>>4506935
Aw, come on, sis. Don't be a dick.

>>4440468
This is why I ship Ada and Carla. This hilarious scene where Ada hears "Ada Wong is moving south" over the radio and Ada is like WTF.

>>4504519
>>4508520
What does this have to do with horror? At this point this is just the gore lite thread, which is not what it is supposed to be.

>>4506935
Yes

File: 117579996.jpg (3.4 MB, 4177x6005)

3.4 MB JPG

This is the most powerful panel in history.

>>4506290
Wrong * no Miko thread, sis.

>>4510268
Wow, I was really not paying attention when I posted that. Still a great page in any context.

>>4473208
How the heck is the Avatar book relevant? No way they made Kyoshi a lesbian.

>>4510351
>No way they made Kyoshi a lesbian
You're right, they threw that in the chart as a goof. Definitely not the fiercely independent Avatar who trained a whole woman-only society of warriors.
She's not gay, but her girlfriend is.

>>4510369
Literally all we knew about her in the show is that she was a murderous maniac with a no nonsense attitude. If you think a woman-only society should mean that everyone in there is gay, then why the fuck were all of them het in the show and wanted Sokka's dick?
What I am saying is there was no actual reason to believe she is gay. If the book did that, then it's something that they could have never done back then. The Korra era could barely scrape by with Korrasami in the final episode.
>threw that in the chart as a goof
Frankly I have no idea who makes these and I have seen too many anons here spread works that have either only subtext or have some minor lesbian side-couple in them, neither of which I consider worth recommending a book over.

>>4510373
>If you think a woman-only society should mean that everyone in there is gay
I didn't say that, just implied that being a lesbian would fit neatly into that.
You don't seem very – how do I put this politey? – good at... imagining things?

>>4510375
I can pretend every character is a lesbian just fine. I don't do it though unless it's my headcanon ship and unlike those cases, this is officially licensed material we are talking about, so sorry for having legitimate doubts...

Also nobody really gave any proof yet that Kyoshi is actually lesbian or what actually caused that book to be recommended.

>>4510374
Not any of the people you replied to. Nothing happening in that conversation is particularly "anti-woke". It's pretty specifically just pointing out the absolutely peak retarded idea of saying "I am not a woman" and "I am a woman who likes other women" at the same time, because by saying that you are a lesbian you are proclaiming
>singular they/them
Despite what people argue, these are not actually equal and totally heckin valid alternatives that can just be slotted into any nominative or accusative position in place of the gendered ones whenever you feel like it. Like all close (class) category words, they have a very specific, pretty locked in function, which in this case is to be used in rare edge cases where you are speaking about an individual but it is impossible to determine the gender or sex. It was never designed to just be a preferential replacement referring to a person that has an obvious male/female identification, and it does not function that way within the current conventional grammar, which is why it introduces confusion over who is being talked about and how many people and why people have to deliberately train themselves to use it rather than the more appropriate pronoun in a situation (and will frequently make mistakes).

>>4510378
>It was never designed to just be a preferential replacement
Language evolves, granny. Get with the times

>>4510378
Shut up!

>>4510374
There is nothing anti-woke or right wing about not tolerating the stupidity of NBs. Even less so of hating trannies, which is the default on /u/. We are not /lgbt/, we don't need to hug with all the other letters of the alphabet. If it gets in the way of yuri it's bad. Period.
>singular they/them
Lack of reading comprehension has gotten worse lately. If you had the brain to read the full convo instead of cherrypicking posts, you would see that this was a convo started by anons seeing more and more fics where ALL characters get they/them'd brainlessly. Or in some cases canonically female characters for no fucking reason specifically.

>>4510444
You are suggesting to devolve language for mentally ill NBs. Nobody here will. Women pretending not to be women is not supported by /u/.

File: Kvs1lGw.png (127 KB, 573x327)

127 KB PNG

>>4510444
>Language evolves
It literally >>>doesn't<<< evolve like that, anon. That is what makes a CLOSED class category "closed", as opposed to an OPEN class one. The open ones are the ones where new words get added and meanings can readily be changed, because they are lexical categories that just have all sorts of words that exist to have a meaning, like "cap" and "riz" and "nibling". The closed class ones are non-lexical, they are not about meaning, they are pure utilitarian function, like "of" and "an" and "the" and pronouns, and you cannot just forcibly inject new meaning or function into them because they are not so much words with a complete semantic association as they are the very precise segments of framework that exist as structure.

You can decide that "bet" means "okay" and "tea" means "gossip". You cannot decide that "the" is now a valid substitution for "a". Those two words have specific functional applications as structure in the language, there are two of them for a reason, not just for funsies so you have different ways to say things. There is a reason why all of those words are the exact same (minor phonetics aside) even across completely different, near unintelligible dialects or varieties of English, from Texan to Australian to the gobbledygook Scotts or Appalachians pretend is English.

It is always just going to come across as a deliberate deviation that generates confusion, and it is always going to be something that people have to forcibly train themselves to use (and slip up with even when they are literally enbies themselves) because it's trying to force a word function change on a group of words whose whole thing is having a very specific set function. You would unironically have an easier time just trying to neutralize either he or she in the way that "you guys" is neutralized, than trying to force the indeterminate gender singular pronoun to firmly mean a determined neutral gender.

>>4509775
The very act of introducing them already delivers yuri; the content of the series itself is what supports and does not contradict yuri, even if it is not explicitly stated at the end.

>>4509828
A het couple got a kiss at the end, while yuri just got >>4485800 in the same chapter, really makes you think.

>>4509828
A series in which het love is textual and expressed, even with kisses and talks about marriage, while yuri got one random kiss that wasn't even properly followed up on and with no tangible relationships by the end is pretty pathetic for "yuri".

>>4509883
>>4509971
Which makes your complaint worthwhile, if it weren't for one small detail: the whole damn series, if the whole series in question didn't exist, I would agree with you, but since the series exists, I can't do that.

File: DreamBelievers.jpg (119 KB, 850x1189)

119 KB JPG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iW5q-aXEzs

>>4510419
the comic is too fetish-y for my taste, plus completely OOC acting

Does anyone have that comic of Falin and Marcille in the bath, where Falin's trying to avoid looking at Marcille's crotch like "I should look, so what, I'll see her pubes, I've seen pubes before" and then panel 2 she's like "That's naked pussyyyyyyy!"

I can't find it anywhere

File: farc.jpg (753 KB, 1300x2600)

753 KB JPG

>>4509066

>>4396533
>Marcille ends up tripping balls from some poison berries and confesses to loving Falin.
A line earlier she calls Falin her best friend, so it could be more of sisterly love. But her stuttering at the love part may hint otherwise.

File: DlRe1lHUYAI5K0y.jpg (119 KB, 974x706)

119 KB JPG

>>4509310
>>4509310
sweet