>64465685sarge made a thread few weeks ago saying hes accepting email signups. Hasnt replied to me yet.There was also another anon who claimed he got a "copy" of the old site ready.Since then radio silence.
I miss when soldiers used to dress up in flashy clothes
>>64469002No
>>64467810>Kabukimono>look it up on google images>animeThis is as bad as the time that a Saber clone came up when looking up Nero Claudius.
>>64469684Fate is a fucking cancer
Dress armor, bring it back. Formal wear armor.
