Why are Christian artists so soulful and beautiful, even the commercial illustrators?
>>7735039Here's her dad's work. He is kind of a big deal lol.http://www.arludik.com/oeuvresE/Keane/kean.htm
>>7735040I wish to reach this level of figure drawing one day.
>>7735053He's the greatest animator of the last 50 years, uncontroversially. So he has that going for him.
>>7735027>you shall not make graven images Enjoy hell!
>>7735071define graven
Should I add my signature to my art? I’ve been wondering about that for a while. My instructors have always said it makes pieces look more professional and polished. I never thought about it for digital art I post online, only my traditional works.I’ve seen a lot of people not care about watermarks and literally go out of their way to edit them. However, I do want to be recognized. If I do want to add a signature, what way should I go about it? Should I lower the opacity? Be annoying with it? Make it look creative? Just sign it and date it? Any help/advice is much appreciated.
I don't sign my works because my fav artist doesn't sign theirs. I love seeing my works posted other places and the users there asking for the source and someone linking my sites to them
Of course you should sign your work! Everyone should know who's responsible for the abominations you create!
Yes, and make it obscure the drawing. Make the AItrannies seethe.
remember the patreon watermark
>>7731207yes and make it as unreadable as possible so nobody knows who actually made the piece
Everyone with consciousness knows that Banksy sucks, but not enough people actually get into the reason why,Basically, Banksy 's art is only popular among people who don't care about art.Appreciating Banksy doesn't require having a genuine attraction to colours and shapes hitting your eyes, all it asks of you is to be able to understand a clever visual irony. Its on the same level as newspaper comic strips.Banksy's fame among normies is the most damning proof that fine art is at its lowest point of popularity in human history.
>>7733812>all it asks of you is to be able to understand a clever visual irony.Does it even require that? What's ironic, or requires any thought, when viewing this picture of the Mona Lisa with a bazooka and headphones?Honestly, I just dislike a lot of his artwork because it's both preachy, and incredibly pretentious.I will praise him for often using the environment as part of the graffiti though
Banksy is only popular with rich people that collect his """ art""" as a status symbol. No one else gives a shit.
>Banksy 's art is only popular among people who don't care about art.This is exactly what he wants with his art, the art is just a tool to send the message, and it works.
>>7733812its a pr firm for state endorsed social engineering and propaganda. also money laundering of any art that is sold. graffiti is not art. its anti-art. destruction of beauty, culture and architecture to demoralize and degrade public with affront to nature and standards. basically a stencil tracer. most of the art is stolen compositions and themes repurposed and perverted. jewish brutalism in origin.
>hey Goy, want to raise the price of this property by x10 ?Very talmudic.
Is there much of a point in doing portrait drawings for concept art?
>>7729079Cool and interesting
QRD on this anon
Whats the fastest way to keep consistent sprite scale across multiple sprites and backgrounds?
ITT: Your favorite styles of rendering.Chris Van Allsburg uses graphite powder to get this dreamlike effect.
>>7732019Early to mid Caravaggio got fed up with trying to learn glazing and went in alla prima more or less, late Caravaggio went back to glazing, a lot of grey, dark but NOT black mixing into the figures with shadows but never direct black.A lot of people find this technique to be among the most useful, I personally never got around to it because I found that it was reliant on knowing exactly where to place shadows, which is why he always worked with models, in fact he was one of the first to directly paint from a model. Before then unless it was a portrait and these were always small and one person type stuff, artists would work from drawings and not models directly.
>>7733964This pic is so stylized that I'm not sure what's meant to be shading, so I'd say probably not. It's a great piece, though.
>>7734725I see, thanks! Then I'm apparently not a renderfag. Hatching cleanly with ink is really hard, so I prefer to hatch as little as possible. I would love to be able to paint like this >>7731975 but that is just so different from how I've been drawing my whole life. I prefer a more lineart focused, art nouveau style.
Although it depends on the medium. I like hatching with graphite, but not with ink.
>>7734935rendering is just anything that isn't linework
Soul?
>>7733145>The king of /ic/ is back. I kept your crown polished, sire
Why is my face planted flat on the floor? I can't get up, either. My knees--move!!
I'm the king now?
>>7733167Tonetta is 777 king
If an artist is doing commissions on artistree, vgen and reddit, it should be mandatory for them to provide clients with a sketch before being paid in order to prove that they can replicate the desired art style of the art the client wants drawn.
>>7732155pay me 50% of the commission now, no refunds. You can pay the rest when the commission is finished. If it gets cancelled halfway, at least the artist pocketed half of it for their time.
>>7731563This is why my communiques go over Discord, and that I never 'hand over' the final piece until after payment confirmation. It's all screenshots until then.
>>7734452>I never 'hand over' the final piece until after payment confirmationIsnt this common sense?
>>7733289And why is that a problem exactly?
>>7734452I don’t even draw a single line unless full payment upfront.
ITT: We post permabegs and their net worth.Damien Hurst: $384 Million
Gerhart Richter 40mil
>>7734390how do I, as a beg, trick rich people into giving me money
>>7733781>Why wouldn't art be used as collateral assets?To demonstrate that this is a tax evasion scheme, and art isn't worth that much without the clauses in our system that allow it to be exploited. If houses weren't allowed to be used as collateral, it'd still be worth a lot. Food, materials, and most everything else would still retain its value.>if some rich retard will pay a million dollars for a piece of art then it's worth that muchThe point is they WOULDN'T if art wasn't allowed to be used as assets to manipulate the system.
This was Matisse's attempt at realism. He drew countless images like this. The market value of all his work easily reaches into the tens of billions. To put it another way, this permabeg's art is plausibly more valuable than that of all living American artists combined.
>>7734609>To demonstrate that this is a tax evasion schemeGreat plan, today I will make the most airtight tax evasion scheme, except for the fact that I will demonstrate to everyone that I am doing it. Once you figure that out, my whole scheme is ruined.>art isn't worth that much without the clauses in our system that allow it to be exploitedSays who? How much would the Sistine Chapel be worth according to you? A Rembrandt? A Picasso? Do you think that the art market should have tiered prices based on whether /ic/ considers them /beg/, /int/ or pro?>If houses weren't allowed to be used as collateral, it'd still be worth a lot.House prices can be pumped the exact same way the art market can be. Just look at the 2008 housing market crash.>The point is they WOULDN'T if art wasn't allowed to be used as assets to manipulate the system.The rich would definitely pay millions of dollars for art. They already have houses, food, and transportation. Art offers prestige and the image of appearing cultured. I'm not saying there isn't manipulation, but it's a manipulation of a market that would've existed no matter what. Art was not "allowed" to be asset just because Shlomo lobbied it to make it so. Literally every single culture and civilization throughout history has made art. Cavemen painted on walls and carved patterns into pottery. Everyone values art. Just because you're a poorfag with no disposable income, doesn't mean that people wouldn't spend money collecting things like MTG cards, old coins, Gunplas, and Rolexes even if their phone can tell them the time.
is there much benefit to learning the manga "style" if you already study realism? like, does drawing manga help with mastering fundies?
>>7734635Sexbots, genius. Infinite stamina. Infinite eagerness. Infinite flexibility. Infinite understanding of your body and preferences.
>>7734635it gets boring after a month
>>7734640my grandma used to say "they is only so many ways you can spit them pigs"
>>7734324Until it actually happens I don't see how it's cope.
>>7734246oh no no no westbros, how are we going to recover? we are getting called out, mogged on and dabbed on by Saito
What's some commercial art you really like? Pic related (Celestial Seasonings).
Newman's Own products used to have these delightfully insane things like these.
I only thought to save them when I noticed that the box design was updated without these personal touches.
>>7733537>>7733536I miss these 20th-century cartoon designs so much. Will they ever come back?
>>7733536>>7733537I prefer him nude honestly. Something about the clothes makes him feel gimmicky to me.Are mascots even a thing these days? I can't think of a recent mascot character off the top of my head.
>>7734772Hmmm not so much, now that you mention it. People see them as a little corny these days.
Hi /ic/I hope you all doing well Btw I'll be posting my daily practice here (I hope I can keep up) So feel free to criticize and give me advices Today subject was leg anatomy
>>7728298Fuck you
>>7729962You can't fuck a /pro/ with your /beg/ stats
>>7731842Good one I laughed You're really a cool rage baiter and troll
did the op give up?
>>7734038Nah I just buried him as the /pro/ I'm and made quit drawing because he's below/beg/
ITT: "Art" "styles" you fucking despise.
>>7731964Yeah bro, I am sure the Japs who hate foreigners will gladly embrace you in their arms because you watched a couple Japanese cartoons, dumbass weeb.
>>7688666aisloppers
>>7709910It's always the weird nose they add to so many characters. It could be any of the style of noses, but it's always slapped on front and center, like they're deathly afraid of anything even remotely looking 0.000000001% like anime so they just go WHAM ugly ass nose. You could take away all of the other issues and leave the nose and the nose would still immediately ruin the whole thing. At least "tumblr nose" hasn't been as popular as it was in prior years.
>>7731960i am not a weeb but why are there so many fervent anti weebs who discredit the objective and observable artistic merits of any and all anime art? it's literally no different than saying you hate the entire canon of western illustration just because of something like diary of a wimpy kid
>>7734740> it's literally no different than saying you hate the entire canon of western illustration just because of something like diary of a wimpy kidBut there ARE dumbasses who constantly dismiss western art on this board, because they like anime and manga more than their western counterparts.Just look at >>7732901 .Ya gotta accept there's dumbasses, no matter the position.
why don't you guys push your own styles more? realism and anime are huge here, but it's easier to get attention with a unique style.doesn't have to be fancy. ed roth turned this style into a commercial empire in the 1960s.
>>7731980One of my influences, most people don't know who Vaughn bode is and just care about r crumb in the underground comix scene
>>7730868The most beloved artists tend to be ones with recognisable styles.Hell, a particular style works wonders because it's also a type of marketing, and I think a fairly strong one; would scott pilgrim have been as successful as it was if not for Brian Lee O'Malley's distinctive and fairly influential style?Would the Gorillaz be as beloved without Jamie Hewlett's work?I think not, and I think if you have a distinct style of your own you'll sell more work, because where else can the audience get work like that? It's you and only you? Despite how incredibly influential O'Malley's and Hewlett's work as been, I don't think either of them have been replaced by any of their would be copycats.That said, I think there's not much advice on it here because it's something that usually either develops naturally, or the artist shouldn't worry about, because their skills are not at the point where they should be worry about a personal 'style'.If you can't draw a box, why worry about style?
>>7731917>Devilman Crybaby and Umamusume are cut from the same clothsure bud
>>7732814when should an artist start thinking about style?
>>7732635Best post ITT.
Why don't manga artists care about 70-30 value dominance, giving the eye places to rest, using the full value range when rendering, or visual readability in general. So much of the art is just noisy.
>>7733924Do you have any idea how hard it is to come up with dozens of creative competitions every week? Storyboards are the hardest part of manga.
>>7733929Compositions*
>>7733924pyw
>>7733662>giving the eye places to rest bros eyes get tired looking at art lmbo
>>7733984Please be trolling.
